Preview

Landmark Trademark Case Judgement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12526 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Landmark Trademark Case Judgement
Bottom of Form
Bombay High Court
First Appeal No.1076/20 vs Aged 26 Years, Occ. : Business on 6 March, 2012
Bench: A. B. Chaudhari
1 fa1076.11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
FIRST APPEAL NO.1076/2011
APPELLANT :- Dhiraj Dharamdas Dewani, Aged 26 years, Occ. : Business,
Proprietor M/s Dewani Soft Inc. Office situated at 303, 3rd Floor, Panjwani
Market, Teen Nal Chowk, Itwari, Nagpur.
...VERSUS...
RESPONDENTS:- 1. M/s Sonal Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. through its Directors.
1a) Suresh Mansukhlal Bothra, aged adult, Occupation Business,
Director Sonal Info Systems
Private Limited.
1b) Usha Suresh Bothra, Aged adult,
Occupation business, Director
Sonal Info Systems Private Limited.
1c) Jatanbai Mansukhlal Bothra,
Aged adult, Occupation business,
Director Sonal Info Systems
Private Limited.
Directors (1a to 1c) c/o Office at G-1, Ganga Apartment, Gharpure
Ghat, Ashok Stambh, Nasik-422002.
Nos. 1a to 1c R/o Ridhi Siddhi
Apartment, Indankat, Panchavati,
Nasik 422131.
----------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri U.N. Vyas, Adv. for appellant]
[Shri K.V. Deshmukh, Adv. for respdt. nos.1 (a) to (c)] ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.
Date of reserving the judgment : 27.01.2012 Date of pronouncing the judgment : 06.03.2012 2 fa1076.11.odt
J U D G M E N T
1. Heard. Admit. Taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the rival parties.
2. This appeal was taken up for final disposal with the consent of the Counsel for the rival parties in view of the fact that application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the respondent/defendant was allowed and consequently, the appellant contended that he stands without any remedy.
FACTS
3. The appellant is the original plaintiff, who filed Special Civil Suit No.3/2010 in the Court of District Judge 5, Nagpur under Section 60 of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Landmark case law

    • 1824 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S. 261 (1990) was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990. In a 5-4 court decision, the court found in favor of the Missouri Dept. of Health. The court affirmed the ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri. However, it upheld the legal standard that competent persons are able to exercise the right to refuse medical treatment under the Due Process Clause and its implied right to privacy. Because there was no “clear and convincing evidence” of what Nancy Cruzan wanted, the court upheld the state’s policy.…

    • 1824 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divorce Case Summary

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. This Notice of Appeal is brought by NDEM BURABARI ODUU, (“Respondent”), pro-SE, who now submits his Appeal or De-Novo request and would show the following:…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. From the decrees of the district court, three judges, granting the relief prayed, the case comes here on appeal.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because I now conclude that the agreement to arbitrate was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable, Bally 's motion to dismiss the Complaint and to compel arbitration…

    • 3978 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Landmark Court Case

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    the laws of the country. Many factors determine the outcome of these cases such as the…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statement of Jurisdiction

    • 6557 Words
    • 27 Pages

    R. App. P. 4. The district court entered the order from which appeal No. 0315420 was taken on February 12, 2003. JSL timely filed a Supplemental…

    • 6557 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Common Law Method

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Applicant and co-accused are facing Special Case No. 124/2002 in the Court of Special Judge (Dacoity) Gwalior for offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, Section 25/27 of Arms Act and Section 11/13 of MPDVPK Act.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    • Powers of Court hearing originating summons or notice of application – O 17 r 5…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Review of Wing's of Fire

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Asst. Prof Asst. Prof Prof &Head Asst. Prof Asst. Prof Asst. Prof Asst. Prof Asst. Prof Asst. Prof Asst. Prof Asst. Prof…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case pertains to Claim for refund of service tax paid by the Assessee who found that he was not accountable to pay tax in light of Circular No. 80/10/2004, dated 17-9-2004 since it constructed civil structures which…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, petitioner Producer’s Bank of the Philippines (“petitioner” for brevity) assails the September 19, 1996 Resolutioni[1] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 50016 which dismissed petitioner’s appeal for being filed out of time. The Court of Appeals decreed thus:…

    • 4711 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    7. On May 13, 2010, as per Verification and Report from the Judicial Records Division…

    • 2316 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keerthanalu

    • 70184 Words
    • 281 Pages

    CC No. 1024 ISBN: 81-88018-10-4 Price: Rs. 175 Published by V.S. Ramanan President Sri Ramanasramam Tiruvannamalai 606 603 Tamil Nadu INDIA Email: ashram@ramana-maharshi.org Website: www.ramana-maharshi.org T ypeset at Sri Ramanasramam Printed by Sri Venkatesa Printing House Chennai 600 026 email: saiprints@saimail.com P UBLISHER’S NOTE…

    • 70184 Words
    • 281 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    globalization

    • 870 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This caselet was written by Mylavarapu Vinaya Kumar, under the direction of D.G. Prasad, ICFAI…

    • 870 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays