Preview

Law Notes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2144 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Notes
*44 Cehave N. v. v Bremer Handelsgesellschaft M.B.H.
The Hansa Nord
Court of Appeal
16 July 1975
[1975] 3 W.L.R. 447
[1976] Q.B. 44 Lord Denning M.R. , Roskill and Ormrod L.JJ.
1975 June 10, 11, 12, 13, 16; July 16
Contract—Condition or warranty—Intermediate stipulation—Whether breach goes to root of contract—Carriage by sea—Stipulation for "shipment... in good condition"
Sale of Goods—Description—Merchantable quality—Citrus pulp pellets for use in cattle food—Substantial part damaged—Rejection by buyers—Goods used in cattle food—Whether of "merchantable quality"—Whether buyers entitled to reject— Sale of Goods Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 71), ss. 11 (1) (b), 14 (1) (2)
Ships' Names—Hansa Nord
1 By contracts of sale in September 1970 German sellers agreed to sell to Dutch buyers 12,000 tons of U.S. citrus pulp pellets c.i.f. Rotterdam for use as animal feed. The contracts incorporated the trade association term "shipment to be made in good condition." Following the buyers' payment of the price of some £100,000 and receipt of the shipping documents, a shipment on the Hansa Nord, with 1,260 tons of pellets in no. 1 hold and 2,053 tons in no. 2 hold, arrived in Rotterdam on May 21, 1970, by which time the market price of citrus pulp pellets had fallen. On May 22 discharge of the pellets into lighters commenced. Much of the cargo in no. 1 hold was found to be damaged while the goods in no. 2 hold were in substantially good condition. On May 24 the buyers rejected the whole cargo from both holds and claimed repayment of the price on the ground that the shipment was not made in good condition. The sellers rejected the claim.
By an order made by the Rotterdam county court on the ex parte application of the lighter owners the whole cargo of pellets from both holds was sold for £30,000 net on June 2 to an importer of such pellets who on the same day resold the whole cargo to the buyers for the same sum of £30,000. The buyers then used "the entire cargo

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: Frigaliment sued B.N.S. There were two contracts that involved selling chickens. In the first contract B.N.S was in agreeance with selling 75,000 pounds of 2.5-3 pounds of chicken, to Frigaliment. 50,000 pounds of chicken at 2.5-3 pounds at a higher price were agreed in the second contract. B.N.S fulfilled the first contract with two shipments. The first shipment fell short. B.N.S made up for the short shipment in their second shipment. Frigaliment accused B.N.S of shipping the larger chicken not to their expectations. Frigaliment protested the rest of the shipments. B.N.S said that their only obligations was to ship chicken that met the requirements stated in the contract.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies Summary Notes

    • 5906 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Representative government- means that the government must represent the views and interests of the people who voted them in. if they fail to do so then they will not be elected the next time, or could be kicked out of the parliament by the Governor General. Responsible government- the government must be answerable to the people and the parliament for its actions. If they fail to do so then they won’t be re-elected. Separation of power The power of government is divided into 3 main factions, Legislature, Executive and Judiciary. This is done so no-absolute person or body holds all the powers of the government and also so to prevent the parliament from possible abuse over power.    Legislature- is in chapter one of the commonwealth constitution, which is made up of the parliament members. They have the power to make laws. Executive- is in chapter two of the commonwealth constitution, made up of the Prime Minster and its Cabinet. They have the power to administer laws. Judiciary- is in chapter three of the commonwealth constitution, made up of the courts. They have the power to interpret and enforce laws.…

    • 5906 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAWS1061 Exam Notes

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Private – an interference affecting private rights of an individual, specifically concerning the use of their land.…

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    difficult to determine the amount of money that the cargo itself would be worth today, but…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case List S2 2014

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hide & Skin Trading Pty Ltd v Oceanic Meat Traders Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 310…

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 21 P1

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Make sure you cover when and how a contract comes in to existence, invitations to treat, offer, acceptance and counter offers.)…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Studies 3/4 Notes

    • 9289 Words
    • 38 Pages

    The Principle of Representative Government • • • • • Government for the people, by the people People elect representatives Answerable to the people for their actions Must represent the views of the majority of people Failure to represent = loss of confidence = loss of government…

    • 9289 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Studies Notes

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages

    The government must embody the concerns, expectations & interests of the people who voted them in last election and protect these interests in their law-making.…

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AS Law Notes

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conciliation is a process that offers parties in a dispute an opportunity to meet together, with the benefit of a third party - a conciliator - to try to reach a settlement out of court. The process usually takes about eight weeks. Discussing the issues and the context within which the dispute has arisen, gives both parties the opportunity to find workable agreeable solutions.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assignments Maritime LAw

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages

    My first advice is to ask The Theatre of Wine is that they need to know key important factors; The claimant need to prove when the defendant’s period of responsibility for the goods begin, and what was the condition of the goods at the time. In establishing the condition and the quantity of the goods at the start of the defendant’s period of responsibility, the claimant will be able to rely on the common law and statutory rules that governs the effect of the statements in shipping documents, such as bill of lading. As to this case there are no information about the about the period when the wine were transported, date when the contract has taken place and delivery terms, no information about how the cargo was stowed and also no information from the claimant about how the documents would be issued such as the mate receipt, final and initial draft survey report of the vessel before loading the cargo and bill of lading. Also, under every contract of carriage of goods by sea the carrier, in relation to loading, handling, stowage, carriage, custody, care and discharge of the goods shall be subject to the responsibilities and liabilities and entitle to the rights and immunities, also whether the cargo was in good condition or not, the quantity or units of the consignment was not declared by the claimant before the cargo was loaded and have not been described on the bill of lading. In that case the carrier or the ship should not become liable for any loss or damage in connection with the consignment if the amount exceeding the equivalent of 10,000 francs per package or unit 30 francs per kilo of gross weight of the goods lost or damaged, whichever…

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Dockray, M, Cases and Materials on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, 3rd ed., Cavendish Publishing Ltd 2004…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    case review payne v cave

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The plaintiff’s counsel opened the case with as: the goods were put up in one lot at an auction. There were several bidders of which the defendant was the last bidder. The defendant had bid 401. The auctioneer had dwelt on the bidding. As the auctioneer dwelt the defendant said, “Why do you dwell? You will get no more. The defendant said he was informed the worm weighed at least 1300 cwt and was worth more than 401. The defendant asked him if he could warrant it to weigh so much, and receiving a answer in the negative he then declared that he would not take it, and refused to pay for it. It was re-sold on the subsequent day’s sale for 301 to the defendant. Against which the action was brought for the difference.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In October, 1919, the appellants, Mr. Norris, Mr. White, and Mr. Browning (called for the purposes of the assessments and this appeal the "Cape Brandy Syndicate"), appealed against assessments to excess profits duty for the accounting periods March 11, 1916 - December 31, 1916, and January 1, 1917 - September 17, 1917. The three appellants were members of different firms, but the assessments in question were made in respect of profits arising from certain transactions undertaken by them on their joint account and not on behalf of their respective firms. In 1916 the appellants agreed to purchase certain brandy from the Cape Government on joint account. They first bought 100 casks, at the same time inquiring how much more was available, and, later in the same year, they bought two further lots of 1500 casks each. These 3100 casks constituted the whole amount the Cape Government had to offer, and the fact that the purchase was made in three instalments was because the appellants were not aware, in the first instance, how much there was for sale. Their intention was to buy all that was available. After the purchase the appellants sold some of the brandy for shipment to the East; the remainder they shipped to London, where, on its arrival, it was blended with French brandy purchased by the appellants for the purpose. The brandy so blended was sold on commission on behalf of the appellants. There were about 100 transactions of sale in all, the first taking place on July 1, 1916, and the last on September 17, 1917. The appellants received the profits of the sales after deduction of the agents' selling commissions and the expenses incurred on the appellants' behalf. It was admitted that the appellants' intention in purchasing the brandy was to sell the whole of it at a profit. None of the appellants had previously or since been engaged in a similar transaction.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vicarious Liability

    • 6124 Words
    • 25 Pages

    “Vicarious” means, “in place of another”. Although we are generally only liable for our own wrongful actions in certain circumstances a person who is not at fault can be held liable for the delict of another. This usually occurs in partnership, agency, motor car accidents and employment, these are instances where there is a special relationship between the person held accountable and the person who committed the delict which provides allows for the former to incur the liabilty.…

    • 6124 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comlaw Notes

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Under authority delegated or conferred by an Act of the NZ parliament (regulation or a bylaw).…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics