The second element of the contract is ¬Intention. For a contract to be considered valid there must be the intent to create a legal relation. The law allows for a distinction between commercial agreements and social or domestic arrangements. The courts can draw a conclusion as to if there was an intent to create legal intention based on the language used in the contract. The case of Rose and Frank Co. v J.R. Crompton and Bros Ltd (1925) a clause within the contract which said that the agreement was not to be a “formal or legal agreement and shall not be subject to legal jurisdiction in the law courts.” Therefore, it was held that this was not a contract because there was not intent to create legal relation.
The third element of a contract is Capacity. If a contract is made by someone that is e.g. under-age or mentally disable, the contract can become voidable. This is because a party is unable to carry out legal relations by law.
The fourth element of a contract is Consideration. Consideration is the element that found that in the case of Rand v Hughes the contract was violable. This is because the contracts must be written under seal and if they are oral consideration must be proven. Consideration is a benefit/detriment relationship between both parties. There are six rules of consideration. Consideration must be real