Preview

Law 310 Week 6 Case Studt

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law 310 Week 6 Case Studt
What problems do you think Dr. Patel might see with the fact that you have taken the property under a quitclaim deed?
A quitclaim deed gives no covenant of title. A quitclaim deed says: “I am conveying to you any interest I have in this property. I don’t know what other interests there may be.” This means that you may be taking on burdens of the past, such as a mortgage, attachment, judgment lien, or any other interest in real property un-knowingly. Therefore, if I default on the loan taken from Dr. Patel and he take’s ownership of the land and attempts sell it to get his money back, the land may not be worth what was lent because the property may have past interests.
What would be the difference if Grandma had given you a warranty deed?
When granting a warranty deed "The grantor covenants with the grantee that he is lawfully seized in fee simple of the granted premises; that the same are free from all encumbrances except as therein set forth, that he has good right, full power and lawful authority to sell and convey the same to the grantee and that the grantor shall, and his heirs, executors and administrators shall, warrant and defend the same to the grantee and his heirs and assigns forever against the claims and demands of all persons except as therein set forth." Having a warranty deed would ensure to myself as well as Mr. Patel what the exact, if any interests the family farm holds. You will know what the property is worth and Mr. Patel would be reassured that the property is worth the investment. This would be a fee simple and Mr. Patel and I would know there where no conditions of owning the property, we could do with it what we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gagnon V Coombs Summary

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Simultaneously, both, Mr. Gagnon and his daughter Joan were not aware of each other’s actions up until Mr. Gagnon signed the contract to sell the farm. However, Joan being an agent while POA was active, had an obligation to inform Mr. Gagnon of any material changes. Conveying the Shelburne farm to her trust was definitely a material transfer and by failing to notify her father, she violated her duty of loyalty. That is a breach number one and secondly, Joan needed to realize that her authority to arrange for the Shelburne property had been revoked when she found out that Mr. Gagnon had a contract to sell it. Therefore, Mr. Francis, should be official owner of the Shelburne, who would have rights to void transaction created by Joan Coombs and recovery the property to…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief 11.2

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lester Cooper and Julie Smith were engaged, Lester gave various gifts to both Julie & Janet Smith while living in Janet’s house. Later they had a disagreement causing the engagement to break off and Cooper desired his gifts given back. Julie gave back only the engagement ring. Cooper subsequently sued the Smith’s.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 310

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Laffey v. Northwest Airlines 567 F.2d 429 (U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 1976)…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Fails as Lawyers Declare the Legal Profession is Not for Sale! The Berkeley Electronic Press. Retrieved on May 19, 2013, from:http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1263&context=elders…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The results from the surveys conducted concluded that the food at Lucky Cheng’s rated a 9 and in the category of décor and service a 15; scores could range from 0-30. Keeping in mind the results came directly from consumers…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Widget Tech Inc. is in need of update the company’s current code of ethics due to growth of the company and the changing workforce. Research has been conducted to revise the current policy and address topics that were previously overlooked. Widget Tech Inc. is a company that stresses both corporate and personal integrity. We not only comply with laws and applicable regulations; but we also strive to conduct our affairs according to the highest ethical standards. Employees are expected to be honest and forthright in dealings with managers, subordinates and with one another, as well as with clients, suppliers, government agencies and their employees, business partners and the general public. Widget Tech employees must maintain the highest level of personal integrity and encourage it in others; they must not lie, cheat, steal or do anything that would bring dishonor upon themselves or the company (SRA International, Inc. 2009).…

    • 1178 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I corrected your cover page – all I had to do was center the five lines on the cover page and delete some spacing between the lines. Citations are not correct, spacing is a problem, basic keyboarding problems with a space before a period at the end of a sentence and a space before a comma within a sentence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    (b) No title shall be vested by virtue of such adverse possession, unless such conveyance, devise, grant, or other assurance of title shall have been recorded in the register's office for the county or counties in which the land lies during the full term of said seven (7) years' adverse possession. (Tennessee legislation, 2012)…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 310

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Chapter 2, “Section 406 defines a code of ethics as written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote such behaviors as honest conduct, full disclosure in reports, compliance with all applicable laws and rules, prompt reporting of violations and methods for conforming to the code’s expectations.” Seeing that rules forbid them to hand out personal information they are stuck between two situations which could cause a dramatic outcome. On one side you have investigator trying to find a link as to where the cancer might have come from or began. On the other side before you allow an employee to purse a position with your company they signed a privacy contract to keep all there information private. Giving away this…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most importantly, Mary started a good job after moving to 12 Pudding Lane. She had been working for a local firm known as the Signatures and Technicals. In Might 2016, this company had planned to close all the business actions and the activities of the company. Mary has been unable to have a new job, she has already applied to several employment applications. Because of this critical factor, she has defaulted on her mortgage reimbursements. This has become a crucial issue with respect to the mortgage. Mary has been searching and looking for a new job as soon as possible but she is unable to do so. Showstopper Bank has planned to claim the ownership of 12 Pudding Lane, prior to the sale. They need the recommendations…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Copies of all previous title deeds & link documents establishing chain of title upto present seller…

    • 9996 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A claimed that the lien had been lost when R departed with the title. He wants R to withdraw his caveat so that cross-transfer can be executed. (Because there was caveat, registration of transfer was refused.)…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This Conditional Deed of Sale Agreement is a fact signed by two parties, the FIRST PARTY is the owner/seller (represented by FRANCISCO SAN PEDRO, JR.) a Filipino citizen, of legal age, married residing at Biñang First, Bocaue, Bulacan; and the SECOND PARTY is the Buyer( in the name of RICARDO STA. ANA, JR.) a Filipino citizen, of legal age, married and resident of Dalandanan, City of Valenzuela, Metro Manila ; and of which the subject is a parcel of land specifically described as to wit:…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays