He claims that the traditional method of understanding the causes and uses of suicide terrorism are no longer sufficient and a new manner of thinking must be adopted. To pave the way for his logic of suicide terrorism he argues there are five principles to understand. Suicide terrorism is strategic, it’s designed to coerce modern democracies to make concessions, terrorists have learned that it works and thus have used it more over the last twenty years, using it as a tactic for their most ambitious goals doesn’t work, and the only way to reduce it is to reduce terrorists’ confidence in its effectiveness. For the purposes of his article, Pape trichotomizes terrorism into three groups: demonstrative, destructive, and suicide. Demonstrative terrorism is conducted with the goal of gathering publicity and drawing attention to their cause. They can use this to draw new supporters, pressure their opposition, etc. Destructive actions aim to coerce the enemy and draw support (through mobilization) for their cause as well. Finally, suicide terrorism acts as a combination of the other two to the most extreme end. It has the greatest public impact and often is the most destructive as
He claims that the traditional method of understanding the causes and uses of suicide terrorism are no longer sufficient and a new manner of thinking must be adopted. To pave the way for his logic of suicide terrorism he argues there are five principles to understand. Suicide terrorism is strategic, it’s designed to coerce modern democracies to make concessions, terrorists have learned that it works and thus have used it more over the last twenty years, using it as a tactic for their most ambitious goals doesn’t work, and the only way to reduce it is to reduce terrorists’ confidence in its effectiveness. For the purposes of his article, Pape trichotomizes terrorism into three groups: demonstrative, destructive, and suicide. Demonstrative terrorism is conducted with the goal of gathering publicity and drawing attention to their cause. They can use this to draw new supporters, pressure their opposition, etc. Destructive actions aim to coerce the enemy and draw support (through mobilization) for their cause as well. Finally, suicide terrorism acts as a combination of the other two to the most extreme end. It has the greatest public impact and often is the most destructive as