Legal and Social Paper
Legal & Social Business Paper
The first issue is whether or not Enzo had a valid contract with Gina when she asked him to take possession and care of her car until she returns home from active military duty. As compensation, Gina gave Enzo the right to use the car while in his care and he agreed. It appears that in this case they did have a valid contract. There was a valid offer and acceptance by both parties. There was consideration by both parties for the benefits. The verbal contract was for a lawful purpose and both parties appeared to be adults of sound mind. With this issue of a contract, both parties seem relevant to the four elements for which Enzo will take care of Gina’s car while she is away and until she returns.
The second issue is whether or not Enzo and Gina had a legitimate contract with Time Warner Cable since Enzo would be spending most of his time at Gina’s apartment. In this case Gina and Enzo have a bilateral contract with Time Warner. A bilateral contract is when you have two parties that each makes a promise to do something. In this scenario, Gina and Enzo signed a contract that allowed them to have HD in the apartment for 12 months while they pay Time Warner $50 per month for that service. In conclusion, there is a legal binding between both parties.
The third issue is whether or not Enzo had any right to sell Gina’s car on eBay after she departed for the military. Enzo forged Gina’s signature to allow the car title to go to Mr. Buyer. After the sale, Enzo negotiated the check to Mr. Landlord for rent. After these transactions were done, Gina returned home from the military and now has filed a lawsuit against Enzo and Mr. Buyer. Mr. Buyer now wants his money back and is suing Enzo and Mr. Landlord. There are several issues with these descriptions. First of all, it is illegal for Enzo to forge Gina’s signature. It’s a void-able contract because the law permits one party to terminate the contract due to the unlawful
The first issue is whether or not Enzo had a valid contract with Gina when she asked him to take possession and care of her car until she returns home from active military duty. As compensation, Gina gave Enzo the right to use the car while in his care and he agreed. It appears that in this case they did have a valid contract. There was a valid offer and acceptance by both parties. There was consideration by both parties for the benefits. The verbal contract was for a lawful purpose and both parties appeared to be adults of sound mind. With this issue of a contract, both parties seem relevant to the four elements for which Enzo will take care of Gina’s car while she is away and until she returns.
The second issue is whether or not Enzo and Gina had a legitimate contract with Time Warner Cable since Enzo would be spending most of his time at Gina’s apartment. In this case Gina and Enzo have a bilateral contract with Time Warner. A bilateral contract is when you have two parties that each makes a promise to do something. In this scenario, Gina and Enzo signed a contract that allowed them to have HD in the apartment for 12 months while they pay Time Warner $50 per month for that service. In conclusion, there is a legal binding between both parties.
The third issue is whether or not Enzo had any right to sell Gina’s car on eBay after she departed for the military. Enzo forged Gina’s signature to allow the car title to go to Mr. Buyer. After the sale, Enzo negotiated the check to Mr. Landlord for rent. After these transactions were done, Gina returned home from the military and now has filed a lawsuit against Enzo and Mr. Buyer. Mr. Buyer now wants his money back and is suing Enzo and Mr. Landlord. There are several issues with these descriptions. First of all, it is illegal for Enzo to forge Gina’s signature. It’s a void-able contract because the law permits one party to terminate the contract due to the unlawful