One example would be when they chose to market the ViroBlax drug when there was only a one percent outbreak of the disease in Candore. Due to the higher percentage later on in the simulation, the government was able to step in to allow cheaper drugs worth the three percent outbreak that had occurred. The contract that had been formulated allowed CadMex full global marketing rights and Candore 's action to offer the drug when there was only a one percent outbreak broke that portion of the…
Consequence have been already passed on through Gail to Wes then to Julian, this has effected each and everyone one of them. Gail started off by find out what Wes's brother "Frank" does to Indian patients through Maire Little Solider. This made Gail somewhat concerned and devastated, this ended knowing what's best by telling Wes about the concern. Now that has been stated, Wes is under a lot of pressure, has to make a decision whether or not if he should lock up his brother "Frank" in the public Jail Cell but doesn’t want to cause, Wes doesn’t want to look "Jealous" about Franks ambitions to the public town of Bentrock, just as his father Julian assumed, or he could arrest him in the down stairs basement, where no one can find him or notice.…
Pete, from “Sucker,” a short story by Carson McCullers, is a very dynamic character who changes a lot throughout the story. The story is mainly about Pete and his cousin, Sucker. The story focuses on how Sucker looked up to Pete, but tragically, Pete started to become hostile to Sucker, which broke their bond. This all happened because Pete had a relationship with a girl named Maybelle, who after a while broke up with Pete. This is what caused Pete to start acting hostile towards Sucker.…
It is not all clear that all of the examples that double effect has been invoked to justify can be explained by a single principle. Proponents of double effect have always acknowledged that a proportionality condition must be satisfied when double effect is applied, but this condition typically requires only that the good effect outweigh the foreseen bad effect or that there be sufficient reason for causing the bad effect. Some critics of the double effect has been invoked, substantive independent justifications are implicitly relied upon, and are in fact, doing all of the justificatory work (Uniacke 1984).…
Joel Feinberg says that the harm principle can require certain types of actions. He agrees that the harm principle prevents harm from happening to the public but he also interprets the harm principle in a way that gives the public access to certain types of benefits that prevent harm. However, these benefits are made available by requiring taking action on the public. These benefits include but are not limited too, items such as paying taxes. By requiring the public to pay taxes then they are supporting public benefits.…
Sailors come in contact with Native Americans, who contract the disease and die after infecting their relatives and neighbors, who continue to spread the disease.…
Guidepost six warns to beware of the secondary effects. The perfect example of how this applies to government spending is in the text book. The government wanted to reduce the amount of gasoline that American’s consumed and forced automobile companies to design their cars with better fuel efficiency. In order to do this, the companies had to change the weight and size of the cars which ultimately led to a statistic of approximately 2500 vehicle deaths per year. There was obviously no intention by the federal government to have a statistic like this come up, but the tradeoff of saving money on gasoline by having more efficient cars was caused the secondary effect that they could not have predicted. This prediction could have and in all reality should have occurred with the eighth guidepost where testing the theory would have been important. Maybe before mandating the vehicle companies to make more efficient cars they could have predicted the unsafe risks of lighter vehicles that did not handle as well as heavier gasoline powered vehicles.…
Duff = “responsibility is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of liability” An actor is responsible when they are sufficiently blameworthy in causing the harm or committing the wrong = we blame those who have control over their actions (committing a crime is a mental process)…
"In addition to theses endless pleading of self-interest, there is a second main factor that spawns new economic fallacies every day. This is the persistent tendency of men to see only the immediate effects of a given policy, or its effects only on a special group and to neglect to inquire what the long-run effects of that policy will be not only on that special group but on all groups. It is the fallacy of overlooking secondary consequences" (Hazlitt p15-16).…
The theory of natural law originates from Aristotle’s idea of goodness as fitness for purpose and stoic’s concept of a universal law of reason which is in agreement with nature. What we now call human nature. This point is then furthered by Aquinas who agrees with the argument but furthers it by linking it with his Christian belief by saying following this law is equivalent to following the command of God as human nature is in us inbuilt into us from when God created us.…
“The law of unintended consequences is what happens when a simple system tries to regulate a complex system. The political system is simple; it operates with limited information (rational ignorance), short time horizons, low feedback, and poor and misaligned incentives. Society in contrast is a complex, evolving, high-feedback, incentive-driven system. When a simple system tries to regulate a complex system you often get unintended consequences.” (1)…
Leman, Kevin, Randy Carlson. "When a Child Is Old Enough to Be Spanked and How Should It Be Done?" Christian Answers® Network™ (ChristianAnswers.Net): Multilingual Answers, Reviews, Ministry Resources, and More! [Home]. 1996. Web. 15 Feb. 2011. .…
After reading this passage it helped me reflect on myself. The reason was because I could relate to Tiffany Anderson. I think I could relate to her because my first job was working in a mall at The Limited. I had an exciting job to be a sales associate, and sometimes helped unpack stock for new floor events. Even though I have a son now, I remember the reason why I wanted a job. To have things and to not rely on my parents support. Basically to feel important in the world and go out and hang with my friends. My parents only gave us our needs, for I always knew my wants were only rewarded if I worked for it. Truly there are many people that go through a lot more than I did, at that time in my life. I have been thankful that I had support from my family and still do. I think a soon as Tiffany Anderson received the note, she changed as a person. Even though she may not understood the writing, however she did have some ideas. She mentioned the imagination of a “women, my age but skinny, with sunken eyes and black hair, locked into a blindingly hot factory…
Causal determinism claims that our past, initial conditions are deterministicly conditioned by natural laws. Causal determinism deals with conditional predictability, which says that if I know all of my past/present material conditions and natural laws, then I can know my future causal path. Since we always base our choices on our highest desire, we can easily predict what choices one is going to make.…
Punishment is described by the Webster Dictionary as ‘the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution to an offense’. Today, this definition may pass as true for many governments, but years ago when philosophers were discussing ideas about government and laws, one idea that stuck out was that of punishment. Different theories rose regarding justifying punishment, and deciding the purpose behind punishing people. Joel Feinberg, Jules Coleman, and Christopher Kutz are three philosophers that spent a lot of time discussing their beliefs and ideas about punishment.…