Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Kuka Movement

Good Essays
2097 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kuka Movement
Kuka Movement 1857

During the pre-independence days, the British followed the policy of ‘Devide and Rule’. It was their strategy to become offensive against the roots of Indian culture. During those days, so many Butcherkhanas (Slaughter houses) in different parts of Punjab. During the days of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, there was total ban on cow slaughter. When British annexed Punjab, they printed these words on copper plates –
“COW are not to be killed in Amritsar. The Penalty of killing cow is death.”
But with passing times, the British opened slaughter houses, because theythemselves used to eat beef – the meat of cow. This was challenge to the sikhi – self – respect. On 5th May 1849, the British administration allowed the slaughter for each meat of the cows. In 20th May, 1849, Governor General declared an ordinance in this connection. According to this ordinance –
“No one should be allowed to interfere with the practice by his neighbor of customs which that neighbour’s religion either enjoying or permits.”
Christian mentality of the British Government was the reason behind the attacks on Indian culture. It increased the social tension between different sections. During those days every section of the society, panth, mazhab, and representative had consultations with each other and solved the problem of cow slaughter. But opposite to this, English deputy commissioner called a meeting of residents of Amritsar and conveyed this message that co slaughter would be continued. At that time muslim representatives took U-turn and they supported the British Government for opening butcherkhanas. The ground reality was that these decisions had polluted the social fabric.
When news of opening of Butcherkhana in Amritsar reached the ears of Namdharis Singhs, who were residing nearby. After that whole class of Namdharis got agitated over the issue of cow slaughter. According to Namdhari concept of “MARAN GAOO GARIB NOON DHARTI UPPAR PAP BITHARA”, this news of cow slaughter was a social evil and this had to be eradicated. Kukas (Namdharis) were full of spirit of Guru Nanak. These lines were famous among them –
“EH MALECH LUDANON AYE,
ENA BUTCHERKHANEY LAYE.
SANOO DUKH GAOO DA KHAYE,
SINGHO SIS DEN HUN AVE,
NAYE KARTAR DE.”
First a butcherkhana was opened near Shri Harmandir Sahib Parikarma. Beef was openly sold in the city. The vultures used to dived near slaughter house and used to took away bone and filthy rotten meat. Fall of bone or meat from the mouth of the vultures in the holy Amrit – Sarovar of Shri Harmandir Sahib. During that period, those close to the British Government were remained silence. Then Kukas opposed the Butcherkhanas. They started a movement against co slaughter. Englishmen tried to convince the sikh masses that everyone came under the English law; but Namdharis rejected all this and challenged the establishment. After, seeing the activities of the Kuka activists, Lieutenant Governor of Punjab gave warning and wrote letter to D.I.G.
On 28th July 1871 the Lieutenant Governor wrote to Colonel J.C.P. Baillie, D.I.G. of Police Lahore circle that –
Ram Singh and his Subas to be put under secret surveillance.
“The Lieutenant Governor desires you to arrange that Baba Ram Singh Kooka and his vizirs (Subas) be kept under surveillance and their movements watched and reported. This is to be done by men in plain clothes and no restriction of any kind put on those under this surveillance. In fact, those should not be aware that they are watched.”
Namdharis, not tolerating the desecration of sikh religions place and disrespect of sikh religion, decided to teach Englishmen a lesson. Because Namdharis totally boycotted the Government. This non-cooperation movement of Namdharis had awaken the Sikhs as a whole. Placing same objective in the from and not tolerating desecration of holy Amrit Sarovar, the Kuka Singhs attacked the Butcherkhana on the night of 14-15 June 1871. Butchers were killed in that attached. Cows were freed. In that way, slaughter house was destroyed completely and that was beginning of the anti cow slaughter movement. Singhs met Baba Ram Singh ji maharaj and told him the whole story. When Namdharis told the Maharaj ji that in our place some Hindu-Sikh and Nihang Sikhs were arrested and they will certainly get hanged, then Bana ji said, “Why someone suffer from the deeds of ours. It is not bravery. Go to the Kutchery and surrender there. The way you have freed the cows, go and free the Hindu-sikhs.” After that these Namdharis Singh produced themselves in the session court and gave proof of their bravery.
Mr. Chriktee fabricated the case in the court, wrongly investigated the case, false eye-witnesses were produced. Court gave order of handing to the Kuka Singhs. This way we came through shameful history of the British Government.
Those Namdharis, who freed the innocent people, expressed their last desires after listening the order of handing –
1. On the day of hanging, they will come to be hanged after taking bath in the sarovar of Shri Harmandir Sahib and reciting Gurbani.
2. No use of leather made noose. Instead of that a silk rope should be used.
3. We will ourselves wear the noose.
So, on 15th September 1871 Mistsy Baba, Baba Lahina Singh, Baba Fateh Singh Bhatra, Baba Hakama Singh Patwari and Baba Bahilla Singh were hanged.
Whole Punjab stood up against cow slaughter. Kuka Singh opposed the cow slaughter in Raikot Distt. Ludhiana. They closed the slaughter houses in Raikot. In the night of 15th July, 1871, Kukas attacked the Butcherkhanas of Raikot. They two butchers in mean process and seven singhs got wounded, cows were freed. Government informer Dalbir Singh of village Chiniwal informed the police. After this event, Saint Mastan Singh, Saint Mangal Singh, Saint Gurumukh Singh were arrested. On 27th July 1871, in the session court of Judge J. W. Makneith of Ambala Division a case – State Vs. Saint Mastan Singh, Gurumukh Singh, Mangal Singh, had started. At the end case reached High Court. On 1stAughst 1871, Chief Court of Punjab gave judgement. On 5 August 1871, Kukas got hanged.
D.C. of Ludhiana Mr. Kavin’s report no. 180 dated 20th July, 1871 stated that –
“Definitely murders were the work of Kuka. But I doubt whether this was ordered by Baba Ram Singh to the Kukas.”
Kukas believed in serving poor and needy and fighting for the cause of cow & poor. They fought valiantly against all odds. They never stepped backward. They sacrificed their life. They were fighting for their self – respect. “SURA SO PAICHANIYE JU LARE OEEN KE HET,
PURJA PURJA KAT MAREY KABHU NA CHADE KHET”
- (SHALOK KABIRJI, Page 1105)
Deputy Inspector General of Police of Punjab was of the opinion that ifuprising of the Sikhs were not suppressed mercilessly, they would prove headache for the British Government. Suba Giani Rattan Singh Mandi Wala was a great Namdhari Scholar. He was a great orator. After the episodes of cow slaughter houses, Baba Ram Singh ji Maharaj ordered to boycott the British courts and kutcherys. That is why in the case of Raikot, Giani Rattan Singh mandi wala and Bhai Rattan Singh of Naiwal got the death sentences under section of IPC 109, 302 which were simply based on false and lies of witnesses. Judgement was given by the judge Lindsey on 23 November 1871.
In the modern Indian History the Kuka movement opposing cow slaughter against the Britishers is a golden chapter. On 26 November 1871, outside the Ludhiana Jail, there were thousands of people gathered, where Giani Rattan Singh Mandiwala and his associates were to be given death sentences. Majority Hindu community saw this Ghalughara with their open eyes. For Hindus, cow slaughter is considered as greatest sin on earth. How will Hindus of the Nation take this episode of Namdhari movement and learn something out of it, is yet to be seen.
In the present political scenario the main spirit of Namdhari movement is being totally ignored by the Nehruvians and leftists. Muslim favouring political parties have no interest in this ideology. It is more surprising that Shiromani Akali Dal is also ignoring it. But this issue remains in the minds of Punjabis that in a farmer’s family cow is considered as family member. Farmer of Punjab can not live without cows and dairy products. The rural sports of Punjab has a compulsory and important ingredient is ‘Bull’. This basic spirit should be honoured by Shiromani Akali Dal. Kuka Movement, that opposed cow slaughter, was a national movement. We should see it only in the national perspective. It is strange that Hindu society shows insensitivity towards anti cow slaughter movement of Namdharis. May be the reason behind it is regional, cast equation or pathetic. This disease has to be cured properly. If whole Indian society stands in favour of cow slaughter ban, it will be in favour of the country. For reassessment of the history and learning from it is very necessary for the society. The martyrdom day of these historic personalities should be celebrated. It inspires the society and new generation in particular. In fact sikh history is the history of sacrifices. NAMDHARI HISTORY – GREAT SACRIFICE Namdhari Sikhs founded great heights spiritually. They became mature human being due to RAHAT MARYADA. They believed in the philosophy of SWADESHI. They organized themselves. They brought forward the political agenda against Britishers. They gave sleepless nights to the Britishers. On 18thJanuary, 1872, Baka Ram Singh ji and his Subas were exiled from India and sent to Rangoon.
Baba Ram Singh was first saint to Paryagraj (Allahabad) fort from Ludhiana. Associate Secretary, W.M. Sauther wrote in his report-
“I am sending Baba Ram Singh Kuka and his companions under Bengal Regulation – 3 Act 1818 under section 11 warrant. Punjab Government has sent them to Allahabad.”
British Government terrified so much from Baba Ram Singh ji, that Chief Commissioner of Barma wrote –
“He is a very dangerous man, may be he is the most dangerous one among Indians and there should be ban on his letters coming out of the Jail.”
Baba Ram Singh ji was with Bhai Nanoo Singh Garhwai, Bhai Gurdut Singh Gaddewala, Suba Sahib Singh, Baba Jawahar Singh. Later, Suba Sahib Singh and Baba Kahan Singh was shifted to Hazaribagh Jail to give more stringent punishments. On 21st May 1875, in an official report, it was written that Suba Sahib had a painful disease. On 10th June, 1879 Suba Sahib Singh died in Hazaribagh Jail.
British Government was in search of an excuse to ban Namdharis. The Saka of Malerkotla gave them this opportunity. They exiled Baba Ram Singh ji to Rangoon (Berma). Other Subas were sent to the jails of Margoi, Asirgarh, Aden, Chunar and Hazaribagh, where they were martyred. Main centre of the Namdharis “Shri Bhaini Sahib” had a polic station inside its premise. Police Station remained there for next 51 years. Only five people at a time was allowed to go inside of Shri Bhaini Sahib.
In those days Namdharis were treated as criminals. Government started to demand bails for their good conducts under Criminal Procedure Act X, Section 504-505 of 1872. If they did not secure the bail bond, they had to pay penalties or face arrests.
In encyclopaedia of Britanica Ed. 1902, the Namdharis were projected as follows :-
1. Kuka never speaks lie.
2. Kuka never drinks.
3. Kuka is hardline sikh of Guru Gobind Singh.
4. Kuka can not be loyal to the Englishmen. Shaheed Bhagat Singh wrote in his article ‘Mahan Kuka Laher’ as follows –
“Baba Ram Singh started a non-cooperation movement, which was adopted by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920. His movement of non-cooperation was far greater than Mahatma Gandhi’s movement in so many ways.”
Akali Master Tara Singh wrote that “Nobody can deny this that they consolidated the spirit of Gurus among the Sikhs and by starting a movement of non-cooperation against Britishers, they teached us the lesson of patriotism.”
Bhai Parmanand ji wrote that – “If everybody shed the cooperation with the Britishers, the Raj will go away. This hypothesis was invented by Namdhari Baba Ram Singh ji.”
In 1938, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru wrote in his ‘Satyug’ – “To secure freedom of our motherland Baba Ram Singh ji did glorious hard work about three fourth century back; no Indian can deny this. Congress followed the path shown by you and succeeded.”
Famous writer Khushwant Singh wrote that – “Namdhari Sikhs have a special and important place in the history of Independence of India. They were founder and father figure of, who used non-cooperation and swadeshi as a political weapon.”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The company gained permission from the Mughal Empire to build forts on the coastlines for the trading agents to store commodities and transport back to Europe. As the Mughal Empire weakened; The East India Company took advantage of this weakness the merchants began campaigns to conquest India. They won official rule of Mughal officials and local authority then they enforced their rule with a small British army and a large number of Indian troops known as sepoys. A very violent revolt against British rule by the sepoys would begin. The sepoys would receive rifles that fired bullets from cartridges. The cartridges would be wrapped in a wax made from animal fat and the British officials would advise them to ripe the wax with their teeth. The sepys would refuse out of fear that the wax was made from cows that were held sacred and the Muslim sepoys refused because it could be made from pigs which where held foul. The sepoys would then have a mutiny in 1857 where they killed their British officers and tried to restore Mughal authority. The revolt was very violent and many were killed but in 1858, British government had restored their direct rule in India. Even though the revolt was violent, under the British administration, officials began to encourage the cultivation of crops and built railroads and telegraph networks that then would link India to the global economy. They also…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in India when the British took full control, and then being forced to change your day to day life. The british had an economic interest in India which started during the 1600’s. During the Industrial Revolution, India was considered a prized possession by the British because they supplied raw materials to the factories for production. Eventually, the British took full control of India, and made some major changes that significantly impacted India. Although the British had a negative economic impact on India, they had a positive impact on both the political and social aspects of India. The British were able to set a foundation for India, and create a justice system while containing violence, even though they had to take away some Indian rights to do so.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On one hand the sources suggest the Amritsar Massacre did create hostility among Indians towards the British, with the British government being portrayed as repressive and irresponsible. However, the alternative view presented by the sources is that Indians were not hostile towards the British, but they were in fact appreciative of their help and did not feel that they were repressive.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    - Although adopted a hands-off policy regarding Indian religious/social customs, presence of missionaries and racist attitude threatened traditional life…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Namit Arora promotes his views on the meat industry in regards to the treatment of animals. He details the brutal and horrific experiences that each animal must endure for the sole purpose of ending up on someone’s plate. Arora analyzes society’s back-handedness in feeling sorrow and care for only specific animals. Arora develops ideas ¬¬that society is being insincere in our care for animals, when we only put up certain animals to idolize, and have created a system which kills animals for our demands. Arora’s…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, the expression of all of the Indian’s resistance was seen as rebellious and deemed as imprudent choices. Now after full consideration, one can see that that was their only way out, and how anything other than rebellious acts would have just lead to greater and greater events of violence inflicted upon them. Therefore, the conclusions behind Indian’s reasoning’s have changed over time to the point where now it is understandable why they reacted and tried to put a stop to the abuse before it got…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “No longer will the will the worn-out horse wend his way to the boneyard; instead he will be fattened up in order to give the thrifty another source of food supply. This new meat is to be put upon the city’s platter under the protection and encouragement of the Board of Health. The Board at its meeting yesterday made several radical changes in the Sanitary Code, and one of them was to revoke the present section that forbids the sale in this city of horse flesh as food.” (Allow Horse Meat for Food in City)…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Note that Sikh “eyewitness” versions of event have been included. Without the reports of independent observers due to total press censorship by the Indian government, these versions of events became quite significant in forming the general opinion and reaction of Sikhs.…

    • 5520 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hindu festival in honor of the goddess Gahjimai is held every five years in Nepal, where 250,000 calves will be decapitated in center square for sacrifice. The dead animals will then be sold to companies who will make a profit. Before the carnage of Gahjimai, the Hindu’s also practice the…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, the EIC offended the Hindus religion. In 1856, there was a new law which…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events of the Indian mutiny; in particular the Enfield rifle cartridges, the murder of Christians, the shootings in Cawnpore and the massacre in Lucknow, vastly changed the presence of British in India. The British realised that they could not run a country through a company with no acknowledgement and respect for culture.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sepoy Rebellion

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    At first, the power that Britain had over India was that of an indirect rule, where they elected a local official who promised to stay loyal to Britain. In addition, the British East India Company, those with the rule of India at the time, established a military regime called the Sepoys who were loyal to the British and helped keep the Indian people in line. However, things could not always stay like this, especially when the people meant to stay loyal to Britain the most rebelled against them. The Sepoy Rebellion began because of the British using pig and cow fat on the ammunition cartilages, which are both animals that are forbidden to be consumed in the Muslim and Hindu faith. The Sepoys, who were expected to ripe off the ammunition paper before loading their guns saw this as a clear form of disrespect towards their religious beliefs. Although the rebellion led to many deaths on both parts of the battle, the Indians turned out losing when the British managed to suppress the rebellion. Since the British were fed up with the violence and disobedience in their empire the British East India Company lost all political control of the nation, the original empires, like the Mughal, were dissolved of all political power and the local officials who had been put into power were now exchanged for native British men. This all…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Great Britain and other European countries have killed millions of cows over the past 15 years to prevent two diseases from spreading. The first disease is Foot-and-Mouth disease. The second disease is Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), also known a Mad cow disease. Mad cow disease is a brain disorder in adult cattle that may spread to humans through diseased cow products.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sepoy Rebellion

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The commencement of this rebellion started during the British Imperialistic take over in India. After acquiring sixty-six percent of the Indian land, they started dominating the Indian way of life, affecting their culture, education, religion, technology, etc. This created a lot of tension between the two nations. What set the Indians off to finally start the revolt? Thenagain.info states that “The "spark" that came to begin this period of revolts was the introduction of the new, more accurate breech-loading Enfield rifle. The loading of these rifles entailed the biting of a greased cartridge, which the Sepoys feared was made with either cow or pig fat.” The Hindu Sepoys saw this as an attempt to break their caste as a preliminary to making them all Christians” The Indians saw this as an insult and felt absolutely disgusted as eating beef, pork, cows, and other meats are considered haram- meaning forbidden or displeasing God. This was the biggest of the various incidents that occurred therefore making it the catalyst for the revolt.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, most of the sepoys were Muslims who don’t eat pork and Hindus who considers cow sacred. Therefore, British didn’t show respect to their culture, but ignored them. For this reason, sepoys refused to accept the cartridges. Then British jailed the disobeyed soldiers, but this action was improperly and led to the sepoys rebelled. Sepoy rebellion was one of the fist attempts of the Indians to rid India of foreign dominance. It led to the rise of nationalism in India and the desire for independence. Furthermore, in 1919, Indians wanted to protest Britain peacefully in Amritsar, but unfortunately, British commander felt nervous about the protest of Indians, then he decided to fire the crowded. This event was known as Amritsar Massacre. It caused many Indian felt angry to the British government and changed their loyalty to British into nationalism. Amritsar Massacre gave Gandhi a chance to become a leader of the independence, and he played an important role on against British imperialism. He urged the Indian National Congress to endorse a policy called civil disobedience, which was to refuse an unjust law by nonviolence actions. For…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics