Preview

Law - appeal routes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law - appeal routes
a) Describe the different appeal routes available to the defence from the Magistrates’ court and the Crown Court (18 marks)

An appeal to the Crown Court can be made by a defendant. However this can only be pursued if he or she appeals against their sentence and if their original plea was ‘not guilty’ or appeal against their conviction.
There is no need for leave, as the defendant has an automatic right to appeal.
By appealing, the case is then reheard by judge and two magistrates. Following this, they have the power to confirm the conviction, reverse the decision and acquit the defendant or vary the conviction and find the defendant guilty of a lesser offence. In relation the sentence, they can either to choose to confirm it, increase (only to magistrates’ maximum; 6 months) or decrease.

Appeals of cases stated to the Queen’s Bench Division can only occur when there is a point of law to be questioned, either sent directly from the Magistrates’ or from an appeal to Crown Court.
The Divisional court may confirm, vary or reverse the decision or send the case back to the Magistrates’ Court for them to apply the interpretation of the law.

Additionally, under the Criminal Appeal Act of 1995, the defendant can also appeal the Court of Appeal if the appeal is against their conviction or sentence. In order to appeal to this court, leave is a requirement, however only 30% of defendants get leave.
The defendant can also appeal if the conviction is deemed as ‘unsafe.’
The end of result of the appeal can consist of the conviction being quashed, vary the conviction to lesser offence or change the sentence, or even order to retrial to be made.

On top of this, further appeals can also be made to the Supreme Court, previously known as the House of Lords. This can be done so as the defence have the right to appeal from the Divisional Court or the Court of Appeal, however under the conditions of that the appeal involves a point of law of public

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The decision whether or not to keep the accused on remand is made by the police until they appear in court which is usually the following day.…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo phillion research

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Appeal refers to the appellant, sometimes called the plaintiff in error, must file a notice of appeal, along with the necessary documents, to commence appellate review. The person against whom the appeal is brought, the appellee, then files a brief in response to the appellant's allegations.(http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Appeal+(law) which means requesting a formal change to an official decision. In this case only one appeal had taken place.in 2009 Romeo Phillion sat through his first and last appeal. However, should this appeal even had taken place? The case was reopened in 2006, and in March 2009, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned his 1972 murder conviction and granted him a new trial, in part because a 1968 police report establishing a clear alibi for Phillion had not been turned over to his defence lawyer. (trial.http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/phillion/) due to the fact that Phillion was wrongfully accused he should not have even had an appeal.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The English administrative court is very unlikely to interfere with a coroner’s decision unless it can be challenged on these grounds: illegality, irrationality and proportionality, and procedural impropriety. On the 6th of April 1993 the high court granted leave to six families of the Hillsborough disaster to apply for a judicial review. The grounds of their appeal include: insufficiency of inquiry, the irregularity of proceedings and the emergence of new facts or evidence. LJ McCowan rejected the submission on the 5th of November, ruling that the inquests had been properly conducted and there had been no suppression of evidence . Therefore ruling that it “was not a case on which it would be right to order fresh inquests. In addition, even though there has been cases such as R v North London coroners and R v Avon coroners , whereby the court found that the coroner had misdirected the jury, the court refused to quash the original verdicts and order fresh inquests, as the court saw no benefits in doing so. This indicates how high the threshold for a judicial review…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ocr Law Unit1 Chapter 5

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mode of trial - magistrates decide what they think is suitable and if they will accept jurisdiction (s19 of mag court act 1980 - consider seriousness, nature of case, own powers of punishment, representations of prosecution and defence). Cases involving complex questions of fact or law should go to crown. Prosecutions wishes might be considered also.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ky Court System Structure

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Next is the Court of Appeals with 14 judges. They take cases of limited writ application, misdemeanor, and criminal appeal by right cases that are under a 20 year sentence, civil and limited administrative agency. They also take care of appeal by permission cases.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Superior Court ruled that the appeal should be allowed, and that this evidence should be considered inadmissible since the accused chose not to make any statements - he was practicing his right to remain silent. The police violated his right under s. 7 of the Charter by tricking him into opposing his decision, which then made the trial unjust. An undercover police officer must serve the purpose of observation of suspects, rather than actively drawing out evidence or information in violation of the person’s right to remain silent. Seeing as the statements were the only piece of evidence the Crown had in order to be able to prove the individual guilty, it’s evident that under the current conditions, it’s the admission of the evidence rather…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can sue each other for money but can’t put each other in jail, only the state has the right too.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeal upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault on a police officer and criminal use of a firearm in the 2nd degree.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice 101

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The supreme court is often called the court of last resort, because this is the last place to go to try and appeal a conviction. Justices of the Supreme Court ordinarily do not conduct trials. They decide an appealed case by reading the record of the trial and briefs filed by the parties, and hearing…

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The courts involved in this case was the NSW supreme court as this court has original criminal jurisdiction to murder, manslaughter and attempted murder which is relevant to this case. Regardless of the Supreme Court having authority to hear matters from lower courts, there was no appeal from lower courts as this case was taken directly to NSW supreme court.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Appeals Process Paper

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When any defendant is found guilty, of any charge, is entitled to an appeal to at least one level of appellate court (Meyer & Grant, 2003). An appeal is when a defendant has already been found guilty in court, and they decide to take it to a higher court in order to change the ruling (Meyer & Grant, 2003). Basically it is a process that takes place, because the defendant and their attorney do not feel that the verdict given was accurate; and that could be due to many different reasons.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conditional probabilities of cases being appealed in the three courts are given in the 3 Total rows in the table. For Common Pleas Court, the probability of an appeal is .0401; for Domestic Relations Court, the probability of an appeal is .00348; and for Municipal Court, the probability of an appeal is .00461. Appeals are much more likely in Common Pleas Court. But, even there, only 1 in 25 cases are appealed. The unconditional probability of an appeal across all 3 courts is…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 5th Amendment

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    are expected to tell the truth, even if that truth was to put you in…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Aces Case Study

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If a defendant fails to appear for court when required, the court then issues a warrant for the defendant’s arrest, and orders the forfeiture of the bail bond. Md. Rule 4-217(i). After a defendant fails to appeal, the surety has 90 days, or 180 days if the court extends…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cat advt

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Though the RPA bars a convicted person from contesting elections, the exception carved out under Section 8(4) of the RPA had till now allowed a convicted law-maker to complete his five-year tenure unless his or her appeal is dismissed earlier. It was beyond the power of Parliament to defer the date from which the disqualification will come into effect in the case of sitting MPs and MLAs, the court said, making it clear that the ruling would hold supreme.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays