Preview

Law and the Movies: My Cousin Vinny

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law and the Movies: My Cousin Vinny
Law 199 – Law and the Movies
Final Paper- My Cousin Vinny My Cousin Vinny is a film about the trial of two young men accused of murder in rural Alabama where one of the accused men has his cousin Vinny, a new lawyer, try to defend them. The whole story begins when Billy Gambini and his friend Stan Rothestein are driving through Beechum County, Alabama and they decide to stop at a convenience store. Once they leave the store, Billy realizes he forgot to pay for a can of tuna, and he believes this is why the police had arrested him after the two men had left the store. In reality, after the two men left the store, the store clerk had been shot and killed. Billy and Stan where not pulled over and arrested by the police for stealing a can of tuna; they were arrested for the suspicion of being connected with the murder. While the boys are detained by the police a series of circumstantial evidence and eyewitness reports are used by the authorities to charge Billy with murder, and Stan with accessory to murder. With no other options, Billy is forced to call in his cousin Vinny, a lawyer, as his defense lawyer. Vinny and his fiancé, Mona Lisa Vito, travel down to Beechum County to help out their cousin Billy. However, Vinny is a new lawyer and has no trial experience at all. At first, Vinny does not do well in the case. He does not cross-examine the witness provided by the prosecuting lawyer and he does not bring any witnesses of his own to court. However, later on in the trial Vinny gains some strength as a lawyer. He begins cross-examining the witnesses and experts that Jim Trotter, the prosecuting lawyer, invites to the court. He is able to prove that one of the witnesses has poor eyesight, therefore her testimony is voided. He also proved that one of the witnesses could not possibly have seen the crime, due to the time it takes to prepare grits. Most importantly, he is able to prove that the boys are innocent by having his fiancé, Mona Lisa Vito, prove that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cristabellac Case Study

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is understandable that when one is involved in a case that can lead to time in jail, when it is the appellants turn to talk, the appellant might say the wrong thing at the wrong time. It is known that at one point the appellant had said, he had never driven the green Cadillac that belongs to cristabel pierce. However, on page three paragraph nine evidence shows that the appellant was seen driving the green Cadillac. This shows that the appellants purpose of lying was truly to not seem guilty, and to not be incriminated by his actions. The green Cadillac that the appellant was seen driving that day belonged to Cristabel pierce, the mother of his kids. It is not a coincidence that all of the stolen property was found in cristabels house, where the green Cadillac was parked, Hernandez, who lived across the street also testified on page sixteen paragraph thirteen, that he had asked the appellant what he was doing and he replied by saying he was helping Bernadette move her things, that she knew he was there. Which is not true. Therefore, all of those incidents that prove the appellant is not speaking the truth, make him not only loose credibility but makes him seem more guilty.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Petrocelli is the prosecuting lawyer and is good. She is pushing for the death penalty. She states that everyone involved in the crime is equally guilty including the one who wrestled for the gun, the robber and the two lookouts. She is trying to prove that Steve knew and associated with the two robbers who are bad characters. He was a lookout for them. Two men, James King and "Bobo" Evans entered a drugstore. They were to rob the owner, Mr. Nesbitt. Little did they know Mr. Nesbitt had a licensed gun. There was a struggle and Mr. Nesbitt was shot dead. There was a woman in the store at the time of the crime and…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Underbelly Film Analysis

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The charming gangster Alphonse gets away with the murder by convincing two witnesses not to testify but the killing sets the tone for the mayhem that will follow, and sets Alphonse himself on a path to self-destruction.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco and vanzetti

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The prosecution’s evidence was a mere form of judgment and based on eyewitnesses, in which there was a lack of credible evidence that was positively proved in this case. The prosecution’s claim that there were seven witnesses all near Braintree around the time of the crime who claimed that Sacco looked identical to one of the bandits. The prosecution also claimed that a cap with a hole in it was picked up at the crime scene was similar if not identical to one that Sacco previously owned. The hole might have related to Sacco’s workplace where he religiously hung his cap. One of the seven witnesses, Kelley, claimed the cap was the same brand and color related to Sacco. The evidence against Sacco and Vanzetti about the car relates to when they were arrested. Sacco and…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    28. How does Victor react to Justine’s trial, and what does this show about his…

    • 3236 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassie Character Traits

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    J. knocks at the Logan's door. Cassie quietly lets him into the boys' room. He is badly hurt. T. J. explains that he went with Melvin and R. W. to Strawberry, thinking that they were going to buy him a pearl-handled pistol he had been wanting. Instead, they rob the store and injure the owners. The White boys were wearing masks.as T.J. was talking about how it's gonna be ok when Cassie blurted out,”I know everything's gonna be ok cause’ I’m gonna tell papa.”(Taylor pg 249) cassie knew that any adult would know what to do but T.J. objected. Just after T. J. goes inside, a lynch mob drives up and begins to beat up T. J. and his family. The mob thinks that T. J. and some other black children were responsible for the robbery. In fact, Melvin and R. W. are a part of the mob. Mr. Jameson arrives to try to break up the mob, but they threaten to continue to the Logan property and hang T.J.. When papa and mama are unaware of what is happening cassie tell Stacy,”You promise you won't go down there by yourself.” cassie said bravely. As stacey and Cassie split up Cassie tells papa and papa set the field on fire to start a…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He makes everyone believe by pulling out a duplicate knife. However, juror number eight could be disqualified by the judge if he unearthed information regarding this manner. Jurors…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 8th Juror is a key character throughout the play. He is the only dissenter who votes ‘not guilty’ in the very beginning and says ‘it’s not easy to raise hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.’ As a logical, gentle and thoughtful character, the 8th Juror slowly works out the way to make the jury rethink the case and the possibility of the boy not killing his…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My Cousin Vinny is a hilarious rendition of the American criminal justice system. It taps into various elements of the system as a whole. Most people probably never realize the formality that goes into actually being convicted of a crime. My Cousin Vinny explores many of the steps such as pretrial stages, key actors in the court process, and the criminal trial. There are some difference and similarities between what the movie portrayed and the actual criminal justice process which will be explored.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play he questions the evidence to force the other jurors to think about whether there is any reasonable doubt to vote not guilty. At every opportunity he uses reason and logic to attempt to make the other jurors think about the validity of the evidence. By forcing the trial to continue, this makes the other jurors think about the case and they use their own theories to attempt to make the child “Not Guilty”. As juror 8 states “As far as I know, we’re supposed to decide whether or not the boy on trial is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. We’re not concerned with anyone else’s motives here”. Through the words of juror 8 we can sense the determination from him to discover whether or not the boy is “not guilty beyond reasonable doubt.” He brings his own ideas and does this by fighting against the flawed testimonies of the witnesses. With the many different attitudes of the jurors, this is an appropriate method of persuading as it engages the other jurors to deliberate and discuss without forcing them…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Runaway Jury

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Runaway Jury is an American legal drama/thriller film from 2003. It was directed by Gary Fleder (Don’t Say a Word, The Express) and stars an all-star cast made up of John Cusack (The Thin Red Line, Being John Malkovich), Gene Hackman (No Way Out, The Royal Tenenbaums), Dustin Hoffman (Kramer vs. Kramer, Rain Man), and Rachel Weisz (Enemy at the Gate, The Constant Gardener). Runaway Jury is a film adaptation of John Grisham’s The Runaway Jury, a legal thriller written in 2001.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnny and Ponyboy escape to an abandoned church, and a few days later the church catches fire. Johnny and Ponyboy run into the church to save a group of small children trapped inside, despite Dally’s objections. Dally then runs in after them to help. Ponyboy and Dally escape with minor injuries, but Johnny’s injuries are much worse. If he survived, he would be crippled for life. Johnny dies the next day, right in front of Ponyboy and Dally. Dally loses it, and runs out. Ponyboy goes home to find out that Dally robbed a grocery store. He goes to the lot right in time to see Dally pull out an unloaded gun on the police, instantly being shot and killed.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clockers

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The cops new this taking a blind eye until a murder when Victor, Roland’s brother confesses to the murder Roland feels guilty as the two brothers are seen in a bar near the scene of the crime having a heated argument then Victor leaving just before the murder happened he is the main suspect. Detective Rocco does not believe Victor he thinks it’s a cover up story to help his brother who also is seen near the crime. Dt. Rocco Klein; he was the homicide detective handing the murder case of Darryl. (Quart, L. 1995). His goal was to find out who killed Darryl.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting off the story, Juror #5 voted that the boy was guilty. But, as Juror #8 continued to present evidence, and as the other Jurors said more and more bad things about “kids from that background” he began to change his view. This started when the 8th Juror pulled out a knife that looked exactly like the one the kid had bought. When asked if he thought the boy had lied or not, the 5th Juror replied timidly, “I’m not sure...(Rose 25)” After this, he only needed a little bit more to finally get him to vote not guilty. The Jurors decided to have a secret vote, and when one slip said not guilty, immediately all faces turned to #5. This made him mad, even though he wasn’t the one who changed his vote. He did not like being stereotyped by the other jurors and this helped to influence him changing his vote. After discussions over who could have killed the father if the boy didn’t, and how the old man could have heard the boy shout, “I’m gonna kill you!”, the 5th Juror began to have doubts. Then, Juror #9 told how he thought the old man wanted attention so that is why he said that he heard the boy scream. As the final blow, Juror #10 said that the boy(and people like him) is, “a…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In desperate need of $2,000 to pull off their crime in Western Illinois, Sam and Bill decided kidnapping was the best way to get that money, especially in a town like Summit. Their victim would be a ten year old freckle-faced, cartoon-looking boy, whose name was Johnny, from the Dorset family. Fortunately, the kidnapping worked in their favor, until the kid actually enjoyed being in this situation. While the kid was very energetic and talkative, he was immensely annoying and rather dangerous. Shockingly, the boy terrified the thieves because his imagination got the best of him. Bill took the brunt of it. Terrified, he couldn’t even think of being left alone with this kid. The boy was brutal. He beat, hit, kicked and played much too rough. Putting up with the kid no longer, Sam and Bill made the ransom note for that night. Desperately,…

    • 717 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics