Preview

Law Case Assignment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Case Assignment
Critical Legal Thinking Case Assignment Three Kristine Turnage
Florida State College at Jacksonville

Business Law and Ethics
BUL 3130
February 22, 2013

Abstract
Compensatory damages are intended to provide a plaintiff with the monetary amount necessary to replace what was lost and nothing more. To be awarded compensatory damages, Pat the plaintiff must prove that he has suffered a legally recognizable harm that is compensable by a certain amount of money that can be objectively determined. Following a breach of contract by the defendant Harry Homeowner, the most common approach taken is to award the sum which would restore the plaintiff Pat to the economic position that he expected from performance of the promise (known as an "expectation measure".)

Critical Legal Thinking Case Assignment Three Analysis of the principles of law and key facts determine that Pat Painter can recover Expectation damages do to Harry Homeowner’s breach of contract. These damages are applied when compensating a victim of a breached contract. Theses damages are awarded in order to place the harmed party in the position he would have been in had the breach not occurred.
Areas and Principles of Law
The areas of law applicable to the factual scenario falls under remedies, if a party breaches a contract, the other is entitled to monetary damages. The purpose of damages is to put the plaintiff in the position it would have been in had the contract been performed. The courts have a method they have developed to determine the appropriate monetary damages in contract cases. The principle of law that is most appropriate for the factual scenario is referred to as expectation damages. Expectation damages give the plaintiff the benefit of its bargain, putting the plaintiff in the cash position they would have been in as if the contract had been complete. The general formula for expectation damages is Expectation Damages = Compensatory Damages + Consequential Damages +

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A valid contract is “breached,” or broken, when one of the parties fails to fulfill the terms of the contract. The party harmed by the failure of the other party to comply with the contract may sue for breach of contract. Most states require that the injured party file a breach of contract lawsuit within a specified period of time, referred to as the statute of limitations. A sample court filing related to a breach of contract can be seen in Example A.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A breach of contract occurs when a party’s duty to perform under a contract is absolute, and that party fails to perform. The duty can be absolute because it was not conditional in the first place; any conditions were either excused or fulfilled; or the duty was not discharged.…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen assignment draft

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages

    rectify substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another”, Ill. Sup. Ct. R.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law case

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of this arbitration paper is written for arbitration meeting conducted on April 4th 2014 for the incident happened in February 15th.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case

    • 5575 Words
    • 23 Pages

    PUSEY, EXR., APPELLANT, v. BATOR ET AL.; GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Pusey v. Bator (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 275.] Torts — Wrongful death — Employer hires independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property — Inherently dangerous work exception — If someone is injured by weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence, employer is vicariously liable even though guard responsible is an employee of the independent contractor. (No. 00-1787 — Submitted October 30, 2001 — Decided February 27, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 98 C.A. 55. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT When an employer hires an independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property, the inherently-dangerous-work exception is triggered such that if someone is injured by the weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence, the employer is vicariously liable even though the guard responsible is an employee of the independent contractor. __________________ DOUGLAS, J. At all times relevant herein, defendant-appellee, Greif…

    • 5575 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case

    • 6864 Words
    • 28 Pages

    | |74 S. Ct. 686; 98 L. Ed. 873; 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2094; 53 |…

    • 6864 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz 2

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (TCO 4) To succeed in an action against the auditor, the client must be able to show that:…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LEGT 1710 BUSINESS AND THE LAW ASSIGNMENT 2: Semester 2, 2013 Length: 2000 words Worth: 20 Marks Due date: Monday 23 September 2013, by 5pm (See Course Outline Part A at para 4.4 for Submission Procedure) Winston operates a business, painting murals and other art works in offices and other commercial buildings. Over the past two years he has bought paint twice a month from Ron, a local paint manufacturer. Recently, Winston bought 100 cans of paint from Ron, which Winston then put in his storeroom together with some valuable works of art. Over the next week, Winston used 10 cans of the paint on one of his jobs, but because of negligent manufacture by Ron, the paint was of poor quality and cased damage to the client’s building. Winston had to pay $20, 000 compensation to the client. Later, 40 of the other cans exploded in the storeroom and damaged Winston’s valuable works of art. This happened because Jeff, one of Ron’s employees, had a personal grievance against Winston and deliberately put the wrong substance into those 40 cans. The damage to the works of art is worth $40, 000. Winston has demanded compensation from Ron. However, there is a notice on the receipt that Ron gave to Winston at the time of purchase that states: “Ron is not liable for any loss or damage caused by the paint, regardless of how much loss or damage may be caused.” The same words also appear on a small sign on the counter of…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    law assignment USA

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Answer all questions in detail (At least 15 lines AND no more than 50 lines for each answer – including sub sections). Provide your justification based on earlier cases or other supporting material. Structure and presentation of your answers will affect the points. (Cite your references in the body of the answers if needed)…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Assignment

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages

    • demonstrate understanding of the legal environment, including relevant laws as well as economic, ethical, social/cultural, international and political issues;…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conveniently, the approach in assessing damages in tort and contract are mainly identical. Thus, any differences in their principles can be analysed in parallel. Such principles can be divided into three categories i.e. (1) basis of compensation; (2) principles limiting compensatory damages; and (3) types of loss. They are by no means mutually exclusive, but instead may overlap each other. They are merely categorised as such to ease understanding to the law of damages…

    • 4687 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Law

    • 19282 Words
    • 78 Pages

    African Consolidated Resources Plc and Others Minister of Mines and Mining Development and Others (HC 6411/07) [2010] ZWHHC 86 (6 September 2010)…

    • 19282 Words
    • 78 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Mcq

    • 6463 Words
    • 22 Pages

    The correct answer: Pecuniary damagesINCORRECT. The major form of relief in contract cases is monetary damages. Other potential types of damages are equitable, and tort damages, including punitive damages.…

    • 6463 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Assignment

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    (a) Briefly explain the history of the English common law prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. (5 marks)…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common Law and Equity

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition to that, the common law uses damages as a remedy for cases. The aim of damages is to compensate the plaintiff which was not always an adequate solution to every problem. This is because, not everyone wanted money some wanted injunction or just an apology.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics