The defendant (Smith) won in the lower courts, so the plaintiff (Cooper) appealed the case.…
the purpose of the hearing, to the extent necessary, the petitioner shall have the burden of…
Using the OYEZ.org web site, you can find the PETITIONER & RESPONDENT by clicking on the hypertext link titled “Docket”.The PETITIONER is the party who initiates the court case, the ‘opponent’ is referred to as the RESPONDENT|…
| The litigant who brings charges against an individual, corporation, or government in a civil or criminal court case is called the…
(b) The parties: (1 mark) • • • (c) What are the names of the parties? Who is the ‘appellant’? Who is the ‘respondent’? Please explain why the parties are not referred to as the ‘plaintiff’ and the ‘defendant’?…
| The term used in law to denote the power of a particular court to hear a case and render a binding decision isAnswer…
Appeal upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault on a police officer and criminal use of a firearm in the 2nd degree.…
An appellate court is a court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a court of first instance (trial court)…
1) In Society for the Protection of Unborn Children v Coogan [1989] IR 734 Finlay CJ referred to a litigant who is “an officious or meddlesome intervenient”. Walsh J. stated in “every member of the public has an interest in seeing that the fundamental law of the State is not defeated. The Constitution commits to the judicial organ of government the ultimate guardianship of the Constitution itself and of the vindication of the rights which are either guaranteed by it or conferred by it. But the courts cannot move until their powers are invoked.” (at 743).…
In Huisman and Another v Lakie and Others, the court sets out the requirements for the granting of a special plea of res judicata which are that the dispute must involve the same parties, concern the same relief and the same cause of action.3 This defense originates from Roman Dutch law and is based and founded on public policy which requires that litigation should come to an end when the same matter has already been adjudicated upon in another forum.4These requirements are not cast in stone such that they may be relaxed in the case of a special plea for a court to apply res judicata in the form of issue estoppel. In Huisman’s case, the court averred that those common law requirements are sometimes relaxed to an extent and this development had its genesis in the case of Boshoff v Union Government, in which the ‘same cause of action’ requirement was relaxed to allow for the successful application of res judicata.5 The rule relating to these requirements has been extended in the case of issue estoppel which is a concept received from English law.6 In Smith v Porritt and others, the court asserted that where the circumstances justify the…
The appellant is not appealing the percentage of his estate which Ms Mncora was awarded and is also not appealing the delictual damages for breach of promises which was awarded. (para 3)…
Petitioner-appellant Vicente M. Domingo, now deceased and represented by his heirs, Antonina Raymundo vda. de Domingo, Ricardo, Cesar, Amelia, Vicente Jr., Salvacion, Irene and Joselito, all surnamed Domingo, sought the reversal of the majority decision dated, March 12, 1969 of the Special Division of Five of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the trial court, which sentenced the said Vicente M. Domingo to pay Gregorio M. Domingo P2,307.50 and the intervenor Teofilo P. Purisima P2,607.50 with interest on both amounts from the date of the filing of the complaint, to pay Gregorio Domingo P1,000.00 as moral and exemplary damages and P500.00 as attorney's fees plus costs.…
Facts: In Oct. 13, 1989, Tulfo wrote an article in his column in PDI 'On Target' stating that the Supreme Court rendered an idiotic decision in legalizing checkpoints, and again on Oct. 16, 1989, where he called the Supreme Court stupid and "sangkatutak na mga bobo justices of the Philippine Supreme Court". Tulfo was required to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt. Tulfo said that he was just reacting emotionally because he had been a victim of harassmen in the checkpoints, and "idiotic" meant illogical and unwise, and "bobo" was just quoted from other attorneys, and since the case had been decided and terminated, there was not contempts. Lastly, the article does not pose any clear and present danger to the Supreme court.…
(2) "decree" means the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the Court…
An appeal is a petition for review of a case that has been decided by a court of law. The petition is made to a higher court for the purpose of overturning the lower court's decision.…