Preview

Law Abiding Citizen

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Abiding Citizen
It’s Not What You Know
When one man loses everything, he is capable of anything. Determined to seek revenge for the loss of his family and for the lack of support from the justice system, Clyde Shelton will not let anyone stand in his way. Law Abiding Citizen is a good thriller film because it is full of suspense, has a strong plot throughout with no “plot holes”, and contains a strong set of complex characters. Clyde Alexander Shelton had his whole world ripped apart one dark night when two burglars came into his home. Clyde lay helpless in the floor as his wife and daughter were murdered and raped before his eyes at the hands of Clarence Darby and his accomplice Rupert Ames. When the case went to trial counselor Nick Rice informed Clyde that the evidence had been deemed inadmissible by the court (Law Abiding Citizen). Since Clyde blacked out during the event his testimony would not be strong enough to convict Darby, so Nick made a deal. Darby testified that Ames committed the murders and in return for his confession Darby received the minimal punishment of three years in prison for murder in the third degree and Ames would receive the death penalty (Law Abiding Citizen). When Clyde became aware of this deal he felt betrayed by Nick and the justice system because he knew that Darby was the one that committed the murders but as Nick stated in the movie, “It’s not what you know Clyde it’s what you can prove in court” (Law Abiding Citizen).
Ten years later Clyde Shelton devised a plan to seek revenge on all who were involved in the trial. He made Ames’ execution the opposite of a “pain free lethal injection” and then captured Darby only to torture him by dismembering every piece of his body (Law Abiding Citizen). Shelton then went on to prove a point to the justice system that they will believe anything that is brought before them and sounds convincing. Nick Rice soon finds out that Clyde is more than just a loving father and a husband, but a “brain” for the



Cited: Law Abiding Citizen. Dir. F. Gary Gray. Perf. Gerald Butler, Jaime Foxx, and Leslie Bibb. Evil Twins, 2009. DVD. The Internet Movie Database. Amazon.com, 2011. Web. 22 Mar. 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ella Jones Case Summary

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When they arrived there he tried to run but they sent the dogs after him. Once they arrived at the station he asked them why they arrested him They told him it was because he murdered Ella Jones. Initially he wanted to deny it, he came around once they told him what they already knew. He told the police that he killed her because she wanted to leave him. He said," since I cannot have her nobody can." Charles is taken into custody; he is being charged for man slaughter. Charles is now going to his preliminary hearing, the judge decided to further the case. In the meantime, they are deciding what his arraignments will be. He does not have bail between his trial date. Charles plead guilty to his charges, the judge found him guilty and sentenced him to twenty years in Lakeside Prison. He will be released when his twenty-year sentence is up. His last six months being in jail he will be transferred to the correctional center to work his way back into…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: After spending a morning and afternoon drinking beer and injecting cocaine, Pervis Tyrone Payne entered the apartment of 28-year-old Charisse Christopher and her two children, Lacie, age two and Nicholas, age three at approximately 3:00 p.m. on June 27th, 1987. Payne made sexual advances toward Charisse Christopher. She resisted, which lead Payne to kill both Charisse and Lacie. Nicholas was found with several severe stab wounds that completely penetrated him front to back, but he managed to survive. Payne was apprehended later that day hiding in the attic of a former girlfriend’s house. Payne was convicted by a jury of two counts of murder. At sentencing, Payne presented the testimony of his mother, father, Bobbie Thomas and a clinical psychologist. These testimonies’ showed Payne was of good character, he attended church and he was of low intelligence and mentally handicapped. The State presented the testimony of Ms. Christopher’s mother, who spoke of the negative impact of the murders on Nicholas. Furthermore, the prosecutor presented argument regarding Nicholas’ experience. The jury sentenced the Payne to death on each count of murder.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: The cases of Mr. Miranda, Mr. Vignera, Mr. Stewart and Mr. Westover had similar cases, regarding the admissibility of their confessions. These cases were then addressed together by the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Miranda was identified by a witness and arrested, but was not notified of his rights, although he singed a written confession after several hours of interrogation that stated that he was aware of the rights he was not notified about. A jury was presented an oral admission of guilt, as well as the written confession. The jury found Mr. Miranda guilty of murder and rape, and sentenced him to 20-30 years on both counts. Mr. Vignera, who was the second defendant, was arrested for a…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1980’s in a small Podunk town of Ada, Oklahoma, a young woman named Debra Sue Carter, was savagely raped and killed in her own apartment after work at the local cocktail bar. Quickly, the town drunk was arrested in relation to the rape and murder with nothing more than a single “eyewitness” that placed him at the woman’s job that night. Many regulars to the bar said that “they would know if Ron Williamson was at the Coach Light and he wasn’t there.” They, in fact, named another man: Glenn Gore, the prosecution's main witness. Gore was also the man that Debbie’s friend said that she was afraid of and he was supposedly at Debbie’s apartment the night of the murder, according to the friend who received a phone call that night from Debbie. Gore was also seen being pushed away by the victim at the victim’s car the same night as the murder.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Hurst had bound, gagged, and then stabbed his coworker over 60 times during a robbery at his place of employment. Her body was found in the freezer and the safe opened and missing hundreds of dollars. Witnesses came forth and testified that Hurst had planned to rob the store, and the night that it happened only Hurst and his now deceased coworker were the only two scheduled to work. The judge had instructed the jury that they could convict Hurst of…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * The third Defendant, Carl Calvin Westover, was arrested for two robberies. Mr. Westover was questioned over fourteen hours by local police, and then was handed to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents, who were able to get signed confessions from Mr. Westover. The authorities did not notify Mr. Westover of his Fifth Amendment constitutional rights.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomkins Research Paper

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page

    On January 10, 2000, two people got shot on the outside of a shopping mall; one person was killed and another wounded. Thompkins was convicted of murder and firearms related charges in Michigan state trial court. Thompkins was arrested one year later, the police officers had him to read a written form with the Miranda Warnings and the officer read the rest of the form to Thompkins. The police officer asks Thompkins to sign the form to show that he understood his right and he refused. The officers interrogated Thompkins for nearly three hours, Thimpkins responses the police officers with “yes”, “no” or “I don’t know”. Thimpkins didn’t state that he wished to invoke his Fifth Amendment right to stay silent. Later, an officer asked Thompkins if…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arizona vs Miranda

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Early in 1963, a 17 years old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police investigated the case, and soon found and arrested a poor, and mentally disturbed man. The name of this man was Ernesto Miranda. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. On March 13, 1963, Miranda was arrested based on circumstantial evidence linking him to the kidnapping and the rape. After 2 police officers interrogated him for 2 hours, he signed a confession to the rape charge. The form he signed included the following statement:…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Verdict Ethics

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The Verdict” is a movie that deals with medical and legal ethics. Frank Gavin is an alcoholic who hasn’t won any of his cases in the past three years. Mickey, his former partner, gives him a medical malpractice case that is sure to settle for a large amount of money. The case of Deborah Ann Kay, a mother who was given anesthetic when she had just eaten inhaled her vomit and is now in a coma. The Donaheys, her sister and brother in law are hoping for a good settlement and Frank assures them that they have a strong case. While the case is going on he meets Laura, a woman at a bar who he falls in love with. Frank goes to visit Deborah Ann Kay in the hospital and is affected by her condition. He meets with the defendants who run the Catholic hospital where the incident happened. The defendants offer $210,000 to settle out of court but Frank declines. Frank feels this is his chance to do something right. Everyone was not happy with Frank declining the settlement. A lot of things start to go wrong for Frank in the case: the brother in law finds out how much the settlement was and how he denied it, his expert medical witness disappears, his substitute witness testimony is questioned, the defendant attorney Concannon has an expert legal team, and the Judge favors Concannon. Mickey finds out Laura is a spy for the opposing side and Frank punches her in the face. Frank then finds Kaitlin Costello Pryce, a nurse that was asked to change her notes on the admittance form after the incident to hide Dr. Towler’s error. Deborah Ann Kay had eaten 1 hour before admittance and no anesthetic is supposed to be given if so. Even though the testimony is not supposed to be used because of legal technicalities it stuns the courtroom. Frank then tells the jury a closing statement about justice and truth. Frank wins the case and the jury wants to increase the award.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first and the most important cause of Milgaard’s wrongful conviction was the question of Milgaard’s two friends, Ron and Nichol. His friends changed the story from the original one and the true version into something the police wanted to listen to. This is because the two friends were heavy drug users and they were put into custody for about 2-3 days, during this time they did not have access to any drugs, which was painful for them. Thus, to leave early, Ron encouraged Nichol to give the police what they wanted to hear and stabbed Milgaard in the back.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2.At the beginning of this movie the jurors vote 11 to 1 to convict the defendant and send him to death for murder; yet by the end of the movie they vote to acquit him, to set him free. What are the events that led the jurors to change their minds so radically and set the defendant free ? Describe the process.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the age of 17, he was charged with the robbery and shooting of Bobby Lambert. His guilt largely relied on the statement of only one observer that claimed she saw the killer's face for a brief second through her car windshield, 30 to 40 feet away. “Judge Trevathan concluded that Skillen’s identification of Graham at trial was “based solely on [her] independent recollection of the facts as they occurred on May 13, 1981,” and was “made independently of any conversation or processes that were performed by members of the Houston Police Department.” He therefore allowed her to testify.” (Capital Punhiment in Context). Two workers from the grocery store were also witnesses, who seen the assailant at close view. They stated that Graham was not the killer however, Graham’s attorney never interviewed them nor, called as witnesses to testify. Three of the jurors who voted to convict Graham signed affidavits saying they would have voted differently had all the evidence been available. (Capital Punhiment in Context). Gary graham was an innocent man killed at the hands of the government and the country. The government need to find new and effective way to determine built without any doubt when taking away a…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Alien

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Legal Alien," a collection from "Chants," is a short free versed poem written by Pat Mora. The poem explores the lives of Mexican-Americans and the cultural tension they have to face. The poet discusses a bi-cultural person whose parents are from Mexico but the person was born and raised in America and is an American citizen by law. Although he can speak fluent English and Spanish, he still has a hard time being accepted by both or one race. Mora's use of poetic techniques such as metaphor, tone and antithesis emphasizes her concerns in regards to the issue.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Law

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the trial on June 19th, Carroll Cooley, the officer who questioned Miranda had admitted that he did not tell Miranda that he was allowed an attorney at the time, and that anything he said could be used against him in court. Alvin Moore believed the confession’s of Miranda were not voluntary and that the confessions should be dismissed. The judge disagreed, and found Miranda guilty on the robbery charges.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non Immigrant Immigrant

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If you’re among those who applied for non-immigrant visa like tourist/visitor’s visa to travel to the United States of America, and you received the blue letter (Visa refusal) from your consular officer after your interview; this indicates your application was refused under Section 214(b) in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics