Preview

Leaders America And Guns Rhetorical Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1178 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leaders America And Guns Rhetorical Analysis
Analytical Documented Essay
According to the article, “Leaders: America and Guns,” it is evident that gun control has proven ineffective when it comes to dissolving the “love affair” that exists between Americans and their guns (“Leaders: America and Guns”). This article highlights the issues that permeate throughout America regarding pro gun groups. Not only is this article persuasive, it infuses a degree of rhetorical strategies including logical, as well as emotional appeals to fortify the issue at hand. Various examples, statistics, and sound evidence is brought to the table, adequately arguing and developing the position that, “Americans want to keep their guns, no matter how high the price,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). Furthermore, the other article, “Support for Gun Control Legislation,”
…show more content…
The author included numerous rhetorical strategies to reinforce his rather shocking stance that Americans love their guns and that those guns are here to stay. The authors use of visual descriptions, incidents, and statistics were all appropriate examples used to establish and display the ideas effectively. The composition of the article flows really well, a lot of information is presented but also condensed, mentioning only what is vital to the argument. The author is direct and to the point and the author does not deviate from the main argument, constantly coming back and endorsing his/her opinion. The author mentions, “many Americans have already come to the remarkable conclusion that the best route to a safer America is a better-armed America,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). The author is constantly on point with his/her information. These statements are so stark and bold; they definitely resonate with the audience. An abundance of research and emotionally charged writing made this article a solid and convincing piece for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Leonard Pitts’ article “We Fail Our Children As More Succumb To Guns Every Day” Pitts states his argumentation on ongoing gun fatalities such as, deaths of babies, young children, and young adults. Although he presents his points and opinions, Leonard Pitts’ failed to prove his point and conclude his argument on guns being the problem of our nation.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While comparing the two articles ‘The Case for Banning Guns’ and ‘The Case Against Banning Guns’ the one that makes the most sense and is the most logical is the latter choice. While both sides made realistic arguments, the author, Paul Waldman, choice of words point the reader to believe that he realizes his view is unobtainable. Throughout the second article, the author, Shiha Dalmia, had many valid points, including the example used to reiterate her point about the fact that the biggest mass murders in America in the entire last century have been done without the use of guns.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control laws have been discussed more and more now due to more recent tragedies because of gun violence. James Q. Wilson, previous a professor of Pepperdine University, UCLA, and an author of many public policy books, wrote and editorial letter trying to convince his intended audience that if the government passes more gun control laws it will not decrease the gun violence in America as much as society wants to believe it will. The LA Times published this editorial in 2007 and it is still a good resource.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip” was published in the New York Times as a powerful rhetorical analysis that persuades the audience that gun control does not mean…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Among every one of them, in any case, wrangle over weapon control has been common for so long, it is something numerous individuals can without much of a stretch set their sights on. It is an issue everyone should have a feeling on, as it is immeasurably essential, possibly debilitating, and very present in advanced society. Numerous locate the insignificant idea of weapon control intrusive to their sacred rights while others see an absence of firearm control to be astonishingly unsafe. An author describes, “Organizations like Gun Owners of America and Guns Save Lives also subscribe to the belief (a gun lobby article of faith) that society would benefit if every American carried a concealed handgun all the time” (Greif par. 4). Assurance of oneself and their rights could conceivably be more critical than many lives lost possibly because of genuinely unhindered firearm possession. The simple inquiry would convey numerous to ear-shattering open deliberation, and all things considered. Shouts of sacred disregard and of humanistic laziness would likely be heard miles away. This open deliberation would be particularly on target, however, as there are numerous substantial focuses from either side or it is a subject that must be thoroughly considered…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over Gun control and our second amendment which allows individuals the right to bear arms, has been a very hot topic for the past few years. With the break out of terrorist attacks and massacre shootings across America, this topic has really stirred up some heated debates and divided the American people. Such is the case in the article written by Kirk Johnson on a debate which took place in the state of Oregon between Governor Kate Brown and Sheriff John Hanlin, over gun control laws. Below you will find my analysis on Johnson’s article, examining his methods to inform the readers on such a hot and debatable topic.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Molly Ivins writes an argumentative essay upon the controversial topic of guns. She begins her argument that she is in fact not antigun, but believes other forms of protection such as knives and martial arts are more practical for self defense. She supports her argument with the second amendment in the Constitution by breaking it down word for word and its literal meaning. Ivins goes into everyday life and how many people misconstrued the meaning of the second amendment and its correlation to gun use. Finalizing her argument, states her idea that guns should be regulated with strict policies.…

    • 270 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Formal

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    II. Finals remarks: The time is at hand for Americans to stand and defend their Second Amendment rights, and make liberal, anti-gun politicians aware that gun control has no place in…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These three essays on the topic of gun control, “Both Sides Have Something to Fear” by David Ropeik, “We Can Ratchet Down the Passions” by Adam Winkler, and “A Divide Widened by Misunderstanding” by David Kopel, have many similarities in their views and opinions of the gun debate; i.e. to have gun rights or gun control. Not only their viewpoints, or lack thereof rather, but their timing from when these essays were written and their use of emotional ethos to grab the audience’s attention are all very similar. There also are a lot of differences between these three essays, such as who is in charge of the debate, and what caused the debate in the first place.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control has been a much-debated topic since the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791. In the Constitution it states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Murphy, p. 1656). Although we have a split opinion on whether or not guns should be regulated we can argue that gun regulation hasn’t had a steady increase or decline. Factors such as violence, lobbyist, and Constitutional rights have had both positive and negative impacts on gun regulation.…

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion, the debate over gun control still continues to be a hot issue at least in the next few years. Whether people support it or not, the main method that the government should do now is to tighten the law stricter in order to provide a safety society for every citizens. It is certain that in our lifetime we will see significant changes in the current policy dealing with the possession of firearms. It is important that we pay close attention to this debate seeing as how it will have a great impact on our lives. We’d better act now or never have a chance to make…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans seem to have a love for guns. In the United States gun ownership and gun control are huge political and social issues. Although there are many Americans that would argue that guns ownership is wrong and that there should be stricter gun control laws in the country, there are many more that believe the opposite to be true. The United States, with less than 5 percent of the world’s population, has about 35–50 percent of the world’s civilian-owned guns, according to a report by the Switzerland-based Small Arms Survey, it ranks number one in firearms per capita. The United States also has the highest homicide-by-firearm rate among the world’s most developed nations (Masters). If this is true, then why the fascination for guns in the…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, it is obvious that this problem is big and sophisticated., In the United State gun control one is the most debating topic, but lacks any change or solution that can stop the violence. At this time President Barack Obama present the strategy to solve this issue. Obama’s pathos was really effective because of using the emotional words and stories that happened to innocent people in America. The logos were perfect because President Obama provided accurate, relevant, sufficient and strong evidences. This ethos can convince people and change their opinion. In addition, the ethos is very helpful and convincing because President Barack Obama is democratic and he support gun control, but he worked with John McCain for the republican…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is thought to be a human right for citizens to bear arms, but how do we control gun violence? Nicholas D. Kristof’s article “Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?” explains current complications having to do with gun regulations in the United States. Kristof focuses on school shootings and the high percentage in which they occur nationwide. Kristof making it clear that society seems to turn their heads away from the idea of regulating guns. Attempting to persuade his audience, Kristof utilizes a number of rhetorical strategies to effectively capture the audiences attention and persuade them into taking a positive stance on his beliefs. Initially Kristof fails to present sufficient and credible support, which is needed to support his opinion and create an appealing argument. On the one, hand Kristof used rhetorical strategies that allowed the audience to feel connected and understand the issue; one the other hand but he lacked support disallowing a strong and effective argument.…

    • 777 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays