Preview

Korematsu V. the United States (1944)

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
250 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Korematsu V. the United States (1944)
Graded Assignment

Korematsu v. the United States (1944)

Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions.

(5 points)

What prompted the sudden outpouring of racial prejudice against Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl Harbor?

Answer:

(5 points)

What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?

Answer:

(5 points)

According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?

Answer:

(5 points)

The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?

Answer:

(5 points)

Who determined that the military authorities had the power to segregate all citizens of Japanese descent from the West Coast?

Answer:

(5 points)

What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities?

Answer:

(5 points)

The dissenting opinion raises the fact that Japanese Americans were being deprived of what rights?

Answer:

(5 points)

One argument that the dissenting justices make is that you cannot conclude an entire group will be disloyal just because what?

Answer:

(10 points)

Which opinion in this case—the majority or dissenting—do you believe was the right one and why?

Answer:

-----------------------

|Name: Elijah Laws |Date: 2/3/2014 |

|Score |
| |

|Score |
| |

|Score |
| |

|Score |
|

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    4. I disagree with this court decision because I think this was a violation of the fourteenth amendment made by the Supreme Court. I understand why the justices decided as they did, but their duty was…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Japanese-Americans were citizens of the United States and residences within the country, they did not have equivalent rights during this time in history. “The Constitution makes him a citizen of the United States by nativity and a citizen of California by residence. No claim is made that he is not loyal to this country.” Many Japanese-Americans were being treated as if they had been disloyal to the US and even alienated because of how they looked. Also, the freedom to own land was taken from them as well. “The Federal Reserve Banks took charge of property owned by evacuees, while the Farm Security Administration took over the agricultural property.” Owning property is one of the greatest freedoms and American can uphold and as history has shown it can easily be taken away in an instant. Japanese-Americans were forced to sell everything because they were very limited in what they could take with them to the internment…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smart, Chris. "Rights Violated to Japanese Americans." Rights Violated to Japanese Americans. Senate Publication 1028-s ( P. 30-34), 02 May 2000. Web. 01 May 2014. http://online.sfsu.edu/jaintern/rightsviolated.html…

    • 1908 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive Order 9066

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First and foremost, the 4th amendment prohibits the unreasonable searching or seizing. These american citizens had no reason to be suspected other than their ancestry. The government was hysteria fueled and decided the place them in camps away from the public. They unreasonably displaced and transferred the japanese to these camps and blatantly disregarded their 4th amendment rights in the process.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Justice Frank Murphy stated, “Such exclusion goes over "the very brink of constitutional power," and falls into the ugly abyss of racism.” In Justice Robert Jackson’s dissent, he said, “The Constitution makes him a citizen of the United States by nativity, and a citizen of California by residence” defending Korematsu’s rights. This decision favors federal…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of Japanese-descent that were living in the United States at the time. Not only was this…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court only wanted what was best for society during this time. The majority ruling of the case…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice Murphy stated that the orders were a violation of the Constitution, because they were discriminatory and deprived American citizens from their rights. In order for the laws to take away constitutional rights, is to have the danger of not having the laws imminent. In Justice Murphy’s opinion, the danger was no imminent so the orders were unconstitutional. Also, Justice Murphy said the orders were in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Justice Murphy stated that the Japanese-Americans did not receive due process, another violation of rights.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, not all Japanese-Americans took kindly to this intrusion of their basic liberties. For example, Fred Korematsu refused to go to the…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So since, “For over 50 years… Americans has seen newcomers from Japan… as a threat to the ‘American standard of living’ (Myths, Prejudices, and War).” Being viewed as a threat automatically caused the Japanese to be seen as a liability to Americans and put the Japanese-Americans at a huge disadvantage. The Japanese Americans were not treated equally because of the previously formed bias judgements formed against them by Americans which was shown through “state and local laws [that] reflected the belief that people of Asian descent were inferior (Myths, Prejudices, and War).” Changes in the law against a certain ethnicity violates the 14th amendment which states that American citizens who should have been treated with the same rights that Caucasian American citizens were treated…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese internment camps. Justice Hugo Black stated that although the exclusion order imposed hardships upon a large number of Japanese-American citizens, hardships are part of war. Justice Black goes on to say that the curtail of the civil rights of a single racial group should immediately be suspect and be looked into (Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214).That courts should subject any law that infringes on the civil rights of a racial group should be looked under the most scrutiny like as if they were looking at it threw a micro scope. Justice Black also goes on to say that when under the conditions of warfare and our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect them must be commensurate with the threatened danger.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately the court claimed that they could not take the case because they could only hear cases from certain groups for a specific set of claims and that based off of the constitution-…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics