Preview

Lecture 1 Torts Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
821 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lecture 1 Torts Law
I. DEFINITION: A tort is a civil wrong beyond a breach of contract for which the law provides redress.
A. The law of torts focuses on private right of redress. The aggrieved party sues in tort to recover damages for the harm caused by her defendant. Contrast this to criminal law where the State, through government-employed prosecutors, pursues the action and extracts the punishment.

B. LAWS come from 3 sources:
i. Constitution ii. Statutory Law iii. Jurisprudential (or common law)

TORT LAW comes primarily from what type of law? Jurisprudential

C. These tortuous wrongs can take various forms:
i. Personal injury or death ii. Harm to property iii. Interference with other protectable interests such as the right to be free from unwarranted invasions of privacy.

II. Samples
A. The plaintiff, Betty England, was employed by S&M Foods, Inc. at its Dairy Queen restaurant in Tallulah, Louisiana when the incident occurred. Larry Garley was the manager of this restaurant. Garley became upset when several hamburgers were incorrectly prepared resulting in them being returned by the customer who had ordered them. Garley allegedly expressed his satisfaction by using profane language and throwing a hamburger which hit plaintiff on the leg.
Intentional Tort

B. This suit arose from the unfortunate events of Halloween night in 1981. Jeffrey Scott Trammel, aged 15, Robert Martin Landry, Jr. aged 133, and Daniel Breaux, aged 13, went trick-or-treating that evening. About 6:30 p.m., Trammel and Breaux rang Robert Bouton’s (plaintiff) front door bell while Landry waited at the sidewalk. Plaintiff opened the door and saw Breaux standing before him. Breaux was dressed military fatigues and was holding a plastic model submachine gun. Plaintiff shut the door immediately and locked it, then armed himself with a 357 magnum pistol. He returned to the door, opened it, and saw a flash of light, caused, he alleges by Trammel’s triggering a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citation- Legal Brief

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: The appellant, Michael P. Babine brought suit against Gilley’s Bronco Shop, Inc. damages from injuries sustained at Kevin’s West, Inc. a nightclub, where he was thrown off the mechanical bull “El Toro”. The mechanical bull was sold to Kevin’s from Gilley’s. Gilley’s purchased it from another party. The purpose of the mechanical bull was for training rodeo cowboys.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.…

    • 9301 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TORTS Final Exam Outline

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages

    • In order to determine if a child is behaving negligently, a child must conform to what a reasonable person of like, age, intelligence, and experience under like circumstances.…

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evaluate and discuss the potential liability (negligence or other torts) of the various parties in the scenario involving but not limited to Bobby, ACE Sports, the nurse, the surgeon and City General. (Avoid simply restating the facts/scenario. Incorporate them into your discussion.)…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Tort Law

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tort system was created to summarize compensation methods and amounts for wrongs and harms committed by one party to another. Tort law, in essence, aims to offer the damaged party a chance to restore their state back to its point of origin; in other words, the point of tort law is to place a financial obligation on an individual who causes harm to another party. The decision to put a cap on damages is not just harmful, but also makes it very difficult to seek lawful judgment in the court of law. Here is few issues show ultimately why putting a cap on damages is not a desirable measure in resolving problems contained within the tort law.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Law

    • 5205 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Over the past several years the body of laws governing compensation in tort law has substantially transformed from its common law origins. In the course of what many have advocated in the name of "tort reform," more than half of the United States have revised, or attempted to revise, one or more aspects of tort liability and damage principles to a greater or lesser degree. Tort law is, of course, constantly evolving; everyday in courts across the country, judges, attorneys and jurors are making and reshaping the law. Despite efforts for reform, one still cannot overlook the nature of modern torts and fail to see a convoluted system of rules and laws that has seized the efficiency, fairness and original purpose of tort law.…

    • 5205 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pathology In Primary Care

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A tort consists of a wrongful acts or injury that leads to physical, emotional, or financial damage to a person in which another person could be held legally responsible.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personal Injury

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is any wrongdoing any wrongdoing to a person or their material goods for which a claim for damages may be made. The wrongdoing is the source of a lawful claim. At the same time as a tort includes injury to material goods, a personal injury tort just connects closely with bodily or emotionally injury to anyone. Personal injury legal suits, as in opposition to illegal proceedings which are started by the government, are social legal suits brought by particular person against other one, business, company, or the government department. A few torts are also liable to be punished by criminal offense, but tort law only determines legal means to recover a right. A state's general law and statutory law bring tort claims into conformity with regulations.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Law: Tort Law

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort laws are laws that usually involve state law and civil suits. State law are based on the legal premise that individuals are liable for the consequences of their conduct if it results in injury to others while civil suits are actions brought to protect an individual 's private rights. A body of rights, obligations, and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others (Tort Law, 2013). There are three elements in every tort action. For the first, the plaintiff must show that the defendant was under a legal duty to act in a certain fashion. Second, the plaintiff must show that the defendant failed to perform his or her duty. The…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torts Outline

    • 9554 Words
    • 39 Pages

    a. A tort is a civil wrong, other than a breach of contract, for which the law provides a legal remedy.…

    • 9554 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    China S Tort Law

    • 2357 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Tort Law has divided into two parts: One is the ‘general principles’ of tort, the other is the ‘specific types’ of torts of 7 sorts.…

    • 2357 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Case: Mcdonalds

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tort law is defined as a body of rights which are applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others. Since businesses have high amounts of money which can provide them with multiple lawyers, it makes it almost impossible for an average customer to not only defeat but even have a fair fight in court. Tort law protects the customer’s best interest and provides them the highest level of justice in these types of cases. Although tort law does give greedy people a loophole to bring up frivolous cases and receive unnecessary compensation, overall the general idea is good.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torts CAN

    • 21577 Words
    • 87 Pages

    (2) FedCA in Ruby (2000) suggests s.7 may provide right to informational privacy –right to control access to personal info, on basis such control is vital for individual decision making and liberty.…

    • 21577 Words
    • 87 Pages
    Powerful Essays