Preview

Lenin's Brutality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1671 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lenin's Brutality
“Every year, thousands of people flock to the cold and dreary Red Square in Moscow, Russia.” Located there is something remarkably peculiar. In a cold, damp, and dark mausoleum lies Vladimir Lenin’s lifeless, preserved body. Frozen in time because of science, the body has been an attraction to many throughout the decades. While traveling thousands of miles to see the body of a man who was long dead may seem strange, the actions of Lenin makes it stranger. Although he was certainly an influential man, changing the political landscape of Russia forever and creating a global superpower, Lenin has a darker side. While the genocide of his successor, Joseph Stalin, live in infamy, Lenin is often overlooked for his evil. Lenin brutally killed thousands …show more content…

While Lenin rose to power on the ideals of fighting for the people, he committed heinous crimes against anyone who he considered was a threat to his new government. In doing so, Lenin started the Red Terror, a period of time where the new government attempted to find anti- communist or pro- monarchy citizens, often killing or enslaving those that they found. A task force that was known as the Cheka was put in place for that goal. The Cheka, a task force whose name has no formal translation, hunted down citizens who Lenin considered a threat to his regime. As the government had many that opposed the communist government, the police force created terror throughout much of the Russian population. Although the exact numbers of executions and deaths from the Red Terror is not known, some historians think that as many as half a million were killed by the Cheka. Yet, executions were not the only horrors that the Red Terror spread throughout Russia. Many members of opposition parties were sent to labor camps, which would become known in the Western world as concentration camps. The civilians unfortunate enough to be sent there were forced to work in horrendous conditions. Because of the poor working environment, many died in the labor camps. Lenin also essentially abolished Russia’s religious freedom, often persecuting minority groups such as the Orthodox Church, Catholics, …show more content…

Yet most everyone can agree that his impact on Russia was very large, whether for better or for worse. Surprisingly, the place that he is considered as the biggest hero would be in Russia, where his body was preserved and on display in Moscow ever since his death. Many Russians often thought of Lenin as a father figure, even while the rest of the world considered him to be a villain. Back in 2011, there was talk that Russia would remove the body from where it lay in Red Square. This agrees with what a large number of the Russian population thinks, but some think that the body needs to remain where it is. One of these people, Walter Rogers, is a man who writes for the news organization Christian Science Monitor. He argues that “Interring Lenin beside his mother in St. Petersburg may paper over, but will not expunge the bloody Bolshevik past. Shakespeare reminds us that ‘the evil men do lives after them.’ Modern Russia would dishonor communism’s victims if Lenin’s corpse is smuggled out of town on a moonless night (Heilbrunn, 3).” This controversy over where Lenin’s body remains shows how many disagree about how Lenin should be remembered. And while Russia may be struggling to come to terms with who Lenin really was, the rest of the world seems to be more decisive. According to Ellie Zolfagharifard from the UK Daily Mail, a survey found “the opinions of almost 7,000

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Everyone is a product of their circumstance, yet, consequential individuals can shape events within their times. Leon Trotsky, key member of the Russian Bolshevik party in the early 20th century, exemplifies this statement. Born into a period of turbulent change socially and politically, due to the Russian industrial revolution, Trotsky was shaped by his context and events in early life. However, it is to a greater extent that Trotsky was a significant player and shaper of events within his times, being the November revolution of 1917 and the Russian civil war. Yet, as fervor for change lessened, so did Trotsky’s prominence; he was too associated with International Marxism to adapt to the new world.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the reign of Alexander the lll terror and repression has been widely used as a mean of control. Under the Tsar they were not used as much as their successors but they were used especially with Alexander lll with Russification (Okhrana), and the counter reforms also with Nicholas ll (Okhrana) with bloody Sunday. Under the leadership of Lenin repression and terror persisted with the ‘Red Terror’ campaign (war communism) which consisted of mass arrests and executions ordered by the Bolshevik government and implemented by the Cheka. This idea of control through repression and terror continued in Russia under the leadership of Josef Stalin (OGPU, NKVD, NKGB, MGB). After the death of Stalin, Khrushchev implemented a period of ‘de-Stalinisation’ (KGB) with the aim of ridding the state of its secretive and repressive nature to open up and make allies with the west which was the first time since Alexander ll.…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent of a balanced interpretation of Trotsky within history varies throughout the differing aspects of his life and personality, however it can be considered that overall, it offers a balanced interpretation to a limited extent. His position as a Marxist offers a more unbalanced interpretation, as perspectives vary from stating that he was a practical Marxist idealist to perceiving him as a bloodthirsty terrorist. Similarly, interpretations of Trotsky appear unbalanced when considering his role as a propagandist through his oratorical skills and writing, which allowed for him to be viewed as a great Bolshevik figurehead, whilst Soviet Realism effectively eliminated his significance within history, and vilified him. Within his role as Commissar for War, however, offers a more balanced opinion as it is widely regarded both during his time and in more contemporary times that he was incredibly fit for the role, however there are still interpretations that vary from the romanticised notion of Trotsky as War Commissar. Therefore it can be considered that when considering different aspects of his life, the extent of a balanced interpretation varies, however that overall history offers a limited balanced interpretation of Trotsky, as within each segment of his life, there is no real mutual consensus, as differing contexts and agendas behind documenting history aim to colour Trotsky in different ways. Historiography allows for these differing opinions to be recognised as due to the different contexts and agendas behind historians for documenting Trotsky’s history, as history is a humanised process and thus flaws can be evident within the differing interpretations of Trotsky’s character.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lenina is thinking about John when she skipped a fetus' sleeping sickness injection. Later, the results of her mistake is that an Alpha-Minus administrator died of trypanosomiasis. Furthermore, based on the author's tone toward Leninas mistake I can infer that her actions and thoughts are more like those of an individual,…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The brutal methods employed by the Bolsheviks certainly helped the Bolsheviks to remain in power. The use of the Cheka was one such brutal method; it ensured that the Bolsheviks remained the dominant authority, by suppressing dissident activity through the use of terror. However the Bolsheviks were only able to do this because their opposition was too weak to rebel; the Bolsheviks had gained dominance, while all others were clearly weak and submissive. This meant that the Bolsheviks use of terror only had the effect of making a weak opposition even weaker, therefore this form of brutality was only successful due to an already weak opposition.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then, right on time, the professor enters: gentleman with thick glasses and white hair cropped into a crew cut. He is the MAN who forced into exile by Lenin and the Bolsheviks 48 years earlier. For a brief eight months in Russian history--after the fall of the Romanov czars and before Lenin ushered in 74 years of Communist rule--HE was the central figure in a doomed effort to bring democracy to Russia.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cheka And The Okhrana

    • 1273 Words
    • 4 Pages

    So as aforementioned, these oppressive measures of terror were put into place by the Tsar and Lenin to preserve their own leadership and their politics, whether it be autocracy or revolution. Serge described that “from now on the psychosis of absolute power was to captivate the great majority of power1” showing how the Cheka and the Red Terror were essential to “captivat[e]ing the great majority of power” to keep Lenin’s revolution stable and in his hands. Pipes also recognises this fact: “no Tsar, even at the height of radical terrorism…was as well protected as Lenin.”2 This furthers the idea of the Cheka being used as not only to “hunt out the political enemies of the state”3 which would ensure the continuation of the Bolshevik party and their power gains, but also as a direct protection of Lenin himself. Terror organisations before, such as the Okhrana, did have effects on internal political matters, but very rarely were directly given the task to guard the Tsar and his family. Shornikova was one of the many secret agents planted by the Okhrana into the Social Democratic Party and he stated: “…I knew all the secret meeting places and passwords of the revolutionary army cells throughout Russia… I was present at all the district meetings, propaganda rallies, and party conferences; I was always in the know. All the information I gathered was conscientiously reported to the Okhrana.4”…

    • 1273 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stalin was paranoid about people trying to not conform and try to rebel against him. 93 out of 139 Central Committee members were killed and 81 of 103 generals and admirals were executed. The secret police in Russia were strong believers of Stalinism and encouraged people to inform on one another. Around 750,000 people were killed as a result of Stalin’s paranoia. In fact, a lot of the deaths during his rule were because he had a political competitor killed or citizens were killed due to harsh laws.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Axis Powers

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lenin (the leader of the Bolsheviks) was very concerned that the brutal thug who had been very useful to the party when they were an underground, illegal organization, would prove to be a thuggish influence if given government office.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The point that Huxley is making in this seen is how something new and unknown to you and your ways might come off as uncivilized. Although they do have homes and mean of climbing to get to those houses. From the beginning Lenina is not excited. She begins to pick at basic things that the savages don't do but what Bernard and Lenina were trained to do.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miriam Dobson argues that Khrushchev’s speech was necessary for voicing the ordeals of ordinary people who suffered under Stalinism who would otherwise be unheard: ‘…only the Secret speech allowed their stories to be told’. Stalinism, according to Khrushchev, was associated with ‘an army of willing perpetrators of terror, but also a mentality of fear, subservience, deceit and stifled initiative’. As such, it is also important to recognise that the critique of Stalin had only taken place once Stalin and his system had firmly established control – it was the ruler that had to be condemned, rather than the line of…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russian 1940's

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Soviet Union in the twentieth century was a tumultuous time for Russians who wished to speak their minds and for those who wished to stretch communism to the corners of the globe. With a government consumed by annihilating its opponents and censorship, Soviet writers such as Nikolai Bukharin and Grigori Deborin were compelled to depict the glory of communism or face the harshest of consequences. In “Down With Factionalism!,” Bukharin justifies his slander of Leon Trotsky in the battle to succeed Vladimir Lenin for the leadership of Russia. In Deborin’s “The Second World War,” he explains how the Soviet Union’s allies, England and the United States, let them down and how the USSR, alone, should be credited with saving Europe from Nazi Germany. Bukharin and Deborin rationalize soviet tactics through denouncing a political opponent and condemning capitalistic allies.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the show trials and ‘The Terror’, Stalin shaped the Communist Party and Soviet society to a significant extent from 1934 to 1941 through the use of fear and control to assume total power with no opposition. The Great Terror aimed to target individuals who undermined Stalin’s regime, and was catalysed by the assassination of Sergei Kirov, a Bolshevik revolutionary working below Stalin who would often challenge him. Through the use of political purges, Stalin shaped the Communist party to a significant extent, eliminating and denouncing any possible rivals while also creating fear within his government. Similarly, through the show trials and the purges, Stalin significantly restructured society, creating a need for obedience through the use of terror within soviet society. However, Stalin…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Joseph Stalin Genocide

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Gulags were every one 's worst nightmare, someone could be sent there for years just for stealing a loaf of bread, when the first Gulag was made in 1919 to when Stalin died in 1953 there were 50 million people that died in the Gulags (“Videofact”), because of what happened this made Stalin one of the most feared dictators ever.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays