Preview

Les Miserables

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Les Miserables
Ethical Theories Reflected
Upon the Main Characters from the Film Adaptation
Les Miserables by
Victor Hugo

Non-Consequentialist theories of morality are best expressed by the character Inspector Javert. His actions are lead by the theory that it is better to lead a life where rules are followed. It is your duty to obey the laws and it is your duty to always act in this manner. Consequences are not to be considered when judging a persons actions (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 46). Inspector Javert's position in society supports his actions. This man must follow the laws set by his government, and lead his community by example. His duty was to carry out the law which are examples of rule absolutes which offer no room for exceptions (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 87). The Inspector becomes obsessed with the capture of Jean ValJean, a criminal who must be caught and brought to justice.
The film begins with the story of a man, Jean ValJean, who is first introduced to the viewer in a prison setting, where later you find out he was imprisoned for theft. After serving nine-teen years of punishment in prison for his crime he is then rewarded release on parole. Following his release he encounters another situation where he acts in contrast to those beliefs of a rule utilitarian like Javert.
These contrasting characters are examples within their guiding principles. Non-Consequentialist Theories are based on the idea that consequences are not and in fact should not be a factor in determining whether the act is moral or immoral (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 46). Where as consequentialism is based or concerned with consequences. Jean ValJean's guiding principles are more of an act utilitarian who believes that everyone should perform that act which will bring out the greatest good over bad for everyone affected by the act (Thiroux, Krasemann, 2012, p. 37). Utilitarianism is a form of Consequentialism. Javert is a rule utilitarian where his ideas are that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bio Lab Essay K101

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The main objective of this lab was to observe the activity of enzyme peroxidase in real time under different experimental conditions. To see how peroxidase reacts with its substrate guaiacol under different conditions. We measure the amount of substances per test tube and then combine all of them together. Each test tube contains a measured amount of any listed substances including H₂O. Each measured amount of peroxidase along with its substrate guaiacol, and other listed substances will show how actively the enzyme oxidizes the substrate. To measure the…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the other hand, a non-consequentialist believes that an act is either intrinsically good or intrinsically bad, independent of its consequence. Hence, punishment should instead serve as a form of retribution such that only the guilty should be punished accordingly, where he or she is inflicted the same harm or suffering that they deserve.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Javert’s narrow-sighted goal compelled him to hound Valjean. His firm belief in absolutes caused his eyes to see only a criminal in Valjean. Therefore, Javert was unable to comprehend Valjean’s true soft, affectionate nature, which was hidden behind his hardened, criminal exterior. The inspector’s desire to capture all criminals urged him to follow Valjean and punish him for his crime. If Javert had not been obsessed with his goal, he would have seen that Valjean did not deserve to die as a criminal; he deserved to live like a free man. However, Javert’s unyielding goal continued to drive his actions. Since his goal did not allow him to see a difference between a compassionate and a cruel criminal, Javert continued to hunt Valjean mercilessly.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequentiality normative principles require that we first tally both the good and bad consequences of an action. Second, we then determine whether the total good consequences outweigh the total bad consequences. If the good consequences are greater, then the action is morally proper. If the bad consequences are greater, then the action is morally improper.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moulin Rouge

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Baz Luhrmann’s Moulin Rouge presents a dilemma for viewers as this movie displays the consequences of mixing obligations with personal interests and values. We see this with Satine as she is caught between two worlds in her role as a courtesan of the Moulin Rouge and also as Christian’s lover. She is obliged by her duty as a courtesan to protect Zidler’s interests, yet she also wishes to embrace the Bohemian values of Christian, those values being beauty, freedom, truth and most importantly to Christian, love. Luhrmann effectively portrays the Duke as the realistic aspect of the two worlds Satine is caught between, as he is the chief investor of ‘Spectacular Spectacular’ and owner of the deeds of the Moulin Rouge. In order for Satine to realistically fulfill her dreams as an actress, she must first escape her fantasy of love with Christian.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Consequentialism: Decides what’s moral based only on the consequencesNon-consequentialism: Considers both the means and the consequences in order…

    • 4727 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intro To Ethics

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    a. Morality as consequences: People, who do something for the sole purpose that their action has a positive consequence or outcome, are called consequentialists. There only fault is they each believe there consequence is correct.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While I do believe that consequentialism is the right way to set the standards of whether or not an action is moral, there is a major concern about it that sets it back. The set back that I am talking about is, sometimes the consequence that we want does not happen at all, and it turns into something that is completely opposite. Basically a mismatch happens in this situation. This is a problem in our ability to judge an action or person correctly. It is wrong to claim that a person’s action was immoral or even moral because the consequences turned out unexpectedly, but if we were to set our moral standards based on the idea of consequentialism this is what could happen.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lovely Bones is about a 14 year old girl called Susie Salmon who is the narrator in the film. On her way home from school one day, she is stopped by her neighbour George Harvey. He asks her to see the den he made in the cornfield. She thinks she can trust him, but regrettably he murders her. She tells her story from the place between heaven and earth, where she meets and learns about the stories of his other victims. But she can only watch as her devastated family begin their own investigation of her death. When Suzie is finally ready to move on, she goes to heaven where she feels happy and safe.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 2 Outline

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Consequentialism- the moral consequences of actions rather than with the morality of the actions themselves.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Les Miserables Essay

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “So long as the three problems of the age- the degradation of man by poverty, the ruin of women by starvation, and the dwarfing of childhood by physical and spiritual night- are not solved… books like this cannot be useless,” (Hugo Preface). In his novel, Les Miserables, Victor Hugo illustrates these problems throughout the plot, adding to the public obsession over the book. Most went crazy over the light he shone on the struggles of France in the late 1800s, instead of the happy love stories many authors were writing about at that time. Through Les Miserables, Hugo ties the degradation of man by poverty, the ruin of women by starvation, or the dwarfing of childhood into almost all of the characters introduced.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the statement, “In Les Miserables, Victor Hugo is trying to say that human nature is basically good”. Victor Hugo is doing this by having his book consist of many characters who symbolize human nature’s goodness within the story. This is because he creates goodness within the characters by making them be forgiving, thankful, become morally righteous, and possess good intentions towards helping others therefore, Hugo’s message is to tell people that human nature is good but society is what makes them sometimes posses a bad personality. Another way Hugo is saying that human nature is good is when he makes all the characters, which resemble human beings, forgive their antagonist, be compassionate, and become unselfish just like Jean Valjean and Javert did by both freeing each other. Human nature is not bad because in the book human beings do not let their id take complete control of their decision making instead they let their superego and ego take part in their decision making. Another reason why human nature is not bad is because people learn fear and hatred thus meaning that in the beginning they were good but toward the end they learned but not are bad just like some characters in the book. I agree with the statement, “In Les Miserables, Victor Hugo is trying to say that human nature is basically good”.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Adultery Wrong

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page

    Another problem with consequentialism is that the theory maintains that wrongness and rightness are not found in the action itself, but in the ramifications of it. The absurdity of this claim can be best seen with an example; adultery isn’t wrong in itself, but it is wrong when harmful effects are the result. More specifically, adultery is wrong if it causes the spouse harm, but morally correct if the result is a stronger marriage and a deeper connection. Calling adultery moral reveals the folly of consequentialism, and yet another reason why the moral rightness of an action cannot be determined by its corresponding consequences.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Im Stupid

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Punishment of a criminal causes pain, a consequentialist can hold that a world with both the crime and the punishment is better than a world with the crime but not the punishment, perhaps because the former contains more justice. Similarly, a world might seem better when people do not get pleasures that they do not deserve.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Consequentialism

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Consequentialism is a hypothesis of regulating morals. It holds that a demonstration is just good or moral in the event that it results in a decent conclusion. This is rather than deontology, which shows profound quality depends on obligation; goodness morals, which holds that ethical quality depends on a decent character; and moral relativism, which declares ethical quality depends on whatever you need it to be founded on.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics