The crime of the death of Lindbergh’s baby.
2. What evidence did investigators have about the crime in the 1930s?
A sketch of the kidnapper, where the baby was, and a ladder.
3. What evidence did investigators use to find a suspect? What was found at Hauptmann's home that linked to the crime?
Hair, witnesses, suspects. A baby blanket.
4. What information does the ladder give forensic scientists?
That there would need to be two or more people to steady the ladder for someone to get in the room.
5. Why is it believed that Hauptmann had accomplices in the crime?
It would take more than one person to do the job.
6. What evidence exists to cast suspicion on John Knoll? What evidence exists to suggest that he wasn't involved?
The fact that he was awake and called for help moments after the baby was kidnapped. He was in the kitchen when it happened.
7. What evidence exists to suggest that Charles Lindbergh himself was involved in the kidnapping and death of his son? Do you agree or disagree with this theory? Why?
The baby would cry or scream if someone they didn’t know, it would be easier if the kidnappers had someone on the inside pulling strings to get the baby to them.
8. Based on the evidence presented in the video, what do you think happened? What evidence supports your theory?
I think that Hauptmann had people working with him inside and out of the house. The way that they seemed to get the baby out of the house almost silently is suspicious, unless there was someone(s) on the inside.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Charles and Anne Lindbergh's son was abducted from their home on March 1, 1932 in New Jersey. The only evidence left in their infant son's room were muddy footprints, a ransom note, a chisel found a short distance from the house, and a homemade ladder. Even though the ransom was paid, the body of the infant was found two months later half buried in the woods. No other evidence was found, so there was no substantial evidence pointing to any possible suspect.…
- 385 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Please list the evidence submitted for each task. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found or describe the nature of the evidence (e.g. video, illustration).…
- 5689 Words
- 20 Pages
Powerful Essays -
3. List whether each of the following substances was positive or negative for starch, as indicated by using iodine. (7 points)…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
On March 1st 1932, 20-month-old Charles Lindbergh III was kidnapped. He was the con of the internationally known pilot, Charles Lindbergh. Lindbergh and his wife Ana discovered the ransom note in their son’s room. The note demanded $50,000 for the return of the child. The kidnapper was very clever, using a ladder to sneak up to the child’s room and snatch him. He had left clues, however they were all false. Everyone wanted to help find the missing baby, even though locked up, Al Capone had offered his help. A few days later, another note showed up; this time demanding $70,000. This time the kidnapper seemed serious, giving a time and place to drop off the money. They told the Lindbergh’s that their child was on a boat called the Nelly off the coast of Massachusetts, but after long hours of searching nothing was found, no boat and no child. Shortly after, baby Charles Lindbergh III’s body was found not far from the Lindbergh’s mansion. The family was so heartbroken that they moved away after donating their mansion to charity. “The kidnapping looked like it would go unsolved until September 1934, when a marked bill from the ransom turned up. The gas station attendant who had accepted the bill wrote down the license plate number because he was suspicious of the driver. It was tracked back to a German immigrant and carpenter, Bruno Hauptmann.” When the detectives searched Hauptmann house, they found a large portion Lindbergh’s ransom money. He tried denying it but there was plenty of evidence proving he was the kidnapper. Besides the money, the handwriting on the ransom not seemed to closely resemble Hauptmann’s. Although the prosecution’s case was weak, there was still enough evidence to convict Hauptmann. He was then electrocuted the following year. “In the aftermath of the crime--the most notorious of the 1930s--kidnapping was made a federal…
- 318 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
5. Wireless allows connections to computers in areas where wires cannot reach or would be expensive to install.…
- 306 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Lindbergh kidnapping was the “crime of the century” in the 1930’s. Charles Lindbergh became famous for making the first solo transatlantic airplane flight in 1927, later he became a daredevil pilot performing at fairs and other events. Before all of Charlie's’ amazing accomplishments, he was a farmer in Minnesota. Charles and his wife Anne Lindbergh lived in their new mansion in Hopewell, New Jersey, they had a nanny named Betty Gow, who was the first to discover the missing infant from the second floor. Because Charles Lindbergh was so well loved by Americans, the kidnapping of his son was a shocking event in our own nation.…
- 162 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
(B) Make a list of the evidence that suggests that Oswald was being setup as a patsy.…
- 2075 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
The evening his son was abducted, Charles Lindbergh missed an appointment and stayed home. The same evening, Lindbergh had scheduled a speaking engagement in New York. He usually went to the appointments on time, but this time he came back from work in New York City and didn’t go to the dinner to speak. Lindbergh said that he “forgot the commitment”. However, he could have stayed home to conduct the kidnapping from inside the house. The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping: Background Information states, “About 15 minutes before Charles Lindbergh arrived home, Anne thought she had heard a car in the gravel driveway. She looked but didn’t see anything, and the dog had not barked.” When the police asked Charles Lindbergh why his dog didn’t bark, Lindbergh said his dog wouldn’t hear someone who was being quiet. But, the dog might not have barked because it knew the person. If Charles Lindbergh missed the meeting to conduct the kidnapping, the dog would recognize its owner and would not bark. On the contrary, he could have stayed home because he was not feeling well. A key point is that he could have stayed home any other day, but he was home the day his son was seized and murdered. Coincidence? Some think not. Where some see coincidence, others see a conspiracy. In addition, the Lindbergh family usually spent their weekdays at their house in Englewood, but since little Charlie had a cold they decided to stay in their Hopewell house. Only a few people knew they were in their Hopewell house that Tuesday: Charles Lindbergh, Anne Morrow Lindbergh, and the maids. One of the maids, Violet Sharpe, had killed herself when the police questioned her about the kidnapping. Many say that she was guilty of accidentally giving out information about where the family was staying, but others say that Charles Lindbergh was blackmailing her for something else. Unlike the rest of the household, Lindbergh knew one important detail.…
- 1904 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Parents have a hard time trying to keep their children safe. When children get kidnapped, parents, parents have to try to try their hardest to save them. Such was the case of the Lindbergh family. It was a regular day on March 1st, 1932. Mr. Lindbergh was going to work and Mrs. Lindbergh was going to stay home with the baby. She went upstairs to check on the baby. He was not there. Mrs. Lindbergh then found a ransom note. All of a sudden the world crashed down on her. Her baby was kidnapped.…
- 477 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
crime at hand just from an analysis of the crime scene. One major detail that is…
- 553 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
4. Do you think more tests should have been done on Monet's corpse? Justify your response.…
- 1216 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Mr. Brian, Kaelin aka Kato who was a guest at the defendant guesthouse was key for the prosecution to establish prima facie. Mr. Kaelin established the time that they him and the defendant went to dinner at around 9:18 pm then returned to the residence at 9:40 pm where he and the defendant went to the separate living areas. After which he has made some phone call verified by the phone company record for date and time. Mr. Kaelin did not did not see the defendant until he went to investigate the thumps on the wall around 10:45 pm were he had seen the limousine outside the gate and assumed would be buzzed in be the defendant. The testimony of Mr. Kaelin along with the testimony of the limousine driver seeing a dark, shadowy figure going into the house gave the prosecution the ways to explanation of event thought out the night to establish who was responsible for the murders. This was important to set the timeline for which the prosecution could dwindle down the hours of the murders with more details.…
- 1038 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the 1950s, Harry Hess interpreted this paleomagnetic data of newly formed oceanic crust. He proposed that while new oceanic crust was being formed at the summit of the oceanic ridges, the adjacent oceanic crust was moving laterally away from the ridge. What is this process called?…
- 936 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
5. Tests for hair and fibers, glass, soil, paint, and similar materials and equipment necessary to conduct these tests.…
- 456 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2. The narrator wanted to show that he is not insane, and offered a story as proof.…
- 421 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays