Preview

Kondracke and Vidal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
383 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kondracke and Vidal
Kondracke and Vidal Evaluation

In the article, “Don’t Legalize Drugs” by Morton M. Kondracke, writes on the pros and cons of the legalization of drugs in a convincing way to help the reader understand the ultimate downfall of our society if the legalization of drugs does come into effect. His convincing tone is brought together by his logical, outside resources, and predictions from credible doctors. His use of pathos also helps the reader have a deeper understanding of the serious problems of legalizing drugs. As Kondracke states in the beginning, “... if the advocates of legalized drugs do have their way…there will also be more unpublicized fatal and maiming crashes, more job accidents, more child neglect, more of almost everything associated with substance abuse: babies born addicted or retarded..” hoping to touch the hearts of the many. Kondracke uses outside resources such as Dr. Robert DuPont who is the former director of the National Institutes of Drug Abuse and his predictions to help further his argument and give credibility. Not only does he share with the reader outside sources and studies, but he mentions many examples by comparing the predictions of legalizing drugs and the actual result of alcohol in America and what effects it would have on our society if alcohol has already done so much to change America. The only real flaw I see with this article is that it is old and much in our society has changed. In the article, “Drugs: Case for Legalizing Marijuana” by Gore Vidal, his case for the legalization of marijuana is not quite convincing enough to even call it a case. Nothing in his article seems to be believable because he uses no real statistics except for his own when he says, “…I have tried—once—almost every drug and liked none disproving the popular Fu Manchu theory that a single whiff of opium will enslave the mind.” which doesn’t help his case at all seeing that he could have made up that side story on the spot. Not only does he share no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article entitled “Would Legalized Drugs Produce a Zombie Nation?”(Cederblorn and Paulsen, 332 - 334) written by Stephen Chapman. The author (Stephen Chapman) provides a clear details and analogy of the drug use and abuse in the American society. The article gave a picture of a theoretical view where the use of banned drugs is legitimized by the United States government. The unbelievable situation of having a legitimate way of circulating the proscribed drugs would create a lot of chaos in the communities and society in general.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In my writings I am going to be discussing the beliefs of James Q. Wilson and Douglas N. Husak. They both have very different views on drugs, Wilson is more of the conservative who believes drugs should be banned altogether, as opposed to Husak, who believes the use of drugs should be a personal choice. First, I am going to talk about James Q. Wilson and his views against the legalization of drugs. One of Wilsons claims is that the lack of availability would lead to less drug use and addiction. Wilson believes that if drugs were to be legalized then it will be easier for addicts to recruit other people into trying new drugs.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1301 Eng

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two articles being discussed are on the topic of drug legalization, having my own opinion, what I’ve done is become completely open minded on the subject and only will judge the argumentative skills of the authors. Organizing it by article, I will review at the end of each analysis if the reader would have swayed my opinion. Judging on the use of ethos, pathos and logos to determine if the two authors give valid argument on Drug Legalization and the effects it would have on society, I will state which author has a higher chance to persuade the reader.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At first Vidal starts off with the argument that why illegalization of drugs would not be able to accomplish the task it strives for, which is obstruct the drug addiction and trafficking. Vidal does that by endowing with examples of him of how even after trying each and every type of drug; Vidal did not get addicted or adapt the habit of drugs. Vidal places all the irrational fears and trepidations such as “if everyone is allowed to take drugs everyone will and the GNP will decrease, the Commies will stop us from making everyone free, and we shall end up a race of Zombies, passively murmuring "groovie" to one another .” He carries on with endowing diverse arguments of how the drug prevention might be employed rather than illegalizing drugs.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the documentary, The Union: The Business Behind Getting High, the argument being made is that there was no reason for the prohibition of marijuana. It starts off by explaining how hemp, the cannabis plant, was used as such a reliable resource before it was illegal. Parts of hemp were used for food, paper, fuels, and fabric. This was not only a resource that was able to be expanded easily, but it was an overall better quality, and lasted longer. Many people, however, did not want to believe this. For example, one of the logical fallacies presented is that smoking marijuana makes you lose brain cells. The people who were for prohibition did not know what the experiment done even was. Scientists tested this theory on monkeys, and while it was told that only thirty joints were administered per day for a year, they actually pumped sixty-three colombian strength joints, without additional oxygen, through a gas mask within 5 minutes over three months. If it was not obvious, the masks literally suffocated the monkeys and the only reason their brain cells died is because that is the first thing to go when you are short on breath. The studies about how marijuana actually stimulates brain cells did not go over well either, and many other studies that were carelessly conducted, such as saying it causes lung cancer, were never proven.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Bennett Drugs

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In William J. Bennett’s argument, Drugs: Should their Sale and Use Be Legalized, he tries to persuade the readers that drugs should not be legalized. He goes on to explain the national drug policy and the intellectuals that by and large are against it but have little to contribute to the matter. The argument like he says is a little one sided, there is a whole lot to say about the national drug policy and very little to say about the intellectuals.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    So far this is good. However, Wilson also claims that keeping heroin and cocaine illegal contains the number of users, and so prevents a great number of harm. This is where I disagree. In Douglas Husak's, "Why we should decriminalize drug use", he argues against Wilson's claims. If frequency of drug use is a function of cost, then use will go up when as the cost goes down. and it is also true that economic models claim that cost will drop after decriminalization and would have an increase in use. But the predictions of cost and use after decriminalization assume that nothing else will change. However, many other things will change that could raise the price, reduce the use, and reduce the amount of harm that results from use. Therefore, the prediction of soaring use and harm is unsupported.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The cannabis plant has been the topic of much debate throughout the history of this country. It was actually originally the work of the cotton industry who put big money behind illegalization for the plant 's mind altering effects. The cotton industry was afraid that hemp, a product of the cannabis plant, would soon overpower the strong hold of cotton since it was a more durable textile that required less work, less ground depletion, and could be grown almost anywhere. Since the time when cannabis first became illegal it has been grouped with other narcotics as a counterpart. The truth is cannabis has many benefits to society and other than the effects of…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Noel Merino Drugs

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We want what we can’t have. Much like the prohibition in the 1920’s, history is repeating itself as our country becomes divided on the issue of marijuana legalization. In fact, there are many comparisons between marijuana and alcohol use in today’s society making us wonder whether or not marijuana should be legal. In an article written by Noel Merino titled, “Research Shows That Marijuana Use Is Safer Than Alcohol Use”, many comparisons are made pointing towards marijuana as a safer substance than alcohol despite its criminalization. Merino’s argument overflows with statistics on alcohol, but lacks in several areas. Although, there is plenty of evidence, the argument lacks any emotional appeal and includes unaddressed assumptions, false…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These days, a person hears a lot about legalizing marijuana and why it could be beneficial for our country, but people forget why it was illegalized in the first place. Marijuana is a drug. Drugs are addictive and deadly. If we legalize marijuana now, we'll end up with a generation of reefer addicts who die by their mid-30s if they manage to escape being the victims of violent crime. Also, the people who use marijuana now despite the fact that it is illegal clearly are people who see no issue with breaking the law, so it's safe to assume they would still be criminals otherwise. Marijuana addicts are violent criminals. Out of 20 violent criminals in Richland County Prison, 19 of them admitted to having tried marijuana. This is no coincidence. "How many murders, suicides, robberies, criminal assaults, holdups, burglaries and deeds of maniacal insanity it causes each year, especially among the young, can only be conjectured...No one knows, when he places a marijuana cigarette to his lips, whether he will become a joyous reveller in a musical heaven, a mad insensate, a calm philosopher, or a murderer..." (The American Magazine, pg 18).…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legalizing of marijuana raises health concerns through the general public. However, the people who do not know the rise and the potency of marijuana, as well as, how it damages one’s body perceptually, which at the end will have drastic consequences. For instance, as Roni continues she mentions that teenagers who are addicted to the drug are the ones who are more at risk to have damage done to them in the frontal cortex. First, as they, the adolescences, use marijuana they essentially are “hooked” on the drug, without proper treatment they will stay on the cannabis as an addict. Moreover, when it comes to their mentality rate of the brain the function of it decreases tremendously on being able to comprehend the world around them than compared to any adult that uses the drug. Furthermore, as Roni continues on with the harm marijuana does to adolescences she points out that if legalization of the drug took place then the teenagers would have an easier way to get access to the potent cannabis. Likewise, for the people don’t see marijuana as a threat-Roni assures them that introducing it to underage teenagers would be an immoral notion and it would be better for everyone to inform adolescences when they become adults. Although people hardly care for the legalization of marijuana they are not aware of the harm it does to the teenagers as well as the adults who consume the potent drug will have a drastic change intellectually.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enlgish

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In an article called “Drugs” by Gore Vidal. Vidal makes a strong case for legalizing all drugs in this country. He discusses basic human nature and events to make his claim. Basically Gore makes three main points about drug use. He tells the reader that making drugs illegal does not stop drug addiction and trafficking, why legalized drugs would work, and why legalization is still unlikely to occur. My own view on the legalizing of drugs does not agree with Vidal.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legally Blind

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “Legally Blind: Why I’m Against Legalizing Marijuana” is an internet article on the Huffington Post’s website written by Dr. Howard Samuels. Dr. Howard Samuels is a licensed therapist who is currently the CEO of The Hills Treatment Center, a substance abuse treatment facility in Los Angeles, CA. He holds a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology and is a Marriage and Family Therapist, specializing in addiction (Samuels). His article, “Legally Blind: Why I’m Against Legalizing Marijuana”, is to be presented as an opinionated article that explains why he is against legalizing the use of both recreational and medicinal marijuana. However, he is not against the decriminalization of the two. His irrational belief is that one should be able to possess the…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Drugs

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When properly informed, most Americans make sound decisions. The challenge is to ensure that our citizens understand that illegal drugs greatly harm both individuals and society. All of us need to recognize that drug use limits human potential. We must make a convincing case that the negative consequences of drug abuse far outweigh any perceived…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legalization of Marijuana

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Proponents for the legalization of marijuana offer several valid reasons to support their positions. The most common reason is that marijuana is proven to be no more harmful to a person’s body then legal drugs, alcohol and tobacco. They believe that the marijuana only affects the mind for a short term and the long-term effects are only minor. Lawyers Adam Ford and Andrew Walter concur, “ Arguments against legalizing marijuana can usually be applied with equal validity to legal substances such as alcohol and tobacco: alcohol and tobacco can be addictive, can lead to financial or social problems when used in excess, and can lead to serious health problems” (1). These two well recognized attorneys agree that marijuana should be treated the same as tobacco and alcohol because most of the reasons opponents give to not legalize marijuana all fall under bad aspects of those…

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays