'Radicalism' supports their claim that the KKK wasn't racist with the fact that much of the violence it's members inflicted was against whites. However, what this article ignores is that many of the whites attacked by the KKK were attacked because they were sympathetic to the cause of non-whites; some openly supported racial equality, or married individuals of color, or were friendly with non-whites, In the eyes of the KKK, these individuals forfeited the protection that being white had afforded them when they began to show support for any non-white person. As for 'Radicalism's' claim that the KKK was non-violent, those too can be refuted using facts. The KKK performed lynchings, kidnappings, intimidation and many more acts of terror in order to gain power and generate fear. These acts are undeniably and unnecessarily brutal, and any claim that the KKK was anything but violent is gravely
'Radicalism' supports their claim that the KKK wasn't racist with the fact that much of the violence it's members inflicted was against whites. However, what this article ignores is that many of the whites attacked by the KKK were attacked because they were sympathetic to the cause of non-whites; some openly supported racial equality, or married individuals of color, or were friendly with non-whites, In the eyes of the KKK, these individuals forfeited the protection that being white had afforded them when they began to show support for any non-white person. As for 'Radicalism's' claim that the KKK was non-violent, those too can be refuted using facts. The KKK performed lynchings, kidnappings, intimidation and many more acts of terror in order to gain power and generate fear. These acts are undeniably and unnecessarily brutal, and any claim that the KKK was anything but violent is gravely