Preview

LAW 531 Week 3 Knowledge Check Study Guide 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1968 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
LAW 531 Week 3 Knowledge Check Study Guide 1
Week 3 Knowledge Check Study Guide
Concepts

Mastery

Agreement, consideration,

Score: 18 / 18

Questions

100%

1

2

3

100%

4

5

6

Intellectual property

100%

7

8

9

Personal property

100%

10

11

12

Real property

100%

13

14

15

100%

16

17

18

and capacity
Remedies for breach of contracts Mislaid, lost, or abandoned property

Concept: Agreement, consideration, and capacity
Mastery

100%

Questions

1

2

3

1.
What is true about the acceptance of a contract?

A. It is effective only once it has reached the offeror, whether or not it has been properly dispatched by the offeree. B. It must not support the mirror image rule.
C. It must be an unequivocal acceptance, without conditions or exceptions.

D. It cannot be expressed with silence, even if the offeree has specified that silence means acceptance.

Correct:
The Correct Answer is: C.
To ensure that the acceptance is valid, an offeree must unequivocally accept the terms of the contract. That is, the acceptance must be explicit and unambiguous and it must have only one possible meaning. An unequivocal acceptance must not contain conditions or exceptions.
2.
Which element of a contract requires something of legal value to be provided in exchange for a promise?

A. Consideration
B. Objective intent
C. Agreement
D. Capacity

Correct:
The Correct Answer is: A.
Consideration is the element of a contract that requires something of legal value to be provided in exchange for a promise. Monetary or property payments are examples of tangible items that add legal value to contracts.
3.
Jason, a 16-year old boy, enters into a contract with a businessperson to work on a construction project. According to the contract, Jason has to work long hours but will get paid a minimal amount because of his age. Jason, though unfamiliar with contracts, knows that the contract is not fair to him. He decides to cancel it. What gives Jason the right to void the contract?

A. Minor’s duty of restoration
B. Infancy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Big Time Toymaker

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This scenario deals with Big Time Toymaker and a contract they were negotiating with Chou, the inventor of a new strategy game that BTT wanted exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. When Chou received an email with the details of what they were going to agree upon, he thought that was the contract and did not proceed in drawing up a contract himself. Months passed and when BTT changed management, they informed Chou that they were not interested in distributing his new strategy game, Strat.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Midterm Studyguide

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Citizens Insurance v. Parsons was an 1881 decision, which established the test to determine governmental jurisdiction. The constitutional issue in this case concerned the validity of the Ontario Fire Insurance Policy Act. Parsons owned a hardware store in Orangeville, which was destroyed by fire one evening. Insured by Citizens Insurance, Parsons asked the company to cover him for his loss. Citizens Insurance refused to pay out on the basis that Parsons failed to comply with the conditions that had been written into the insurance contract. Parsons argued that the conditions failed to comply with provisions in the Ontario Fire Insurance Policy Act. Citizens Insurance argued that the Ontario law is invalid, as it imposes a contract with insurance companies – an aspect of trade and commerce that falls to the jurisdiction of the federal government. Parsons, however, argued that this was an issue of civil and property rights. This case went to trial, and eventually went to the JCPC, who acknowledged that there was a contradiction between S. 91(2) and S. 93(13). The JCPC then decided that although there was a possibility for overlap, there should be some way of determining which level of government has jurisdiction over what subject matter. This lead to the creation of the Parson’s Test. In the Parsons Test, you must consider if the dispute falls within one of the jurisdictions in Section 92 of the provinces. If the answer is no, then the jurisdiction automatically falls to the federal government. If the answer is yes, does it also fall under the power of Section 91? If the answer is no, then it is a provincial area of jurisdiction. However, if the answer is yes to both questions, then the courts must reconcile the constitution in some way as to figure out which level of government has responsibility for jurisdiction.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheeseman outlines that employment is subject to the common law of contracts (2010). Pat entered into an agreement with NewCorp for employment; acting on the premise that NewCorp would uphold all terms of the employment agreement, made major personal and financial changes to be available for employment at the assigned duty location. Although Pat signed a document acknowledging his understanding that NewCorp had the freedom to discharge at will—Pats supervisor told Pat he was being discharged because “things weren’t working out”. NewCorp did not follow company procedure to notify Pat of unsatisfactory performance and neglected to offer a Corrective Action Plan. NewCorp, having a signed copy of the discharge at will document, could argue that the company was not required to offer Pat notification or the opportunity to follow the Corrective Action Plan process. An important factor in this instance is the implication that Pat is being released based on unsatisfactory performance. NewCorp is terminating the employment contract without complying with all clauses of the employment contract and as a result Pat is taking a financial loss. Additionally, an employer under the Plant Closing Act Is exempt from notification of lay off for reasons unforeseeable at the time of notification—this does not appear to be the case in Pats situation (Cheeseman, 2010). In NewCorp’ s defense, the company could consider the employment agreement to be a voidable contract with NewCorp having the option to avoid their contractual obligations, which although Pat suffered a loss from the termination of employment, would be personally liable for any decisions or financial ramifications…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this situation, the court would be in favor of Jeff. The terms or conditions of the contract cannot be fulfilled because he is under age. The dealer will clearly state that he thought Jeff was of legal age, but also admit that he did not check his age. With that in mind, the court would favor Jeff. However, Jeff would not be getting any money back because he knew he was underage and he should have never signed the contract.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What methods of ADR are available to pursue? Which of these ADR methods do you think is the most appropriate? Explain your answer.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    compounds that can be used to make personal care products and clothes. In the context…

    • 2502 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 531 Week 1

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While working as a team it is important that all members set goals and agree to work together. In order to come to a common goal each member must set guidelines and follow them, in order to achieve success. In an instance where team members can’t agree on a certain aspect of their project, an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) will be put in place to ensure completion of the task. The use of an ADR will help the team come to a solution and reduce the risk of failure. A case where two team members can’t come to a resolution within the period of 24 hours will enable (ADR) to take place. The dispute must be in direct relation to the rules defined on the learning team charter. Members’ personal conflicts which cause dispute within the learning team disabling productivity and efficiency will facilitate the ADR process.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contract Breach

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Situations that involve written and oral contracts between clients and contractors happen every day. Quite often, a price is agreed upon based on a completion date and the performance that happens along the way. One such situation that I have experienced was when my Dad decided to purchase a brand new townhouse in a downtown Cincinnati residential redevelopment project. A private contractor named Drees had won the rights from the city to be the only firm that could be used in the construction project and they are very popular there. A contract was signed between my parents and the developers that a new home would be built to their specifications and delivered within a six month period and upon that date they could move in. The focus of this analysis is to bring the contract under scrutiny that existed between Drees and my parents and how the contractor performed their duties.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Test Questions

    • 5406 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Tanisha is suing Fred, seeking money damages for the destruction that Fred caused to her lawn by continually driving across it with his pickup. Tanisha wants to have her attorney sit down with Fred in a conference room and ask him questions in person, so as to gather evidence, with a person representing the court present who will type down all that is said. What type of discovery is Tanisha seeking here?…

    • 5406 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical Analysis Paper

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages

    contract with the managing group of the complex. He knew that if he were to break the contract…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common Law Case Study

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The requirement of acceptance with every binding legal contact is tied closely to the concept of unqualified mutual assent. Only when both parties have given their mutual consent does the law consider a binding legal contact to have been formed. Hence, if the offeree remains silent, their silence cannot constitute an acceptance.[1]…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Breach of Contract

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Breach of contract can happen by a party intentionally breaching the contract or because of unexpected delays. In this paper I will discuss the contract my brother had with an in home appliance sales company.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comlaw 101 Notes

    • 3177 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Some statutes expressly create a right to sue for damages and other remedies. In such a situation it is Parliament that has created the cause of action (civil liability), rather than it being a judge-made obligation.…

    • 3177 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    v. Oscar Zacarias, No. E2014-00122-COA-R3-CV, 2014 WL 4403106 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014) discussed the validity of a signed contract when the individual who signed the contract does not understand English. In the Zacarias case, an agreement was signed between a homeowner and the plaintiff construction company to perform certain work on the residence. The homeowner never paid for the work. Therefore, the construction company sued the homeowner for breach of contract. The homeowner filed a counter-claim asserting he only had a limited understanding of English and that the alleged contract was actually explained to him as an “estimate”. The Trial Court found that because the preponderance of “evidence established that Mr. Zacarias did not know or understand the English language, [t]here was no meeting of the minds and no way for Mr. Zacarias to form a binding contract with Advantage Windows.” Advantage Windows at 2. This case was appealed to the Tennessee Court of…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Values- Principals or attitudes which society sees as important. The moral principles and beliefs which reflect society’s judgment about the importance of different things. a personal belief system…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays