Breed. “Twenty-six people he had on his conscience!”
“The mind reels,” I said (Vonnegut 29).
A scientist who helped create the atomic bomb that killed tens of thousands of people sees a problem with a man who killed twenty-six people. The absence of abstract ideals in society creates an environment with no concern of life or other humans. And, as Vonnegut applies, the continuation of the ignorance and lack of abstract concepts is what facilitates the continuity of destructive science projects. Science is used by Vonnegut to poke fun at the foolishness of science and humanities inability to figure out the very real and potential dangers from past …show more content…
The hook represents mankind's blurred perception of the effectiveness of the death penalty. Vonnegut, who believes that all life is precious, implies that the capability of the punishment is not effective since we live in an indifferent universe. Killing one person will not change the way that the world works, but, as Vonnegut believes, loving each other can change the world since man is the essence of the universe. The idea that the universe is indifferent to mankind is the deceptive force that allows humans to continue to make the mistake of applying the death penalty. Vonnegut’s mockery of the death penalty goes along with the Crosby’s experience in London in the Chamber of Horrors. Not only did the Crosby’s see a wax figure of a person hanging from a hook, but they also saw a man who had been electrocuted for murdering his son. Vonnegut’s satirization comes with Hazel Crosby’s revelation when she states, “Only, after they roasted him, they found out he hadn’t murdered his son after all” (Vonnegut 95). This aspect of wasting human life, especially doing so wrongfully, reveals a flawed justice system in an indifferent universe. The careless universe plays into the fact that we continue to make the same mistake of killing people, sometimes without probable cause. Despite the