Preview

Legal Case: Unites States V. Leon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Case: Unites States V. Leon
In the legal case (Unites States v Leon) On August 1981, police in Burbank received intel from an informant that Patsy Stewart and Armando Sanchez were selling narcotics from their personal residence. Police began surveillance of their home without a warrant and identified suspects Ricardo Del Castillo and Alberto Leon. Based on their investigation and information obtained from another informant, a warrant was obtained. A search of the residence was conducted, and large amounts of drug paraphernalia were seized. During the preliminary hearing the warrant was found to be invalid due to lack of probable cause. However, the evidence was admissible in court. This case set the precedence for the good faith doctrine.
In my opinion, the warrant was
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Katz V States 389 US 347 Summary
    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page

    Katz V States 389 US 347 Summary

    Katz (the appellant) was convicted under an eight-count indictment, charged with transmitting wagering information by telephone from Los Angeles to Miami and Boston. The evidence, telephone conversations overheard by the FBI agents with an attached electronic listening and recording device, to the phone booth Katz used. The Court of Appeals rejected the contention that the recordings had been obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Davis v.The Board of county Commissioners of Dona Ana CountyCase
    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Davis v.The Board of county Commissioners of Dona Ana CountyCase

    The legal issue in this case of Davis v.The Board of county Commissioners of Dona County was, Plaintiff Jacqueline (Davis) file a case against her employer The Board of County Commissioners of Dona Ana County. On February 27 ,2004 ,Davis [ a paralegal ] filed a lawsuit under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Acts (FLSA ).Claiming her employer failure to pay her for overtime work during lunch time and rest period and for other work exceeding eight hours a day and 40 hours a week as well as denial of rest and meal periods. On August 1, 2002, O’Melveny adopted and binding arbitration of most employment-related claims by and against its employees.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Study
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Study

    -shotguns and rifles could be owned but only if weapons were registered, kept unloaded and dissembled or restricted trigger locks.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Draper V. United States
    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case Study: Draper V. United States

    A graduate from WIU notified the police about a child being beaten. The graduate student then gave the officers the home address of where the reported abuse was coming from. Officer Gung Ho and his partner Nab went to the home they were notified about. Police knocked on the door and Ms. Smith answered. Police explained why they were at her place of residence and Ms. Smith invited the officers in and called for Sam, the child. A man named Joe Thug, and Sam both came out of an upstairs room. Thug started yelling at the police to get out of the house unless they have a warrant. Officers told Thug to remain in the room, but as he did so, Officer Ho noticed what appeared to be “cigarette burns” on Sam’s arms. Officer proceeded upstairs after Joe…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case: US V. Calandra 1974
    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: US V. Calandra 1974

    In the case US v. Calandra (1974), Calandra was being questioned by the federal grand jury about loan sharking business. The reason the jury was asking these question were based on the evidence obtained at his company. Calandra didn’t want to answer any questions because he felt that the search of the company was an unlawful search and that it violated his fourth amendment exclusionary rule. The refusal to answer the grand jury, was what was being question about this case. Calandra felt like because of the exclusionary rule unde0r the fourth amendment he didn’t have to answer but he was wrong. The supreme court held that the exclusionary rule was only applicable in criminal courts and was not meant to be seen as a right but as a way to reduce unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by police ("Oyez: US v. Calandra," n.d.).…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Case: Lemon T. Al. V. Kurtzman 403 US
    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Case: Lemon T. Al. V. Kurtzman 403 US

    It was determined that the plaintiffs failed to show any part of the statute led to a denied admission to any non public school on racial or religious grounds. So the complaint of violating the 14th amendment was not discussed and dismissed for lack of standing.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay Arizona vs. Grant
    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay Arizona vs. Grant

    The case Arizona vs. Grant occured because an event that happened on August 25, 1999 involving two police officers, and a suspect who was believed to be involved in narcotics activity. The officers first visit to the house where the suspect lived was followed by a second visit later that night because he wasnt there at the initial visit. After their first visit they ran a background check and found causes for the arrest of the subject, Rodney Grant. Upon the second return the subject Rodney Grant was apprehended after pulling into his driveway and walking about ten feet towards the officers. After they placed him in the police vehicle, they searched the suspects car, which was the cause of the Arizona vs Grant case, because of a debate on evidence pulled from the car without reasonable reasons to search it. Although there was cocaine and a weapons in the car, the officers didnt have reasons to prove why the searched it after the suspect had already been apprehended and put into the police vehicle. It is because of this that led to questioning of why the car was searched because Grant was not in the nearby vicinity of the vehicle and therefore no harm to the officers unless he had a weapons in his immediate possession.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supreme Court Case: Branzburg V. Hayes
    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page

    Supreme Court Case: Branzburg V. Hayes

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United States Vs Lopez Case Study
    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    United States Vs Lopez Case Study

    The United States v. Lopez case was the first United States Supreme Court case since the early 1930’s to create laws that limit Congress’s power. On March 10th of 1992, Lopez brought a handgun into school. When the police asked him if he did bring it , he didn't lie, he said the " yes I did carry the gun".Not a few days later Lopez was charged with violating federal laws which banned guns on all school properties in the United States. Because of what he did , the federal law came with an act called "Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1990".…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US
    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    On the last of President Adams term he wanted to ensure Federalist took control of the Judiciary branch so he named forty-two justices of the piece and sixteen circuit court justices for Washington DC. Once the commissions were signed by the President Adams the Secretary of State had the commissions sealed however they were not delivered by the end of President Adams term. President Jefferson was the incoming president he chose not to honor the commissions due to them not being submitted in time.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    4rth Amendment
    • 6813 Words
    • 28 Pages

    4rth Amendment

    The case present before us involves the constitutionality of a dog sniff in regards to the 4rth Amendment. The respondent claims that the police officer, a representative of the State of Florida lacked probable cause to search the vehicle. The dog used in the operation, Aldo was not reliable since his detector certification had expired. Also, the officer did not maintain a record of his field performance alerts. As a result, the respondent contends that Aldo’s alert was false thereby diminishing the validity of probable cause. On the other hand, the State of Florida counters by arguing that probable cause is a flexible common sense standard and requires only a fair probability and not hard certainties. Moreover, the officer who had trained with the dog is the best judge of the dog’s credibility as opposed to the Court’s especially since law enforcement agencies act with good faith. Consequently, defense counsel moved to suppress the physical evidence as the product of a warrantless search without probable cause. The trial court denied the motion to suppress but made no findings. The respondent then appealed to the Florida First District Court of Appeal. They affirmed. Harris v. State, 989 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). The Florida Supreme Court quashed the lower court decision. Harris v. State, 71 So. 3d 756 (Fla. 2011). The Court scrutinized the case under the totality of the circumstances test established in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) and concluded that Aldo’s reliability, was not enough to demonstrate probable cause.…

    • 6813 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hollis D. King Case Analysis
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hollis D. King Case Analysis

    Facts: Hollis D. King was arrested after a search of his apartment. Local police department officers had probable cause to force entering and searching King apartment. Incident to search and arrest stemmed from a strong odor of what appeared to be burning illegal narcotics. Prior to entering the apartment, Police Officers knocked on the door and announced their presence. The occupants in the apartments did not respond. Under the suspicion of valuable evidence being destroyed the officers forced entering into the apartment. As the officers entered the apartment the odor of the burning substance became stronger. The smell of the burning substance created the exigent circumstance in the probable cause and the case at trial. Without a warrant,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case: United States Vs. Lopez
    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: United States Vs. Lopez

    The court case, United States v. Lopez, was the first Unites States Supreme Court case in a long time, since the early 1930’s, that confines the power of congress. Which functions the importance of the relationship between the federal government and the states. The National and State government both share similarities in which they create and enforce laws. The United States has been dependent on sharing powers with the Federal government and individual State government. However, many cases have been able to represent the arbitrary to the allocation of powers. This case in particular showed that Congress was way over their power for controlling a public school district.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford (1803)
    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page

    Dred Scott V. Sandford (1803)

    Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)- It showed that black american weren’t able to sue in court.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Dandridge V.
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Case Of Dandridge V.

    When Dandridge met with Preminger, he admitted that he had not considered Dandridge because he thought she was too "ladylike" for the role. In real-life, Dandridge always prided herself on being elegant and conducting herself like a lady. She had gone to the interview with Preminger dressed in a fashionable but plain suit and light makeup. He wanted her to read for the part of Joe's demure sweetheart, Cindy Lou, but Dandridge refused. She pleaded for the opportunity to return the next day and read for Carmen. He reluctantly agreed. The next day Dandridge, decked out in floozy garb, wind-blown hair and heavy makeup showed up late for the interview and shocked Preminger into giving her a screen test. The test was made with actor James Edwards.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More