Kevin Keays had been employed with Honda Canada for 14 years when he was fired. During his employment, Keays was diagnosed with choric fatigue syndrome and was granted disability leave for about two years. After the two years Keays returned to work, however Honda became concerned when Keays was continuously absent. Honda requested Keays visit with the organizations occupational medicine specialist to further diagnose his condition. Keays refused to abide with Hondas request and sought legal guidance at which point Honda terminated his employment.…
Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…
Facts: In 1998, the investigative reporting husband and wife team, Jane Akre and Steve Wilson, filed suit against their employer New World Communications of Tampa, Inc. (WVTV), a subsidiary of Fox TV, stating they violated the Florida’s whistleblower statues. They argued that WVTV terminated their employment under the grounds of retaliation after they refused to suppress and distort the contents of a story regarding the controversial Bovine Growth Hormone in Florida’s cattle. They also brought forth additional claims of declaratory relief and breach of contract. After a four week jury trial they found against Wilson and all of his claims. Akre dropped allegations concerning declaratory relief and the court allowed the whistle-blower claims to be moved forward. Akre won a monetary award from the jury of $425,000 based on the retaliation charges established by the whistle-blower statue.…
Dayton Hudson Department Store Company versus United Automobile Workers (UAW) and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)…
General Motors will pay $900 million to a criminal charge that is from the flawed ignition that has caused at least 124 deaths. The problem with the ignition is that it could shut off the car, which disables the airbags, steering, and power brakes. With this flaw it puts drives and anyone in the vehicle at risk. General Motors employees have been aware of this issue for almost 10 years before the recall. It is not illegal to sell a car that has an issue with it. The reason the company is being charged is for not reporting and stating that it has an issue.…
The Griggs v. Duke Power Company was a landmark case regarding discrimination in the workplace. Duke Power Company was known for discriminating against blacks during the hiring process by only allowing them to work in it’s labor department which was the lowest paying position. After the Civil Rights Act was passed, obviously the company was no longer allowed to discriminate legally based on race. However, the company became sneaky and required a high school diploma for employment. This, in turn eliminated a lot of potential black employees because a majority of them did not have high school diplomas. This really became an issue when Griggs applied for a position, but it was denied because he did not…
2. In March of 1998, Ledbetter submitted a questionnaire to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging sex discrimination against her employer. In July of 1998, she filed a formal EEOC charge against the company.…
In the case of Auto Workers V. Johnson Controls, the Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against Johnson Control in federal district courts over illegal sex discrimination under Title VII. The district court entered a summary judgment for Johnson Controls. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, leading the plaintiff to then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. J. Blackmun delivered the opinion of the court in which Marshall, Stevens, O’Connor, and Souter joined. J. White filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment, in which Rehnquist and Kennedy joined. J. Scalia filed an opinion concurring in judgment. Case was decided in March 20, 1991.…
Assume this case happened at a place you have worked in the past, or where you work now (or want to work.) Give an example of how the decision in the case above could lead to better or worse employee relations in your company.…
The plaintiff, Elaine, has sued the defendant, Jerry, because the defendant fired her after the plaintiff was on the job for two months. The job offer letter that the defendant had sent her mentioned the great career opportunities at the company and stated that her annual salary would be $30,000. The company is an employment-at-will employer. The plaintiff was given no reason for the termination. After the termination, the defendant hired a man named Kramer, who had less job experience and education than the plaintiff, for the position. The plaintiff is suing to get her job back. Based upon the readings and the case the legal issues that are raised are: Did the defendant (Jerry) act ethically in this case? Was the plaintiff wrongfully terminated? And did the defendant engage in sexual discrimination, which is a violation of the Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act?…
The purpose of this case study is to justify the fairness of the court settlement between the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Burlington Northern Railroad & Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF). Burlington Northern did willingly and knowingly breach employee personal privacy, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) in conducting unauthorized genetic blood testing on unknowing employees. The court mandate that they pay $2.2 million to 36 employees is fair and just. To illustrate the fairness of the settlement, I will show the utilitarian perspective from Burlington Northern Railway offices as well as the employees’ view. I will also show the deontological considerations by outlining the contractual violation by the company.…
1. Beief description of the situation.Christina Elwell was the national sales director for Google in 2003. In April 2004 she informed her supervisor, Timothy Armstrong, that she bad become pregneat with quadruplets. By May she felt she was being discriminated against and filed a lawsuit with the US district court in New York. She felt this way due to the following instances:According to the lawsuit Armstrong was concerned about Elwells ability to travel due to the complications with the pregnancy. That May he allegedly showed Elwell an organizational chart where her position was deleted. He then asked her to accept another position in the operations department. Elwell…
On January 5, Mrs. Bennett started working at Rikards-Hayley, an investment banking firm located at 121 Centre St., New York, New York. Her first job was in training and development, where she received nothing but superior evaluation from her supervisors. At precisely two years ago, she was promoted to acting manager of the department. As acting manager she received superior evaluation. Five months into the job Mrs. Bennett was notified that the company was going to fill the manager position and she applied for the position. She was told by her supervisor, Darren Blackwood, that management liked her but she did not quite fit the image they were seeking. She needed to lose weight and change her attitude towards he male employees. She was told that she was “too assertive.” Mrs. Bennett was not hired as manager; instead the company hired Martina Yardley. After Mrs. Yardley was hired, Mrs. Bennett claimed she was made miserable. Yardley criticized her work constantly and also made comments about her appearance. Two months ago Mrs. Bennett was fired. When male employees were terminated from Rikards-Hayley, they commonly receive severance package consisting of one year’s salary; Bennett’s severance package contained on six months’ salary. As a result of her treatment at work, Bennett claims she suffered physically and emotionally. To date her medical bills have totaled $2500. She has also been unable to find work; she earned $150,000 before she was terminated.…
The story begins at a local Wal-Mart super center, its Friday, payday. As employees open their paychecks they are awaiting their annual raise. As one employee, Sue opens up her paycheck she finds she has not yet received a raise; she has waited all year for this raise. She is very sad to find she did not receive one, she begins to think maybe she did something wrong. She starts to think back through the year, and can not seem to come up with any solutions as to why she did not receive one. She really felt she worked especially hard that year in hopes to receive a good raise and really felt she deserved to be recognized for it. In the break room she overhears John, her follow co-worker, bragging to their colleague 's about his second raise. Now John is making $1.25 more per hour than her even though they both have been working at Wal-Mart for two years. They both have the same job descriptions and titles so there should not be differences in their pay. Sue can not quite understand why he received two when she only received one. She has seen him numerous times being tardy for work or calling in sick. She knows she is a better worker and is more efficient. Sue recently took a human resource class at Buffalo State College and she remembers learning about a law regarding equal pay. She can 't seem to recall the specifics, so she is determined to look into it further and fix the problem.…
Horne was appointed Managing Director Gilford Motor Co 6-year term. He appointed by a written agreement says he will not solicit customers for their own purposes and whether he is a general manager or after he left. In order to avoid the effect of the agreement, Horne left Gilford Motor Co. and started his own company. Johnson's company provides car accessories of Gilford Motor Co’s car in a weaken price and the shareholder of Gilford Motor being his associate in his own company. Horne has been a violation of his agreement with Gilford Motor, so he started a new company. Gilford Motor Co prosecute violations of the labor contract, Horne believes that the company has a separate legal identity. The operation of…