On 06/27/16, Mr. Newsome submitted to a random drug screen. On 07/09/16, the test was returned positive for Amphetamines. Mr. Newsome was placed on contract with Crest Aftercare in February. RP briefed supervisor Henderson on this case. Approval was given to arrest Mr. Newsome. RP briefed Officer Williams, Dagley and Rahman. Officer Rahman handcuffed and searched Mr. Newsome. Mr. Newsome had a cell phone, keys and his wallet in his possession. Mr. Newsome had a total of $45.00 (2 $20.00 bills and 1 $5.00 bill) dollars. Mr. Newsome was transported by Officer Williams and Dagley to Smyrna Correction without incident. Admin Warrant was sent to Kent County Superior Court and Faxed to Central…
Violation 2: On 02/21/2009 Mr. Machjokowski was found to be in possession of drug paraphernalia when Parole Officer Thomas made a home call, due to Mr. Machjokowski not showing up for a weekly meeting. No drugs were found on the subject; however we did find a device used for smoking marijuana on the subject. Officer Pasztor of the Orange County Police has entered this into their evidence room, awaiting any trial, and is willing to testify to this.…
On March 7th, 1980, two high school freshman were found smoking in the bathroom at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, NJ. The students were escorted to the vice principal Mr. Choplick’s office. The defendant, TLO, who was one of the students that were caught smoking denied the accusation. Mr. Choplick inspected TLO’s purse and found a box of cigarettes. Afterward removing the box of cigarettes, he saw a pack of rolling papers. Mr. Choplick suspected that a closer examination of the purse may yield evidence of drug use and that a thorough inspection would be needed. After a thorough search, he found a small amount of marijuana, a pipe, a number of empty plastic bags, a large amount one dollar bills, an index card with a list of who…
In Minnesota vs. Timothy Dickerson, two police officers parked in an unmarked car, outside of an apartment building known for trafficking contraband substances, did willfully and knowingly stop and frisk respondent due to suspicious and evasive behavior, exiting the twelve-unit apartment building. The officers felt that upon his exit and approach towards patrol car, and eye contact with one of the officers, he turned and proceeded into a side alley. Officers then pursued respondent feeling his suspicious and evasive behavior was probable of being criminal in nature. They pulled their car into the alley and immediately stopped and searched the defendants outer clothing finding no weapons. During the cursory search one officer testified that he had felt a cellophane bag containing crack cocaine later when weighed a total of 1/5th of a gram was found. The officers claimed it within their scope to search and seize what the officer suspected to be drugs inside the defendants clothing.…
A person was wanted for questioning about a recent bombing; this person was hiding in a two-family dwelling. Mapp, the owner on the top floor, refused to let the officers come in without a search warrant. After Mapp refused to immediately let the officers in they broke the door’s glass open and then unlocked and opened the door from the outside. Mapp’s attorney showed up, but the officers wouldn’t let him see his client or go inside the house. Mapp demanded the search warrant. The officer help up a paper claiming to be the warrant and Mapp put the apper in her bosom. Then the officer struggled to retrieve the paper, which he eventually recovered. Mapp was handcuffed for resisting the officer. The officer searched the entire house but all that was recovered was “lwed and lascivious book and pictures”. She was then convicted for having them in her possession.…
INTRODUCTION OF THE ISSUES: Police officers were called to Mr. Smith’s residency regarding a noise violation on February 4th, 2007. Officers observed the occupants, including Mr. Jonathon Blake, through the large front window of the dwelling engaged in activity that appeared to the officers as smoking marijuana. They also witnessed Mr. Blake hand over a small plastic baggie filled with suspected cocaine to another occupant. The officers were granted access to the home by Mr. Smith and noticed what appeared to be a shotgun between the couch cushions. Further inspection of the residence revealed three additional guns. Mr. Blake had a large amount of suspected marijuana and cocaine and $400 on his person. Mr. Blake is being charged with Possession of a Controlled Substance, Distribution of a Controlled Substance, and Possession of an Unregistered Firearm. It is in my professional opinion that the seized drugs are admissible to the court as evidence but the guns however, are not.…
In this case, the police were informed the petitioner Rochin was selling drugs, and therefore they forced their way into his house and asked about the drugs. Rochin swallowed several drug capsules in order to dispose of narcotic evidence and the police beat him repeatedly and jumped on his stomach to make him throw up the ingested evidence. Thereafter the police transported Rochin to a hospital where they instructed a medical expert to administer an emetic to Rochin in order to induce vomiting so that the contents of his stomach could be revealed. Eventually the suspect vomited the capsules and the police used these as the evidence to convict him on drug possession charges.…
This case revolves around a house built on a 76-acre parcel of real estate by Thomas and Teresa Cline in Augusta County, Virginia next Roy Berg’s home. Even though the two homes were about 1,800 feet apart from each other they still remained in view of each other. Both parties had several disagreements which lead Berg to equip an 11-foot tripod with motion sensors and floodlights that would intermittently illuminate the Cline’s home. Surveillance cameras, that transmitted on an open frequency which could be received by any television within range, tracking some of the movement on the Cline’s property was also installed by Berg. The Cline’s requested for Berg to turn off or redirect the lights. Upon…
W.M.’s unusual relationship with Mr. Larson prompted Officer Nelson to engage in an extensive and thorough investigation to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty regarding W.M.’s authority to consent to the search of the apartment. “[W]here an officer is presented with ambiguous facts related to authority, he or she has a duty to investigate further before relying on the consent.” United States v. Kimoana, 383 F.3d 1215, 1222 (10th Cir. 2004). Even when consent is accompanied by an explicit assertion of residency, if the surrounding circumstances cause a reasonable person to doubt the party’s authority, the officer must proceed with further inquiry. United States v. Rosario, 962 F.2d 733, 738 (7th Cir. 1992).…
When using laser evidence, the prosecution is required to prove that the use of laser is not an illegal speed trap. If the prosecution did not provide proof (a certified copy of the speed survey) to establish as part of its case, that Bogus is not an illegal Speed Trap, the evidence would be inadmissible. The defendant also requested a fine reduction and a Court assignment to…
After informing the subject I proceeded up front to Inform Officer I. Ortiz of my findings. Once Officer Ortiz was informed of my findings I proceeded back to the AP office where I continued to watch one the females via CCTV. While watching the female subject I took notice of the fact that the merchandise was still present on the top the subject's shopping carriage. I also observed Officer Ortiz proceeding towards the restroom area, which one of the female subjects were still inside of the restroom. As Officer Ortiz was walking towards the restroom the female subject was seen exiting the restroom area where she met up with the other female subject. Both of the subjects were then seen walking towards the front of the store where they both being to remove the HBC items along with two jars of honey and package of lighters from the top of their shopping carriage, which they placed on one of the end caps. The subjects then proceeded to register three where they made a purchase on a package of paper plates and then proceeded to exit the store via the produce side. Total Amount Recovered…
First, by plain view, in which Officer Jones should have witnessed a crime occurring in his personal local housing project from a public area. Second, the officer should have an affidavit, warrant, or summons to conduct a search and seizure of local housing project. Finally, the officer should have a reason of suspicion supported by facts for his actions in trespassing. Without probable cause, this case in court under Judicial System would be dismissed without accepting evidence of drugs. The court will also rule that insufficient evidence present against the citizen and case would be dismissed without the right to…
Ptl. Rivera and I conducted a search of the vehicle and located a nearly empty bottle of UV vodka in the rear compartment of the vehicle. All three subjects submitted to a portable breath test and all three results yielded a BAC of .00. Martin stated that he shares the vehicle with his older cousin who is of age. The vodka was poured out and disposed of. Ptl. Rivera further located a Gillespie Lieutenant badge in the glove compartment of the vehicle. Martin stated that his grandfather is a retired police officer from Gillespie. I advised Martin that the badge would be seized and that his grandfather would have to come to the Bethalto Police Department and speak with me to have the badge returned to him. I continued to scold the three for having alcohol in the vehicle and to be trespassing on a road where there is a visible “No Trespassing” sign in the road. I told Martin to take Marrujo and Metcalf home immediately. I told Marrujo and Metcalf to tell their…
One of the hardest decisions that judges have to make is sentencing a juvenile to be tried as an adult. With the increase in violent crimes in America today, juveniles are often found in the front line of media for violent crimes. Within society as a whole, those who are under the age of 18 years old do not function as adults, which is why the law protects children from the consequences of their actions. With the harshness and severity of crimes committed by juveniles…
Upon making contact with the driver (Rivas, Thomas DOB 05/08/96), there was a strong odor of cannabis emanation from inside the vehicle. The vehicle was occupied by five (5) passengers. I requested Thomas to exit the vehicle, at which time he complied. I could detect a strong odor of cannabis emanating from Thomas' jacket. I recovered two (2) small roaches "remains of a cannabis rolled in cigar paper" from his left jacket pocket. All the occupants were requested to exit the vehicle. The female occupants (Ramirez, Susana DOB 02/21/97 and Correa Cervantes, Arantxa G. DOB 09/10/97) were searched by Ofc. S. Brown #287 on the scene.…