Preview

Leadership and Management

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leadership and Management
Unit 2.3 Leadership and Management
Vocabulary

Leader: Person or thing that holds a dominant or superior position within its field, and is able to exercise a high degree of control or influence over others. See also leadership.
Bureaucratic Leadership: Style of leadership that emphasizes procedures and historical methods regardless of their usefulness in changing environments. Bureaucratic leaders attempt to solve problems by adding layers of control, and their power comes from controlling the flow of information.
Contingency Leadership: Contingency theory inadvertently assumes that styles are behaviours that cannot be influenced or modified. It is contradictory to “situational-leadership” which stressed the need for leaders to adapt to the situation Manager: An individual who is in charge of a certain group of tasks, or a certain subset of a company. A manager often has a staff of people who report to him or her. As an example, a restaurant will often have a front-of-house manager who helps the patrons, and supervises the hosts. In addition, a specific office project can have a manager, known simply as the project manager.
Democratic Leadership: Involves a team guided by a leader where all individuals are involved in the decision-making process to determine what needs to be done and how it should be done. The group's leader has the authority to make the final decision of the group.
Trait Theory: The measurement of consistent patterns of habit in an individual's behaviour, thoughts, and emotions. The theory is based on the stability of traits over time, how they differ from other individuals, and how the will influence human behaviour.
Autocratic Leadership: A form of government that is run by a single, self-appointed leader (called an autocrat) as opposed to a group of leaders or elected officials.
Laissez-faire Leadership: Non-authoritarian leadership style. Laissez faire (French for, allow to pass or let go) leaders try to give least possible

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Directive leadership- With this type of leadership a leader must explain the tasks and goals to the followers. This style is mostly…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MGT 521 Week 4

    • 2242 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Which of the following describes the leadership style in which a leader tends to centralize authority, dictate work methods, make unilateral decisions, and limit employee participation?…

    • 2242 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Autocratic leadership has benefits in some circumstances where a leader needs to take sole control of a situation with no one causing any distractions from the task in hand to enable the quick and efficient completion of…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An authoritarian leadership is when a leader tells you what they want you to do and you have to do it there and then without arguing. For example, in the Army when you are fighting on the front line and the sergeant tells you to get down you have to so that you don’t get shot.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spmt Review

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some of the leadership styles studied in this program are: autocratic, democratic, laissez-faire, charismatic, transformational, transactional, symbolic, contingency, and situational.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By understanding leadership styles will help develop a person into being an effective leader. We will describe the author’s leadership style model and also look into the strengths and weaknesses of that model. Then compare and contrast leadership theories applicable to the author’s leadership approach. Leadership has different characteristics and behaviors then management…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article in relation to the Multifactor Leadership Theory, it is stated that laissez-faire leaders do not interact with their followers (Hargis, Watt, & Piotrowski, 2011). It further states that they avoid having to make a decision and fail to take an interest in the growth of their area (Hargis, Watt, & Piotrowski,…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Everyone knows about Pearl Harbor. But we never look at the Japanese point of view. Japan had many reasons to attack America. In the 1920’s Japan’s population boomed. They had so many babies, the limited resources of food and oil in Japan couldn’t meet everyone’s needs.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Laissez-faire leadership is not ideal in situations where group members lack the knowledge or experience they need to complete tasks and make decisions. Some people are not good at setting their own deadlines, managing their own projects and solving problems on their own. In such situations, projects can go off-track and deadlines can be missed when team members do not get enough guidance or feedback from leaders.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The laissez faire leader more of an independent off hands approach. This style is only used if the leader has…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a multitude of differences between the House of Representatives and the Senate. Generally, the House of Representatives defines rules through committees, and the Senate’s rules are extremely archaic. The senate is unique legislative body due to the rules that define how debate takes place on the floor. In fact, modern day senators can hold up debate simply by saying they wish to filibuster; they are no longer must stand and talk for hours on end. The House, on the other hand, has a specified Rules Committee and forbids extended debate on legislation on the floor.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    AUTHORITARIAN: This style is also know as Autocratic Leadership, it is a dictatorial method of leading, low concern for followers and high emphasis on task, typically reinforced with threat, punishment, and often ruthless exploitation of workers, who have little or no freedom to resist or desert. This style is used when the leader dictates policies and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and controls all activities without any meaningful participation by the employees.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are a range of leadership styles that can be adopted by organisations in order to try to achieve their goals. Each of these is often suited to certain situations and has drawbacks preventing any one style being the best style of leadership for all situations.…

    • 4107 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership is described as a person that influences a group of people towards the success of a goal (Wong, 2007). Source (2015) describes leadership as a process of influence which can enlist the aid and support of others to accomplish a task. Cherry (2006), advocates that leadership styles describe characteristic behaviors, motivation, and managing a group of people. The following are three of the most prominent leadership styles used today: Authoritarian (Autocratic) provides clear expectations; Participative (Democratic) offers guidance to group members; and Delegative (Laissez-Faire) unable to work independently.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essays

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An example of a autocratic leader is Mark Zuckerberg. As the inventor and co founder of Facebook he needs to be an autocratic leader because he needs to make his own decisions and be able to figure out what is best for the company without the help, guidance and persuasions of others. He is required to make important decisions quickly as the decisions may affect or influence the success of the company greatly. He is someone that employees and users depend on to make the right and best choice for the company and network. Yet he can be the exact opposite and not important to others. Therefore he is a strong and independent leader that makes decisions without the reference of others.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics