Preview

Lafler V. Cooper: Argumentative Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
519 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lafler V. Cooper: Argumentative Essay
Trials and verdicts NyKeisha Frye
Strayer University CRJ100 Professor Janice Bella March, 1, 2015

In 2011 Lafler V. Cooper was a case where Cooper was being charged with assault with intent to murder and three other offenses for shooting a woman in the thigh and buttocks after missing a shot in her head. In criminal court they offered to dismiss two of the charges and to recommend a 51-85 month sentence on the other two in exchange for a guilty plea. After entering the guilty plea, he then rejected the offer after his lawyer told him that the prosecution would be unable to establish intent to murder because the victim had been shot below the waist. Criminal
…show more content…

He did take it to trial and sadly the verdict was that he was found guilty and was given a life sentence without the chance of parole. Another police officer took over the case and looked farther into the investigation. He learned March, 18, 2012 that the murder case against him would be dismissed. It goes to show you that the law Enforcement made a mistake, and they needed to look more into the suspects when interviewing them, get hard evidence, and possibly DNA. Even though that man wasn’t guilty he was still accused and charged. I’m sure when he goes places or tries to get a job people think twice that kind of slandered his name. The third case is a hall of famer, former NFL player who was a teammate for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Oakland Raiders. He was arrested for physically abusing a woman he was dating at the time. He allegedly assaulted her in a hotel room they were staying at. There were no witnesses to this woman’s accusations. Due to this incident he was actually pulled from covering the 2010 Super bowl XLIV. The woman ended up dropping all the charges. Another case that I was reading about is the Haleigh Cummings story. In this case

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A recent criminal Supreme Court case that I find to be interesting is Missouri v. Frye. Actus reus is a guilty act, mens rea is a guilty mind, and concurrence is the equality of rights. Both actus reus and mens rea are both needed in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability. This case was about a guy named Frye, he was arrested for driving with a revoked license. Frye was previously arrested a few times before this incident dealing with the same crime. Missouri state law can give you a maximum sentence of up to four years when arrested three times for driving on a revoked license. The prosecutor sent Frye's counsel a letter that offered two possible plea bargains. If he was to plea guilty the charge could be reduced to a misdemeanor…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How did the Three Branches of government respond to the social issues of freedom of religion based on Wallace v. Jaffree case?…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    R. V. Latimer Case Study

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The reason I chose this case was due to the fact it was a popular case throughout my childhood and because my cousin was a quadriplegic and had a form of cerebral palsy where she was limited to being taken care of by medical and hospital staff I was just a small child at this time my family would have regular visits with her One summer she got extremely sick and went into a coma my aunt then had to make the decision to keep her on life support or to let her go So this case is very relevant to what happened but under different conditions and circumstances.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Villette V.

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Finally, on July 27, 2000, Marie Villette (plaintiff) had a carport installed from Sheldorado Aluminum Product (defendant). The covering would collapse six months later on top of the plaintiffs Mercedes Benz. All the plaintiff is requesting is the $3,000 she has spent on the carport. Ms. Villette filed a lawsuit opposing Sheldorado expecting…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon announcement of this year's National History Day theme: Rights and Responsibilities in History, our group toyed with several topics. Skimming through rights in history, a thought about the mentally ill people, led us to selecting the Rights of the Mentally Retarded. When focusing on research, we came to the realization that the topic was indeed to braud. Our topic was then narrowed down to, The Right of the 8th Amendment for the Mentally Retarded in Prison. We then discovered court cases over the rights of the mentally retarded in prison, and decided that the case that appealed the most was Penry v Lynaugh. Resulting our topic to be: The Right of the 8th Amendment for the Mentally Retarded in Prison: Penry v Lynaugh.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2000, Ray Lewis was faced with charges for the murders of two young men, He managed to escape the case without any real charges due to making a deal by testifying against his companions. I believe that regardless of his football fame he should have been charged with the crime because he never received real punishment from the legal system, there was evidence that pointed towards him being the killer, the families never got justice for the murders, and there was evidence that pointed towards him being the killer.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a Frontline Program- The Plea we watched in class there were interviews of people involved in three separate cases that had involved the plea bargain. In this video a man named Charles Gampero had gotten into a fight outside of a bowling alley and walked away leaving the victim unharmed and alive. After he had left the victim had been killed, but Gampero had been charged with second degree murder and attempt to kill. The prosecutors had told Gampero that they would give him a plea of dropping the charges to manslaughter, giving him 7-21 years and that if he didn’t he would get a mandatory 25 to life. Gampero said because he was positive that he was not at fault and had left the victim unharmed he had wanted to take it to trial. In the end Gampero wound up taking the plea and not taking it to trial because the judge had scared him so much by telling him that he would get no less than 25 years if he took it to trial. If Gampero had went to trial he would have had the chance of getting less time than his 7-21 years. The judges are allowed to lie to you like they had to Gampero about getting 25 to life. Another example from this video was Patsy Kelly Jarrett. Jarrett was charged for the murder of a gas station tenant years after the murder. Jarrett was home during the time of the murder and the only evidence was someone saying that it was her. The prosecutors had given her a plea bargain of taking robbery and getting five years and later…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furman v. Georgia

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Furman v. Georgia case, the resident awoke in the middle of the night to find William Henry Furman committing robbery in his house. When Furman attempted to escape the home he dropped his gun. Upon hitting the ground, the gun discharged and killed the homeowner. The death was a freak accident that resulted in murder. At trial, in an unsworn statement, Furman said that while trying to escape, he tripped and the gun he was carrying fired accidentally, killing the victim. This contradicted his prior statement to police that he had turned and blindly fired a shot while fleeing. Either way, because the shooting occurred during the commission of a felony, Furman was still guilty of murder and eligible for the death penalty under the law at the time. He was tried and found guilty based largely on his own statement. He was sentenced to death, but the punishment was never carried out.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Seventy-three percent of those who killed a black person faced no penalty compared to 59 percent of those who killed a white.”2 . The juries on these cases should learn what the law actually means. In Jacksonville, FL, Marissa Alexander was sentenced to 20 years in jail simply for firing a warning shot in to the ceiling of her house. Alexander, who had never been arrested before, has said she fired a bullet at a wall in 2010 to scare off her husband when she felt he was threatening her. No one was hurt, but the judge in the case said he was bound by state law to sentence her to 20 years in prison after she was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Alexander had rejected a plea deal that would have resulted in a three-year prison sentence and chose to go to trial. A jury deliberated 12 minutes before convicting her. After she tried to use the stand your…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    False Confessions

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1988, Ted White was clubbed in the head and face at his mattress business between 12:45 and 1:55 p.m. White died of his injuries three days later and was never able to tell the police officers of the incident. There were no witnesses found and the police never discovered any fingerprints or DNA to help identify the actual perpetrator. Regardless, police originally suspected Matt Mason of the murder but were unable to bring a case against him. Mason and Tinney were acquaintances. Glenn Tinney original pled guilty to the murder of ted white in 1992. There was evidence that was presented at court that got Tinney sentence exonerated. The evidence they had to get his sentence exonerated was the fact that none of the confessions matched the facts of the crime and an Ohio judge reversed Tinney’s conviction. The prosecutor investigator was told Glenn Tinney may know something about Mason’s participation in ted white’s murder, Tinney said that him and mason killed Ted white together but then a couple of days later he said he did the crimes alone. The police also uncovered that Glenn Tinney gave other statements that was not consistent with each other or with the facts of the crime. The court concluded that upon close comparison of Tinney’s confessions, he “confessed to killing a man he could not identify, for conflicting motives which don’t match the facts, at the wrong time of day, with a weapon that does not match the victim’s injuries, by striking him in the wrong part of the head, and stealing items the victim either still possessed after the attach or probably never possessed.” Because of these reasons, the court said it would be “manifestly unjust to deny withdraw of the guilty plea” because the confessions did not provide any support for the murder conviction (McGinn, 2013 ).…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I definitely believe that this topic is controversial; however, I actually think that it depends on the specific law. For example, something such as a drinking age law is put in place for a good reason. There has been research proven in the developmental psychology field and even in the biopsychology field that our prefrontal cortex does not fully mature until our early twenties. Our prefrontal cortex is responsible for our executive decision making, planning, and other complex cognitive behavior. I think laws like this should be followed for that specific reason. Obviously if our brain is not fully developed to make good decisions when we are sober, it is definitely not ready to make executive decisions while one is intoxicated. Also,…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    burns to 85% of his body and died on 2 August 2010 of multiple organ failures…

    • 15030 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays