Preview

Laws of Hammubari

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Laws of Hammubari
PART 1:
The first law of the Hammurabi’s Code of Laws, ‘If anyone ensnare another, putting a ban upon him, but he cannot prove it, then he that ensnared him shall be put to death.’ The meaning of this code is that if you accuse someone of a crime you better be able to re-enforce your statement or if you can’t then you will be put to death. The 106th law of the Hammurabi’s Code: ‘If the agent accept money from the merchant, but have a quarrel with the merchant (denying the receipt), then shall the merchant swear before God and witnesses that he has given this money to the agent, and the agent shall pay him three times the sum.’ This basically means that if a person has borrowed money and if the person who borrowed the money decides to deny that he has borrowed any money from the merchant the merchant can swear, to/in front of his god and witness, that he has lent money to the person. After swearing in front of his god and witnesses the merchant is to receive triple the amount that he has lent to the person. Law 22, ‘If anyone is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put to death.’ If anyone is seen/caught breaking into another person’s household the thief shall be punished and the punishment is death. Law 2, ‘If any one bring an accusation against a man, and the accused go to the river and leap into the river, if he sink in the river his accuser shall take possession of his house. But if the river prove that the accused is not guilty, and he escape unhurt, then he who had brought the accusation shall be put to death, while he who leaped into the river shall take possession of the house that had belonged to his accuser.’ This law is saying that if anyone accuses someone else and the person being accused leaps into a river. If the person being accused sinks the accuser can take the victims house. But if the person who is accused does not sink/or escapes without a scratch can take possession of the accuser’s house. Law 3, ‘If any one bring an accusation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of property laws. In law 21 (excerpts from hammurabi’s code circa 1754 BCE. Doc E) it says “ If a man has broken the wall (to rob) a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him the hole in the wall which he has made. Would you want a dead body in your house? Do you want your kids to see a man killed in your house? All of this seems like they will not clean up the body and they will just leave it there. When kids see a dead body they normally scream. When they actually see the person die they will have major trauma and that could affect their life forever.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Document E says “Law 209: If a man strikes the daughter of a free man and causes her to lose the fruit of her womb, he shall pay 10 shekels of silver…,” This quotation means that the man must pay for the life he has caused to be lost. This matters because in Mesopotamia, you had to pay if you caused the lost a life. Another quotation would be “Law 215: If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on the body of a free man...and save the man’s life, he shall receive 10 shekels of silver.” This quotation means that a surgeon would be rewarded for the life he has saved. The quotation matters because we now know that in Mesopotamia, you were rewarded for saving a…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi DBQ

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “if a man has borrowed money to plant his fields and a storm has flooded or carried away his crops in that year he does not have to pay his creditor”.In my own words this means that if someone bporrows money from someone and his crops fooded or carried away by a flood he doesnt have to pay the person.This evidence says that hammurabis code is just because it wasnt the persons fault that his crops were carried away.In document D it says…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Code Dbq

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin with, Hammurabi’s Code threatened the family. For example, in law 129, it said if a married woman is caught with another man, they will both get tied up and cast to water. Also, in law 195, it said that if a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off. Based on what I read, in law 129, you cannot be with another man or they will kill both of you. Law 129 shows, if you hit your father they will cut your hands off and now the family is going to get separated. As you can see, these laws are supposed to protect you, but either way you get hurt.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin with, Hammurabi’s code was just because it helped the family be together. For instance, in Law 129 it says if a married lady is caught in adultery, they shall both be bind and cast into water. Also, in Law 195 it says that if a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off. Based on what I read, Law 129 helped the lady and the man be together. On Law 125 it shows that it helped children be obedient. As you can see, these Laws helped the family be together by being obedient.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hammurabi’s laws were based on the harsh “eye for eye, tooth for tooth” mentality of the ancient era, requiring a death penalty for many slight offenses. For example, according to the twenty-first law in Hammurabi’s code, “if any one breaks a hole into a house (break in to steal), he shall be put to death before that hole and be buried” (citation). In accordance to this law, anyone who tried—it did not matter if he actually did—to steal and was caught would be sentenced to death instantly. In fact, the Code further stated that even people who were discovered merely buying items from a robber would also be sentenced to death. This was not fair because if the robber is found but…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The code was very harsh, a person in this society could be put to death for almost anything. “Any one steal cattle or sheep, or an ass, or a pig or a goat, if it belong to a god or to the court, the thief shall pay thirtyfold therefor; if they belonged to a freed man of the king he shall pay tenfold; if the thief has nothing with which to pay he shall be put to death” (Hammurabi Code). This is a good example of the punishments being different depending on the social class. The poor people who may need the cattle get the worst treatment if you have money or steal from someone who doesn't have money the punishment is not that severe. This punishment system today would be equivalent to us letting prisoners free if they could afford it which makes the different punishments for each social class very…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit I Dbq

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi's code of law in document one of the many methods by which rulers established their power. Like many rulers, Hammaurabi created a code of law, that the people in his empire had to adhere to. Creating a code of law was not meant to be cruel but to inform people living within the empire that their were rules and regulations that they had to follow. “If any one steal the property of a temple or of the court, he shall be put to death,and also the one who receives the stolen thing from him shall be put to death.” Law number six makes it evident that religion played a part in society and people had to respect that as well.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The secular laws of Babylon were laid down by Hammurabi in “The Code of Hammurabi”, and in the book of Exodus. These laws provided stability and order in those respective societies. As society depended upon them, it is natural to assume that the laws relied upon society as well and reflect the values held by each society, not only in the laws themselves, but also in how they are written, whom they pertain to and how they are executed. While at first glance the law codes appear similar, there are a number of differences that provide key insight to what was held dear in each society. How do differences in these two law codes attest to differences in the two societies which pronounced them, and likewise, what can be learned from their similarities? These questions will be answered by analyzing the background history of the law codes, the laws themselves, how justice was administered, and the differences and similarities between the punishments for similar offences. This approach will give a comprehensive picture of the law codes and make it possible to see the social reasons behind the differences.…

    • 3191 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia, “the Land between Rivers,” was one of the greatest and the oldest ancient civilizations of the world. This civilization flourished around 3000 B.C.E. on the piece of fertile land, now known as Iraq, between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. Before 1792 B.C.E the city-states of ancient Mesopotamia were not united and constantly clashed in turmoil and warfare. In 1792 B.C.E King Hammurabi conquered and merged the neighboring city-states of ancient Mesopotamia, creating a Babylonian empire and becoming the sixth king of its capitol city, Babylon. During his reign, Hammurabi established law and order and funded irrigation, defense, and religious projects. He personally took care of and governed the administration. In fact, in 1784 B.C.E he wrote two hundred eighty-two laws governing family, criminal punishment, civil law, ethics, business, prices, trade, and every other aspect of ancient life—this set of laws became known as “The Code of Hammurabi.” Carved upon a black stele (Doc A.) eight feet high where everyone could read them, based off these two hundred eighty two laws, I believe Hammurabi’s Code was not just based off three simple aspects, justice for the accused, justice for the victims, and justice for the people of society.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia PERSIAN CHART

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hammurabi also established a set of laws that is today called the Code of Hammurabi. This was a system of harsh laws divided into groupings such as slavery, trade, and household laws. An example of his laws are: If a son should strike his father, his hands shall be cut off.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This code was carved on a monumental stone for all to see. In doing this, the entire population would be able to know for sure what is expected of them and what the punishments would be if these codes were broken. We also see this same concept stated in the Jewish Torah which came into being about 700 years later then the code of Hammurabi. From the book of Exodus, chapter 21 line 23, “But if any harm follow, thou shalt give life for life, Eye for Eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.” (mechon-mamre) This excerpt is stating the same concept almost identical to that of Babylon’s Hammurabi. It is also placed in full public view because of the fact that it is the key point of the Jewish lifestyle. When comparing these two texts it would seem that the Jewish Torah has built from the Hammurabi’s code and elaborated it into parts of their religious teachings and their way of…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the most part in the modern world, all people are thought to be created and therefore treated equally. It is instinctual for humans to act in a moral way towards others, and the law in theory protects innocent people from crime and civil injustice. But in ancient Babylonia these standards of society were not present. Hammurabi’s Code, was not in correlation with the modern sense of morality. There is a distinct difference between what is right, and what is the law. But because the government has authority over its citizens, then most people will feel an obligation to act in accordance with whoever it is in the position of authority. A very prevalent theme in Hammurabi’s Code is that of “An eye for an eye,” or the concept that if someone causes harm to another person, then the perpetrator should receive an equal punishment. In the case of a robbery or a minor crime, this concept would seem reasonable. But there are many instances where this idea becomes immoral. For example, if a man’s house collapses and then kills him, the builder or architect of the house would be sent to death as well. Hammurabi’s code does not account for coincidences or mistakes.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi was ruler of the Babylonian dynasty from 1792-1750 B.C. And is responsible for one of the earliest legal codes in history The Laws. The Laws is a form of constitution, an organized code of social rules, rights of people and legal standards. Hammurabi felt that he was a sort of instrument of the gods and that it was his role to implement The Laws as a form of righteous justice with a divine authority. The underlying principle for The Laws is an “eye for an eye” having cause and effect for physical actions and moral situations while setting economic standards. A good example of The Laws having a cause and effect while setting an economic standard is stated “If a man gives to another silver, gold or anything else on deposit in the presence of witnesses and the latter disputes with him or denies it, they shall call that man to account and he shall double whatever he has disputed and repay it.” It sets a standard for putting a deposit down and also sets an effect should one of the parties try to lie about that deposit. The Laws was ahead of its time in many aspects however slavery is legal therefore everyone is not seen as equal. Even if the penalties were not carried out The Laws would have worked as a threating devices letting the people of the land know of the potential consequences of the actions. Unlike Hammurabi’s code the Ten Commandments list guidelines on worship and holy days. And offers worship as a form of retribution instead of the real literal form of physical retribution found in Hammurabi’s code. One example of a law that is similar, deals in financial matters and states “If a man delivers to his neighbor money or goods to keep and it is stolen out of the man’s house. If the thief is found he shall pay double. If the thief is not found the owner of the house shall come near to God, to show whether or not he has put his hand to his neighbor’s goods.” This is very similar to a law found in Hammurabi’s code in which the repayment amount is…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The foundations of current laws and security practices are found in history. The Code of Hammurabi, (1750 B.C.) was created by King Hammurabi in Babylonia. It was established with 282 clauses regulating marriage, slavery, commerce, debt, and theft. Punishment for offenders was considered barbaric. In 621 B.C. a Greek man named Draco wrote Draco’s Law. These were the first written laws in Greece. Punishment for crimes was unreasonable and many were sentenced to death. The word Draconian is a term used to describe unreasonable law.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays