Preview

Law 421 Week 2 Business Law Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law 421 Week 2 Business Law Case
This situation between John and Mark is kind of unique. John signs a contract to sell some of his property to Mark on August 1st, but John delays the date until November 1st and we do not know the reason for Johns delay. This makes Mark must incur additional expenses for his national dog breeding company called Remington Sporting Dog Breeders. Mark must find a suitable alternate location to house his dogs until the new November closing date.
Before I read the chapters this week I looked over this question so I could think about it while reading the chapters, but I began to think about it before I read the chapters. At first I thought that John would have to be liable to pay for Marks expenses because he did not follow through with the contract. I also thought that if John was just a genuine person he would pay for Marks extra expenses to house his dogs for his company because the extra expenses was because of the delay that John caused. I thought that there was more to this situation than we know because it just says that John delayed the closing date,
…show more content…
John did not follow through with his performance that was stated in the contract between himself and Mark. I think that John is liable for Marks extra expenses to house the dogs because he had a breach of contract. In chapter seventeen it talks about tender which is, “a timely offer or expression of wellnesses to pay a debt or perform an obligation.” I think that John should do this because what John did by delaying the closing date of the house made Mark must spend extra money to house his dogs until the new closing date of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff Wendling

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff Wendling, who was a farmer and stockman, met Defendant Puls, who was a cattle buyer in July 1973. The two got to talking and Wendling informed Puls that there was a possibility that he would have cattle for sale around mid August. On August 13th, Puls received a call from Wendling letting him know that he had cattle ready to be sold. The two later met, along with Puls’s financial assistance Watson and agreed on a sales price based on the weight of the cattle on August 16th. Puls left a deposit of 1,000 dollars with Wendling for the cattle. On the scheduled date for pick up, Puls requested an additional week for delivery of the cattle. Needless to say, after the week went by there was no sign of Puls. He failed to respond to any of phone calls or messages left by Wendling. When he was finally able to reach Puls on August 27th, he learned that Puls didn’t have a place to store the cattle. Since there were so many issues, Wendling asked Puls for an additional down payment, which was refused by Puls. Puls went on to suggest that maybe he should just sell his cattle to someone else. At that time, Wendling suggested to Puls that he provide him with a written release, which he just ignored. Wendling went on to seek legal advice and was advised to get a written release from Puls before engaging in another sale of the cattle. Wendling tried to reach Puls, but was unsuccessful; however he was able to reach Watson. He asked Watson if they both would meet him at his lawyers’ office, so that he could obtain a release from the contract in order…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law Ch 4

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    17-3. Daniel is not liable for the debt Rubya defaulted on. The contract did not make Rubya a partner, even those she was given profit sharing and management responsibilities, she did not poses any ownership of the business. Also under UPA 202(c)(3) no presumption of partnership is made since the profits are wages of an employee or for the services of an independent contractor. Not to mention Daniel did not have any knowledge of the credit extended to Rubya.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

      Company A’s Defense: Impracticability and rights to delegate Company A is responsible for the poor workmanship of Company B BREACH OF CONTRACT  Tom’ Offer???  Assessing Tom’s position  Determining Breach Of Contract  Harry’s Legal…

    • 1103 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under these facts, Adam can be found personally liable for the loss even though there is a legal principle, which affords him a degree of protection. The text explains that “the liability of a limited partner, as mentioned, is limited to the capital that she or he contributes or agrees to contribute to the partnership [RULPA 502]. Limited partners enjoy this limited liability only so long as they do not participate in management {RULPA 303]” (Miller, 3-5b).…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 421 WEEK 4

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The only agreement that was made between the two was at the start.. The 90 day period that was paid off by BTT for Chou. After this there was no actual contract. They did discuss about having a contract and making it go through email but in the end there came out to be no contract. As it came out to be with no legal signatures from either of the sides then there was nothing to keep.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/421 Final

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6) Under the U.S. legal system, subject to some exceptions, costs of litigation regarding both the plaintiff and defendant…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 45

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    a) Does Bob have to pay for the car or risk legal action for being in breach of contract if he continues to refuse to pay?…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Facts) The State of Georgia has enacted a law requiring contoured rear-fender mud flaps on all trucks and trailers operating within Georgia. Thirty-five other states allow straight mud flaps and Florida requires straight mud flaps.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Case 3-3

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should a party to a lawsuit have to hand over its confidential business secrets as part of a discovery request? Why or why not? What limitations might a court consider imposing before requiring ATC to produce this material?…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    Mike and Liam can say that Mary is in breach of contract but in fact no acceptance was made on their part. How did they know what time to arrive? Or what color to paint the house? Since acceptance is what makes the offer an oral agreement and a binding contract, no match was made to the offer. When Mary made the offer to pay $2500 for Mike and Liam to paint her house, they should have responded by accepting her offer and even could have bargained by her paying them the money plus supplies.…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has come to my attention that there has been a state level business dispute which is submitted to ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution). So here, I will discuss about the various methods of ADR. Also, I will suggest/recommend which method of ADR should be used to resolve this case out of court. Further, there will be some discussion on differences between traditional litigation process and ADR.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the above subject matter, it is in question whether or not there is a binding contract between Claire Dawn and our client, Mr. Leonardo DeCapo, in the matter of a sale of Claire Dawn’s 1965 Corvette Stingray. I have reviewed all of the relevant facts and documentation provided to us by Mr. DeCapo and have arrived at the following conclusion in regards to this matter:…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Inland transport ( by road, by rail, by barge, by mail, or by mixture)…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mikhail

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first question to be answered is whether the Alexandra’s promise to pay an extra £6,000 to Bertram is enforceable. The general rule is that agreements stemming out of a pre-existing duty are void for lack of consideration as it is the performance of an existing obligation and not sufficient (Stilk v Myrick). But if a promisee has done more than she was contractually obliged to do, then the extra work is consideration provided for the promisor’s promise (Hartley v Ponsonby). This rule can hardly be applied here, as Bertram actually had to perform the job he was contractually obligated to do, he did no extra work.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays