Law of Acceleration
Law of Acceleration (1907)
by Henry Adams (1838-1918)
Images are not arguments, rarely even lead to proof, but the mind craves them, and, of late
more than ever, the keenest experimenters find twenty images better than one, especially if
contradictory; since the human mind has already learned to deal in contradictions.
The image needed here is that of a new center, or preponderating mass, artificially introduced
on earth in the midst of a system of attractive forces that previously made their own
equilibrium, and constantly induced to accelerate its motion till it shall establish a new
equilibrium. A dynamic theory would begin by assuming that all history, terrestrial or cosmic, mechanical or intellectual, would be reducible to this formula if we knew the facts.
For convenience, the most familiar image should come first; and this is probably that of the comet, or meteoric streams, like the Leonids and Perseids; a complex of minute mechanical agencies, reacting within and without, and guided by the sum of forces attracting or deflecting it. Nothing forbids one to assume that the man-meteorite might grow, as an acorn does, absorbing light, heat, electricity,--or thought; for, in recent times, such transference of energy has become a familiar idea; but the simplest figure, at first, is that of a perfect comet,--say that of 1843,--which drops from space, in a straight line, at the regular acceleration of speed, directly into the sun, and after wheeling sharply about it, in heat that ought to dissipate any known substance, turns back unharmed, in defiance of law, by the path on which it came. The mind, by analogy, may figure as such a comet, the better because it also defies law.
Motion is the ultimate object of science, and measures of motion are many; but with thought as with matter, the true measure is mass in its astronomic sense—the sum or difference of attractive forces. Science has quite enough trouble in measuring its material
by Henry Adams (1838-1918)
Images are not arguments, rarely even lead to proof, but the mind craves them, and, of late
more than ever, the keenest experimenters find twenty images better than one, especially if
contradictory; since the human mind has already learned to deal in contradictions.
The image needed here is that of a new center, or preponderating mass, artificially introduced
on earth in the midst of a system of attractive forces that previously made their own
equilibrium, and constantly induced to accelerate its motion till it shall establish a new
equilibrium. A dynamic theory would begin by assuming that all history, terrestrial or cosmic, mechanical or intellectual, would be reducible to this formula if we knew the facts.
For convenience, the most familiar image should come first; and this is probably that of the comet, or meteoric streams, like the Leonids and Perseids; a complex of minute mechanical agencies, reacting within and without, and guided by the sum of forces attracting or deflecting it. Nothing forbids one to assume that the man-meteorite might grow, as an acorn does, absorbing light, heat, electricity,--or thought; for, in recent times, such transference of energy has become a familiar idea; but the simplest figure, at first, is that of a perfect comet,--say that of 1843,--which drops from space, in a straight line, at the regular acceleration of speed, directly into the sun, and after wheeling sharply about it, in heat that ought to dissipate any known substance, turns back unharmed, in defiance of law, by the path on which it came. The mind, by analogy, may figure as such a comet, the better because it also defies law.
Motion is the ultimate object of science, and measures of motion are many; but with thought as with matter, the true measure is mass in its astronomic sense—the sum or difference of attractive forces. Science has quite enough trouble in measuring its material