While Claudius is convincing Laertes to kill Hamlet, he does so by appealing to Laertes’s ego, telling him about how his rapier is “most especial” and that it would be a “sight indeed If one could match you.” (Shakespeare 1176) By playing off of Laertes’s pride in his swordsmanship, Laertes is lured into trying to kill Hamlet. Another time Laertes is seen with hubris is when he is assaulting Claudius about avenging his father saying that he will “husband [his means] so well They shall go far with little.” (Shakespeare 1171) Laertes believes he can singlehandedly kill the king for his own will. Overall, Hamlet meets a few of these requirements, but falls short on a few, namely anagnorisis and hubris, never recognizing it was his own fault for dying, and having so little pride that he could never act on anything. Laertes fits the definition of a tragic hero far better than Hamlet, by meeting all of the requirements Aristotle set in his original definition, hamartia, peripeteia, anagnorisis, and
While Claudius is convincing Laertes to kill Hamlet, he does so by appealing to Laertes’s ego, telling him about how his rapier is “most especial” and that it would be a “sight indeed If one could match you.” (Shakespeare 1176) By playing off of Laertes’s pride in his swordsmanship, Laertes is lured into trying to kill Hamlet. Another time Laertes is seen with hubris is when he is assaulting Claudius about avenging his father saying that he will “husband [his means] so well They shall go far with little.” (Shakespeare 1171) Laertes believes he can singlehandedly kill the king for his own will. Overall, Hamlet meets a few of these requirements, but falls short on a few, namely anagnorisis and hubris, never recognizing it was his own fault for dying, and having so little pride that he could never act on anything. Laertes fits the definition of a tragic hero far better than Hamlet, by meeting all of the requirements Aristotle set in his original definition, hamartia, peripeteia, anagnorisis, and