Preview

Knights Vs Samurai Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Knights Vs Samurai Research Paper
Metal clashes, the war begins, the fearless warriors rush forward in their elaborate armor covering them from head to toe. Whether that armor belonged to a knight or a samurai doesn’t matter, because they are not all too different. The knights of Feudal Europe were fearsome armed warriors who lived to protect their country and fought even if it meant death. The fearless samurai of Feudal Japan did the same. Both groups lived to serve their lords and leader, and they fought to keep peace and to protect their country. The question is, were the samurai, the brave warriors of Japan, and knights, the strong warriors of Europe, more similar or different? The European knights and the Japanese samurai were much more similar than different because of their feudal structure, lords, and code of conduct.
The structure of the feudal classes in the knight and samurai societies was extremely similar. Feudalism system created in Europe during the Middle Ages to create social order. Two feudal pyramids created from an unknown author using various sources show a comparison for the
…show more content…
Samurai, the warriors of Japan, and knights, the warriors of Europe, had a similar feudal structure. You could tell because of the Pope and King in Europe, and the Emperor and Shogun in Japan were always the head of the social pyramid. Samurai and knights were always lesser than their lord. The bond between the lord and warrior was an important connection because it gave the lords protection and the warriors gained land, money, and other resources. This bond was typically summed up in the warrior’s code of conduct, whether it be The Code of Chivalry or Bushido, along with many other behavioral expectations. Because of the feudal structure, bonds with lords, and code of conduct, knights and samurai can be considered extremely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knights Vs Samurai Dbq

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document E written by Sir Thomas Malory it says “ to be loyal to the king, to give mercy to those asking it…” In the piece “to give mercy to those asking it” meant that they would not hurt you if you asked for mercy. Therefore, if you were a knight and a samurai asked for mercy, you would not kill. Due to that belief, it gave the samurai’s an advantage. Also, in the same text it also mentions that the knights are to do no wicked deed. They could not do anything wrong or make a fool of themselves. It would not be right if they hurt…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In document E written By Yamaga Soko it says Outwardly he stands in Physical readiness for any call to service and inwardly he strives to fulfill the Way.” Samurais were physically and mentally ready. Samurais would be calm, but when they were called to fight, they were ready and would fight till the end. Another piece that shows that Samurais OR Knights could win is in document E also but written by Sir Thomas Malory. It states, ¨...Solemnly promising to do, not wicked deed, to be loyal to the king, to give mercy to those asking it.” Samurais were also loyal to their king(emperor), but knights gave mercy to anybody who was willing to ask for it. Knights were warriors in Europe but when they did not have to kill, they didn´t. They still fought at the best of their…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudalism started in both Japan and Europe at the same time, but does that mean that samurai and knights are the same? Feudalism is when the knight/samurai provide service for the lord, and in exchange, the lord provides land for the knight/samurai. Samurai and Knights: were the similarity greater than the differences? Samurai and knights were more similar than different in 3 broad areas; social position, training and armor, and honor and death.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social Position: The first area of important similarities was social position. They have a comparison of both of their lords, lesser lords, kings, both military, classes and peasants. These similarities are significant because both Samurai and knights showed great loyalty to their lords.The samurai warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment. According to Document A: Social Pyramids, with families the Samurai’s made up to 10%of Japan's…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai were a little higher up than Knights in the feudal social order. In the social order in feudal Japan if you were a Samurai you were a warrior who owed loyalty and military service to Dalmyos for land or regular payment. All of the Samurai plus their family made up about ten percent of Japans population. Now, Knights on the other hand were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to a lord for land. There were about twelve thousand Knights in England and Normany France in the twelfth century. (Documents A, B)…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In medieval Japan, the relationship between warriors and clan chiefs was very intense. An outcome of this feudal arrangement was a strict code of warrior behavior emerged known as Bushido (way of the warrior), which called upon warrior to sacrifice his life for his master. Such an act was thought of as the highest from of honor and respect. It was during the twelfth century that these warriors became known as samurai, meaning “those who serve.” Although the samurai were mainly soldiers, many excelled in the arts and philosophy. In these pursuits, the samurai normally showed the same type of discipline that characterized their martial…

    • 3342 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All woman out there if you want to protect yourself and not rely on a man then you should become a samurai but if you want protection and respect then marry a knight. During the Middle Ages in Feudal Japan and in Europe samurai and knights were two of the bravest warriors. It is important to compare these two because you can see who is more respectful or more powerful. Samurai were sent to defeat barbarians in Northern Honshu. Samurai worked for landowners and offered them protection and loyalty in exchange for land and rights. Knights lived in their lord's castle because they protected their lord. They lived in the lower floor of the castle with other knights because there was enough space there. In this essay I will compare the views on women of samurai and knights, the views on education of both warriors, and their code of conduct.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    European and Japanese feudalism were similar in that they had a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system. The Japanese classes were the shogun (similar to a king in Europe), who held all the power. Then the daimyo, who owned the land, (similar to the lords and nobles in Europe), divided their land to the lesser samurais (similar to the European knights), and the same to the peasants, artisans, farmers, and merchants (similar to the serfs in Europe). In both Europe and Japan, the hierarchy was held together as a land-for-loyalty exchange. Both Japanese and European feudalism was based on mutual obligation, but the Japanese problems of internal attacks led to them begin using a feudal system for military aspects, while the Europeans foreign invasions led to them begin using a feudal system to protect and economically grow.…

    • 566 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these warriors kept an oath of loyalty to their lords and to serve them, but samurai and knights had different obligations, codes, and contracts to follow. Samurai's loyalty to their lords were hereditary (Doc B). Meaning that their contract of loyalty to their lord could last many generations in their family. In contrast, the knights contract was not hereditary and only had to be served by the one who promised to (Doc B). This means that the knight’s family or son was not forced to serve their lord and would be able to discontinue the contract once the knight was done serving. Samurai and knights both had different expectations from each other. Samurais were expected to always put their duty first according to their code of Bushido. This included their family and own personal life. Loyalty and service was the focused point in a samurai's life (Doc E). Whereas knights focused on serving and helping everyone out and not just their lord, according to their code of Chivalry. They focused on being loyal to the king, showing mercy to those who need it, being polite and helpful, and doing no wrong (Doc E).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Europeans and the Japanese have many aspects of feudalism in common, but also many that differ. Their feudalisms are more differences than similarities. The differences include their cultural and political aspects. They have similarities in the social aspects.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    (AGG) Fighting for the welfare of their kingdom, knights have always been feared by their enemies. (BS-1) The training to become a knight and all the other activities he engaged in were very hard and required a lot of training. (BS-2) Feudalism and manorialism benefited knights, by giving them food and land in return for loyalty and protection. (BS-3) Feudalism also enabled the kingdom to build a functioning military. (BS-4) Lastly the church adapted and used the great chain of being to their advantage. (TS) Knight would affect feudalism by giving protection to the kingdom in exchange for food and land.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Body Paragraph#1: Both the Europeans and the Japanese had successful warriors that helped them succeed. In both feudal Japan and Europe, constant warfare made warriors the most important class. Called the “Knights” in Europe and “Samurai” in Japan, the warriors served their local lords. In both cases, Knight and Samurais were bound by a code of ethics. Knights were supposed to agree to the concept of Chivalry, while the Samurai were bound by the Bushido, or “The way of the warrior.” Both Knight and Samurai rode horses into battles, used swords, and wore armor. The European armor, which was worn by the knights, was usually all metal, made of chain, or plate metal. Japanese…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese Feudalism

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Western Europe and Japan used the feudal system from the 800s to the 1700s. The two regions show economic similarities, but differ greatly with respect to politics and society.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays