Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.
Basic Information
Title of landmark case(including case number): Tinker vs. Des Moines case no.21
Plaintiff: The Des Moines School System
Defendant: Argued November 12, 1968
Date case argued and decided: Decided February 24, 1969
Judgment Affirmed or Reversed: Eighth Circuit reversed
Case Evaluation
Write three to five complete sentences to respond to each of the following items. Issue/charges being discussed: John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhar who were each suspended from their schools for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam. Circuit Courts and the Court of Appeals in the state of Iowa both ruled that black armbands, which represented bad feelings towards the Vietnam War, was inappropriate attire for school. Because of this ruling and because the kids were each suspended from school, they appealed and brought their matter to a higher court. Ultimately, the Tinker v. Des Moines case reached the highest court in the United States , the Supreme Court.
Evidence presented during the arguments: Tinkers and Christopher Eckhart filed the following charges against the state of Iowa: The Tinkers stated that their suspension resulted out of legal expressions. They believed they were suspended for simply stating their opinions on the war. They believed this action taken by the school and the stated was a direct violation of their 1st and 14th Amendment rights, which protected free speech and free expression.
Conclusions of the judge/judges: The United States Supreme Court in Tinker v. Des Moines ruled in favor of the Tinkers and Christopher Eckhart, claiming that the protest undertaken by the students did not intend to spark violence, destruction, damage or criminal activity. Because their protest was peaceful in nature, their expressions and speech were protected by the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution. The students were thus allowed to wear their black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War. Connection with amendment/personal freedom topic for your informative/explanatory article: This case is a connection to the first amendment and personal freedom because these kids had the right to wear and express how the felt and they should’ve not been punished because of that. Its their personal freedom to express and say what they feel its their freedom of speech they can do it as long as they aren’t causing any real physical damage to others.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Tinker v. Des Moines is a court case that happened in 1969 and was a dispute about wearing armbands to school for a protest against the Vietnam war. The principals did not like the idea of the protest and decided to shut it down by banning all armbands. The students weren't going to go down without a fight and wore them anyway.…
- 329 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Maddox declared that his rights to due process were violated as it is stated in the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland. This violation is proven by the state failing to disclose a photograph taken by the police of Elder’s bed neatly made shortly after the alleged rape. The police found no blood, semen, or fluids of other kinds on the bedspread during an examination, no rape kit was used either, and proof of a letter was found that Debbie Phillips had left the insurance Maddox belonged to for financial reasons by way of a written statement from a witness by the name of Brenda Phelps. Maddox had appealed the denial of habeas relief.…
- 762 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Content: Student located three different secondary sources on given legal issue. Student provided proper citation for each source. Student provided a summary of each secondary source and explained why the source was helpful. This section of the grading rubric counts up to 30 points.…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Petitioners, three public school pupils, in Des Moines, Iowa were suspended from school for violating a school board (respondents) policy of banning the wearing of armbands. The armbands represented the protest of Government policy in Vietnam. The District Court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Eight Circuit Court was equally divided, therefore affirmed the decision of the District Court. Writ of certiorari was granted and reversed and remanded the decision of the Eight Circuit Court.…
- 307 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In order to answer the questions you will need to READ THE CASE, STUDY THE COURSE MATERIAL, SEARCH ADDITIONAL SECONDARY INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.…
- 460 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Although students do not lose their rights as they walk through the school gates, their rights are restricted for the safety of others. The court case of Tinker v. Des Moines argues the same issue of the rights of students while on school grounds. “Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students” (OYEZ). As the armbands distracted students, the inappropriate photos of Suzie distracted upperclassmen from their educational work, which also put Suzie in an uncomfortable position depriving herself the ability to focus 100% on school work. Therefore, the principal was taking away a distraction to discipline the students which can be compared to the case of Tinker v. Des…
- 807 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
That the students in the Tinker case were protesting and in the Hazelwood case they believed that their rights got taken away.…
- 709 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Tinker v. Des Moines, New Jersey v. T.L.O., and Ingraham v. Wright are just three Supreme Court cases about student rights. The first one, the Tinker v. Des Moines is a case that took place in 1965. The issue of this case was the freedom of speech in school. It all started on one day when John and Mary Beth Tinker along with their friend Chris Eckhardt chose to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. School officials told them to take off the bands, but they refused. In effect they were suspended from their high school in Des Moines, Iowa. All their parents sued the school district, because they claimed it was a violation of the First amendment, the right of freedom of speech. The significance of this case is having a right to express yourself. The court limited the right of self expression. They limited the right by not giving students unlimited self expression. Another way they limited it was by explaining that if the act of…
- 639 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It was simple to me. The school newspaper is about representing the whole school, not individual students themselves. Both sides could agree that the students were presenting their own views, but then this is where the sides start to split. The minority believed that since the students were expressing their own views, that the Tinker standard should apply. But, this was not applied because the students are not suppose to use the school newspaper as a public forum for discussion. The school newspaper is suppose to represent the whole school, and not just those writers. Therefore, the principal was doing nothing wrong by restricting the student’s rights when he censored and prevented the release of the articles in the…
- 1304 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Read the following scenarios. Answer, in a 50- to 100-word response, each of the following questions:…
- 1952 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
On December 16th, 1965, in Des Moines, Iowa, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt wore black armbands to the local high school and middle school to protest US involvement in the Vietnam War. On the following day, John Frederick Tinker wore a black armband to school for the same reason (Lusted. 15). Mary was thirteen and in middle school while christopher and john were in high school (Brannen). On both days the students wearing armbands who refused to remove them, were suspended until they returned without the armbands (Brannen). This case is called Tinker vs. Des Moines because while Christopher Eckhardt was involved there were two tinkers and only one eckhardt, tinker was also easier to pronounce (Johnson. 9). In the years after the trial…
- 1024 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
n/a. (2007, June 25). Aclu slams supreme court decision in student free speech case . Retrieved from…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
armbands was a silent form of expression and that students do not have to give…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Tinker's didn't do anything to effectively mess with the learning in the school, so they didn't stop the school from doing their job, and they were able to maintain their rights. In the Fraser case, Fraser openly made sexual jokes in front of the whole school, as their representative. He did so in a way that was hard for the school to justify that what he did was too inappropriate for the school. His goal was to be funny, without real justification for what he was doing. The Supreme Court decided that what he did, did prevent the school from doing their job. Therefor he had his free speech largely effected in school, while common good was thought to be improved with this decision. Fraser in order to prevent anything like his situation again they made it obvious that free speech in school can be restrained in order to keep the learning environment. In the Tinker case the judges left the case open for discipline on students who "interfere with the work of the school or impinge upon the rights of other students." Which means that they narrowed the spectrum onto where the schools can interfere with individual rights, and where they can't. In the Fraser case, these same principals are applied, saying "The First Amendment does not prevent the school officials from determining that to permit a vulgar and lewd speech, such as respondents would undermine the school's basic educational mission." Fraser's speech was thought…
- 898 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays