Preview

Ledbetter V. Goodyear Case Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Case Summary
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007
550 U.S. 618 (2007)
Alito, Justice This is an employment discrimination case that was held by the Supreme Court of the United States. District Court found in favor of the Plaintiff awarding back pay and damages. Goodyear Appealed. The issue argued in the Supreme Court claimed all damages void before Sept. 1997 due to statute of limitations placed on discriminatory claims. The court found in favor of the Defendant, Goodyear, and decision was reversed. Facts. Plaintiff Lilly Ledbetter was hired at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in 1979. This factory was located in Gadsden, Alabama. The factory based the decision for raises on supervisor evaluations and recommendations on worker performance. In November 1998 Ledbetter filed suit claiming pay discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963. Ledbetter was making almost $1,500 less a month then the average male employee in the same position.
…show more content…
The Plaintiff filed suit against Goodyear Tire after the statutory limitations period of 180 days set forth by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, the plaintiff argued that filing suit within the period of 180 days was not possible due to the inability of discovering the discrimination earlier. Rule. The rules used by the court to resolve this matter was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Equal Pay Act of 1963. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employers cannot be sued over race or pay discrimination if the claims are after 180 days passed. The Equal Pay Act of 1963 abolished pay wage consideration based on sex. Analysis. The court found for the Civil Rights Act stating that Ledbetter should have filed suit against Goodyear when the rejection of pay decision occurred. Since 180 days had elapsed the suit violated the statute of limitations for discriminatory

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: The Plaintiff Zelma Mitchell was terminated on June 4, 1974, for alleged misconduct from the Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits on June 12, 1974, she was denied these benefits finding that Mitchells act were constituted as misconduct. Being denied disqualified her for…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Wittenburg v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. (AEFA), Bonnie Wittenburg was an employee for AEFA in their Minneapolis office. The plaintiff was hired by the company in November of 1998 at the age of forty-six to serve as an Equity Research Analyst in AEFA's Equity Investment Department. During a reduction in force by the defendant in 2003, the plaintiff was terminated. In January of 2004, the plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received her Notice of Right to Sue on January 30, 2004. The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender. AEFA moved for a summary judgment.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Ms. Deters, the plaintiff, sued Equifax, the defendant, in the United States District Court for the district of Kansas after being sexually harassed on several different occasions by three different co-workers and also the original male supervisor. Violating Title VII, prohibiting discrimination of employees based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. Ms. Deters filed multiple complaints on the daily sexual harassment that had taken place at the office. Mr. Taylor indicated he would handle the sexual harassment, him being the highest managerial position in the office. Mr. Taylor was also designated by Equifax to enact its human resource policies. The courts entry of judgment in the favor of the employee denied the defendants motion on the issue of punitive damages. However, Equifax did not agree with the decision of the court and wanted a judgment as a mater of law de novo. Equifax litigates that the evidence was not in support of the punitive damages.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    2006: Lilly Ledbetter loses to Goodyear in a supreme court and gets a bill from Goodyear of $3,165 for "court costs."…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This case analysis will covers the impact of the McKennon V. Nashville Banner Publishing Co Supreme Court Of The United States Decision in any legal dispute regulated by Age Discrimination In Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) and others regulation that covers the elimination of discrimination in the workplace, the contribution to payback calculation procedure in this type of legal suit, as well as impact in the workplace environment. The Court held in McKennon established that the employer is liable for its discriminatory actions even where it subsequently discovers evidence that would have led to the adverse action on lawful and legitimate grounds.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. In March of 1998, Ledbetter submitted a questionnaire to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging sex discrimination against her employer. In July of 1998, she filed a formal EEOC charge against the company.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In every case involving a minority defendant, it is a good policy to insure that no discrimination was involved at any point. The evidence is just too strong that, even in the 21st century discrimination is still present in our justice system. However, while it is obvious that must be an issue in some cases almost all the evidence in this case points to the defendants…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Auto Workers V. Johnson Controls, the Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against Johnson Control in federal district courts over illegal sex discrimination under Title VII. The district court entered a summary judgment for Johnson Controls. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, leading the plaintiff to then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. J. Blackmun delivered the opinion of the court in which Marshall, Stevens, O’Connor, and Souter joined. J. White filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment, in which Rehnquist and Kennedy joined. J. Scalia filed an opinion concurring in judgment. Case was decided in March 20, 1991.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vaughn Case Brief

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Plaintiff-Appellant Emma S. Vaughn contests the judgment rendered in favor of defendant Texaco, Inc., dismissing with prejudice Vaughn's race and sex discrimination suit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Because the magistrate clearly erred in finding no racial discrimination, we reverse.…

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    B. United Steelworkers of America vs. Weber (1979) Weber worked for kaiser aluminum who was under united steelworkers of merica-set up special training program for minorities-weber wanted to get in but couldn't filed using 1964 Civil Rights Act title 7-ruled in favor of court because making up for past…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 2 and 10

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages

    | expanded worker 's rights to sue employers on equal-pay issues, starting a six-month clock with each…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rjdt Task 1

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    claim against the company under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this case, the…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In January 2001, Kathryn Brennan sued her former employer, Bally Total Fitness Corp. ("Bally"), pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., alleging that she was the victim of sexual harassment and disability discrimination. Relying on the fact that Brennan signed an arbitration agreement, Bally moved to dismiss the Complaint and compel arbitration in accordance with Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. §§ 3 and 4.…

    • 3978 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appropriate outcome of this case would be that Walmart violated the right for equal pay and equal promotion due to the way it conducted the promotions and defined payment for its employees. The company as is evident in the plaintiff complaints have been discriminating against women both regarding promotions and payment, violating The Equal Pay Act of 1963, equal employment opportunity act 1963 and the Civil Act of 1964, (Diversity and Managing Diversity,…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The court reversed the intermediate court's judgment and reinstated the administrative law judge's decision that respondent was terminated for racial reasons. The intermediate court erred by rejecting the permissive inference of intentional discrimination as insufficient where the fact finder found the proffered reasons to be a pretext…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays