In law, a sentence forms the final explicit act of a judge-ruled process, and also the symbolic principal act connected to his function. The sentence can generally involve a decree of imprisonment, a fine and/or other punishments against a defendant convicted of a crime. Those imprisoned for multiple crimes, will serve a consecutive sentence (in which the period of imprisonment equals the sum of all the sentences), a concurrent sentence (in which the period of imprisonment equals the length of the longest sentence), or somewhere in between, sometimes subject to a cap. If a sentence gets reduced to a less harsh punishment, then the sentence is said to have been "mitigated" or "commuted". Rarely (depending on circumstances) murder charges are "mitigated" and reduced to manslaughter charges. However, in certain legal systems, a defendant may be punished beyond the terms of the sentence, e.g. social stigma, loss of governmental benefits, or, collectively, the collateral consequences of criminal charges.
Statutes often specify the range of penalties that can be imposed for various offenses, and sentencing guidelines sometimes regulate what punishment within those ranges can be imposed given a certain set of offense and offender characteristics. However, in some jurisdictions, prosecutors have great influence over the punishments actually handed down, by virtue of their discretion to decide what offenses to charge the offender with and what facts they will seek to prove or to ask the defendant to stipulate to in a plea agreement. It has been argued that legislators have an incentive to enact tougher sentences than even they would like to see applied to the typical defendant, since they recognize that the blame for an inadequate sentencing range to handle a particular egregious crime would fall upon legislators, but the blame for excessive punishments would fall upon prosecutors.[1]
Sentencing law sometimes includes "cliffs" that result in much stiffer penalties when certain facts apply. For instance, an armed career criminal or habitual offender law may subject a defendant to a significant increase in his sentence if he commits a third offense of a certain kind. This makes it difficult for fine gradations in punishments to be achieved.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1. Prosecutors do have discretion as to which suspects to charge with an offense but under a great deal of…
- 2328 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
1. (TCO A) The relationship between speed of innovation and product obsolescence is (Points : 5)…
- 4005 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…
- 992 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Punishment may sound like painful word, but in fact it is nothing more but a consequence given to a criminal offender. The state and federal correction system have similar objectives for criminal offenders as a form of punishment. Due to request for harsher punishment, sentencing affects both the state and federal correction system. Upon pleading or finding an offender guilty, the determinate and indeterminate sentencing model is implied in which the federal and state correctional system assigns to criminals for time given in prison.…
- 939 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Judges have lost the ability to tailor the sentence to fit the circumstances of each individual case. One size does not fit all. The Guidelines are one cause of the dramatic growth in the federal justice system. A system intended to streamline and simplify the sentencing process has instead created a far more complex system that has clogged the courts with appeals over Guidelines' applications. Furthermore, the federal Guidelines are not simply guidelines, as the name suggests: they are mandatory. Judges are required to follow them, no matter how inappropriate the result (Anderson,…
- 2036 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…
- 1908 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
A judge will take into account the guidelines set forth by the State’s Penal Code, as well as those brought forward by the defense attorney. An offender’s criminal history, involvement in the crime, and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime will all be considered in deciding whether to hand down a harsher or more lenient punishment. An offender who is considered a first-time offender may be granted leniency or a reduced sentence, but strong arguments can be made in favor and opposition of such a practice. Finally, punishment serves multiple purposes, for the victims of crime as well as the public, and the benefit for all involved should be considered. Ultimately, the judge will review all mitigating circumstances and deliver what he or she believes to be a fair sentence for each individual…
- 951 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
give police, prosecutors, and judges broad discretion in deciding who gets arrested, charged, and sentenced to prison;…
- 1237 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Assorted sentencing philosophies continue to permeate state-level judicial systems. Each state has governed its own laws, and making changes of the statutes are not likely. There is a huge variation from one state to another in the laws and procedures that control the imposition of criminal sanctions.…
- 830 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The sentence imposed typically included incarceration, probation, and fines. Under this scheme, a judge typically will impose a sentencing range rather than a specific time, allowing a parole board to decide when to release the offender. An example of this is when an offender is convicted of homicide and is sentenced to twenty-five years to life. The offender understands that he or she will spend the minimum time of twenty-five years incarcerated but may be required to serve a sentence of up to a maximum of life. The actual amount of time spent after the twenty-five years will depend on the conduct and success in the rehabilitative process of the offender during his or her time…
- 903 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
An indeterminate sentencing is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. A judge can prescribe a particular term, after which an administrative body known as the parole board decides at what point the offender is to be released. A prisoner is aware that he or she is eligible for parole as soon as the minimum time has been served and that good behavior can further shorten the sentence.In determinate sentencing, a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. If the legislature deems that the punishment for a first-time armed robber is ten years, then the judge has no choice but to impose a sentence of ten years and the criminal will serve ten years minus good time before being freed. In good times sentencing, a reduction in time served by prisoners based on good behavior, conformity to rules, and ther positive actions. In truth-in-sentencing laws, legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve approximately the terms to whinch they were initially sentenced. The sentencing ritual strongly lends itself to the concept of individualized justice. Most judges consider two factors above all others: the seriousness of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating…
- 1004 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the main problems with sentencing in the courts today is the broad nature of the crimes committed, in the legal system of England and Wales criminal offences are very broadly defined and can have widely varying degrees of severity, for example theft could be anything from stealing a chocolate bar from a corner shop, all of the way up to stealing the crown jewels.…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
particular sentences in place for the crimes they commit. Murderers are looked at in a different…
- 1087 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The factors that go into determining sentencing are broke into three steps. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. A factor that can change incarceration time is that of “good time”, this is when a reduction in time served by a prisoner is based on good behavior and other positive actions. This is said to promote discipline…
- 353 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The first one is on the Legislative authority. When the public opinion moves toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, the legislatures have responded to this by asserting their power over the sentencing guidelines. Because they are responsible for making up the laws, they are also responsible for passing the criminal code that will determine the length of ones sentence. Within the Legislative Sentencing Authority, there are three different types of sentencing. First you have the indeterminate sentencing. This is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible for parole. The next type is determinate sentencing. This is when a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. Another name for this sentence is fixed sentence. As the names implies, the offender serves exactly the amount of time to which she or he is sentenced. Another legislative sentencing is good time and truth in sentencing. A good time is a reduction of time served for good behavior. This kind of program promotes discipline within a correctional institution. It is also a way to prevent overcrowding of jails. The truth in sentence is when the legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve…
- 1122 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays