Preview

Legal Rights During Trial

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Rights During Trial
LEGEL RIGHTS DURING TRIAL

Legal rights during trial are the fundamental principle of fairness in all legal matters, both civil and criminal. All legal procedures set by statute and court practice, including notice of rights, must be followed for each individual so that no prejudicial or unequal treatment will result. The right to an impartial jury: means the defendant, according to the Constitution (Article ш, section 2) and the Bill of Rights (sixth amendment) has the right to be tried by a jury of his/her pears and they must do so unbiased and just. What this means is they must set their own personal feelings aside and judge the defendant on the merits of the law and the evidence presented. It is my opinion that when the “Framers “of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The right to a fair trial. Where does it come from? The 6th Amendment. Which category of defendants were the first to be given this right when accused of a crime by a state? Anyone charged with a capital offense (must be provided an attorney) Which category came next? Anyone charged with a felony (must be provided an attorney) Which criminal defendants still do not have this right? If he or she is not sentenced to actual imprisonment and could not have been sentenced for more than one year.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Impartial juror was “one free from the dominant influence of knowledge acquired outside of the courtroom, free from strong and deep impressions that closes the mind” – Justice John Marshall…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cypop 5 Task 1 Legislation

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * Right to a Fair Trial- You are innocent until proven guilty. If accused of a crime, you have the right to hear the evidence against you, in a court of law. All trials must be fair and impartial.…

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ARGUMENTS: For the petitioners, they argued that adequate counsel before trial for preparation and presentation are rights included in the due process clause. Also because there was no fair, impartial, and deliberate trial, it was a denial of due process. Petitioner’s and their counsel had plenty of time to prepare. Also the trial was fair and impartial and that the extra security for the defendants cannot be taken as the opposite.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Bill of Rights guarantees that everyone has the right to due process. The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark case Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) changed our due process by adding additional procedures to how law enforcement handles a suspect and ensuring they know their rights as American citizens.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The amendment guarantees a “speedy and public” trial with a jury. Defendants are also given the right to be represented by a lawyer, question witnesses, and know if charges are being made against them.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is fair to be tried in both civil and criminal court for the same alleged actions because they deal with different aspects of the crime. For civil cases, it deals with whether you are liable or not, while in criminal cases it's whether your guilty or not. You can be found not guilty in a criminal case, however, you can still be found liable in civil cases. It is only fair that the victims get awarded damages. Furthermore, it is not against the 5th amendment since the defendant won't be at risk of life or limb in civil cases. Moreover, those found guilty in criminal cases are rarely brought against in civil torts. Clearly, there is nothing wrong with being tried in a criminal and civil court for the same crime.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judge at trial should share the same power equal to the jury and altogether come to a…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the trial, the defendant also has the right to know what the nature of the charges are, the right to legal representation, and to face any witnesses for the prosecution. This person also has the right to provide witnesses to support their defense. This Amendment also says that the trial must take place in the state and district where the alleged crime took place. In order to get out of jail, most times a person has to post bail. Bail ensures that the individual will return for their appointed court date.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our legal rights are also outlined in the Bill of Rights. Amendments 5 through 10 express our rights as citizens to speedy trial, reserved powers, and rights of accused persons in criminal proceedings. I also learned the types of fines and charges that can be given to criminals in cases such as domestic violence. Another case that I observed was Michael Baron vs. Maria and Angelica Delgado. Maria and Angelica Delgado were the plaintiffs, which charged Baron with aggravated assault and battery and he was also charged with violating his restraining…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An All-White Jury

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages

    We are told that the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that we have the right to an unbiased jury when it is a felonious trial, but what is considered neutrality? This question has been one that the Supreme Court has asked time and time again, and they have stated “that the jury must be drawn from a representative cross-section of the community” (Taylor v. Louisiana, 1975). In order to “determine unconstitutional exclusion, the court has said that the group must be: A) distinctive B) lacking what they call fair and reasonable representation because of reasons C) caused by the system of jury selection (Duren v. Missouri, 1979). Therefore, this learner thinks the answer to the above question is no. This learner also does not think that African Americans can receive a fair trail with an all-white jury. I know that we all have biases and that even our own color can harbor…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The right to a fair trial – This right does not apply to criminal proceedings but to a broad range of areas where an individual civil rights or responsibilities are decided upon. Examples of relevant issues relating to this would be compensation claims, the complaints procedure of public bodies and appeal procedures in social security, mental health care and treatment tribunals.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trial Process

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The criminal trial process is a vital part of the criminal justice system in NSW as it plays a fundamental role in achieving justice, by determining the innocence or guilt of an offender. Yet, despite the criminal trial process still having many complex issues that remove it of achieving its full means of justice, the process has stood the test of time and lasted for more than two centuries. It aims at lawfully and justly providing victims, offenders and society with the rights of a fair trial. The hierarchies of courts play a crucial role in effectuating justice for the community. The courts jurisdiction is the extent of the court’s authority and is often determined by the hierarchy. The lowest form of court is the Local Court. The Local Court Act 1982 (NSW) outlines the offences that are heard in this court. They are less serious crimes, where matters are tried summarily, but are also the location for bail and committal hearings, where police play a prominent role in achieving justice. The Intermediate and High Courts handle indictable crimes as well as appeals from lower courts. It is in these courts that a decision made sets a doctrine of precedent. The court hierarchy is a major part of the criminal trial process as it allows appeals and precedents to flow easily. It attempts to ensure consistency between judicial decisions, as well as limit the discretion on most judicial verdicts. Appeals and precedents fundamentally ensure efficiency and the effectiveness of achieving justice, but despite them being an effective measure in achieving justice, there are still cheaper and more cost-efficient methods, such as YJC, and Circle Sentencing, that can fulfill the same outcome. The cornerstone of Australia’s criminal trial process is the Adversary System. This refers to the legal procedure where two opposing sides argue a case before an independent, third party eg.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important that citizens have a suitable way of implementing their constitutional rights against the government; those rights may be emphasized both offensively and defensively. For example a person accused of committing a crime has a series of rights which are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and state laws. Therefore, if you have been accused of a crime, just how do you know if your rights have been…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays