misunderstanding from people of ill will” is the first part of King’s statement. I do not agree with…
This is a letter written by Martin Luther King, Jr. while he was being held in Birmingham Jail. He was thrown in this jail for organizing and carrying out a peaceful nonviolent protest on the racial segregation going on in Birmingham. It was one of a number of segregation protests that he was carrying out in Alabama.…
1) Honesty is most worthy but risky as well which is why I agree with your action that you…
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. produced many literary works that have maintained lasting impressions on their readers, his piece called “A Letter from Birmingham Jail” is no different. This letter was written as a response to another letter, titled “A Call for Unity,” which was written by eight clergymen on April 12, 1963 and criticized Dr. King’s protest as being untimely. The clergymen agreed that social injustices existed but that they should be settled through the judicial system and not in an “untimely” manner on the streets. “Seldom, if ever, do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas. If I sought to answer all of the criticisms that cross my desk,…I would have no time for constructive work.”(pg.1) Dr.…
The general argument made by King in his letter titled “ Letter from Birmingham Jail” is that in order for Blacks to get their rights they must use non-violent resistance. More specifically, King argues that they must demand that they get their rights and he states that with time, the non-violent resistance will make situations which will force whites to negotiate. There are two distinct sides to this very complicated issue, and while King argues that non-violent resistance is the key to acquiring their rights, one can see that the counter-argument that violence can be used as a tactic to acquire their rights may also be valid under the following circumstances such as the commence of the Zapatista movement, the American Revolution, and the…
In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King Jr. creates a powerful response to a statement by some Alabama clergymen opposing his actions in Birmingham, Alabama. The initial explanation of why King is in Birmingham later becomes the background to the letter, justifying King’s civil disobedience and explaining the immorality of racial segregation. The letter not only addresses the issues of being arrested in an unjust manner for being an “extremist” of his approach to the protest, and the incompetence of the church, but it is also an appeal to the clergymen’s opinion from his point of view. The white clergymen stereotype King as another typical African American man that is not intelligent or important…
1. Identify a list of biblical allusions King uses in this essay. Explain how these allusions to biblical figures and events appeal to both ethos and pathos.…
Mohandas Gandhi 's, "Satyagraha," and Martin Luther King Jr. 's, "Letter from Birmingham Jail," each argue for non-violent civil disobedience. However, each author uses different rhetorical appeals, such as ethos, to establish their credibility. In paragraph ten of King 's statement he asks rhetorical questions the Clergymen might have. "You may well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit-ins, marches and so forth? Isn 't negotiation a better path"(King 2)? Gandhi also does a great job of breaking down the complexity of his argument by separating his "new terms" and defining them one by one. With these two aspects in mind the authors set out their framework for their argument and presented it in their own way with their own style.…
The topic sentence in the first paragraph, "Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application", states a clear topic. It shows that the following paragraph will discuss the fact that while a law can appear to be just on its face, in its application, it really serves no justice at all. In the second paragraph the writer states that he does not advocate evading or defying the law by using the topic sentence, "In no sense do I advocate defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist." A clear topic is formed in the third paragraph as well. The writer uses the sentence, "Of course, there is nothing new about this kind of civil disobedience." This shows that he will be discussing a bit about the history of civil disobedience.…
While humans often attempt to act more evolved than their primate relatives it is often obvious that both species continued to evolve at the same rate, each one adapted to meet their specific situation, but both retained similar primitive behavior that often shined through their complex adaptations. Superiority is oftentimes one of these traits that shined through, adult males often develop superiority complexes similar to those prevalent within the animal communities. Some of these people create inhuman systems such as Jim Crow laws to prevent people they consider threats to their position from being able to challenge their ideologies and practices. King addresses these ideologies and practices in his A Letter From Birmingham Jail where he…
Martin Luther King Jr. faced many challenges during his life. One of the challenges that he faced included being criticized because of what he believed in concerning the laws of segregation. What King discloses in his essay, “Letter From Birmingham Jail,” displays how the laws of segregation have affected African-American’s. In this essay, King also brings up why he is justified in his preaching about the separation of African-Americans and white people. He uses the rhetorical appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos numerous times throughout his essay to relay his argument about the laws of segregation and the African-Americans that are being cruelly treated.…
S- To state the reason Martin Luther King Jr. is in Birmingham for attempting to change segregation as social justice and his use of civil disobedience as an instrument of freedom.…
In Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. writes to his fellow clergymen about the turpitudes he feels are taking place in Birmingham. He aims to make his audience aware of things he feels are being swept under the carpet. King uses a variety of religious references to get through to his readers. Since religion is sacred to so many, it is a powerful piece filled with emotion and logic. King's expert use of pathos invokes the emotions of his readers. Since the topic he is writing about is so serious, King sets a serious tone in this piece. By playing on the emotions of his audience, using a variety of religious references, and using a serious tone that mirrors into the mood of the piece; Martin Luther King Jr. presents a fulfilling argument on the injustices taking place in Birmingham at the time.…
This letter is very powerful. He makes very good points about our rights. One part that stood out to me was when he spoke on just and unjust laws. He talked a lot about morality and what is really morally right and wrong pertaining to our laws. When he was speaking about unjust laws, I tried to imagine living in such a time like that. Seeing amusement parks on TV but not being able to go, being abused and taunted at school it all seems so farfetched yet it was only fifty years ago. Another one of his main points that stood out to me was when he was talking about negotiation. When I was reading it I was almost finishing his sentences. Of course negotiation is the right path but when the community…
In this letter, addressed to eight “fellow clergymen” from Alabama who collectively published a letter of criticism in a newspaper on the handling of protests by King and his cohorts in Birmingham, King gives a few different takes on the difference between a just and unjust law. They've all to do with, as King says, “difference made legal”; as to say, “An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself.” It is necessary before pursuing further to explain that King believed that a just law was one, as he says, “is one that squares with the moral law, or the law of God;” by extension, King believes in absolute morality, and this becomes a foundational tenet of his argument. Likewise, an unjust law is defined as a code out of harmony with the moral law, one “that is not rooted in eternal or natural law.” (Aquinas) We can reasonably assume that the pastors to whom this letter is addressed believed at least in the concept of absolute morality or natural law as defined by God. So, King levels the playing field in that sense from the start. This, then, means that that which “distorts the soul and damages the personality”, as segregation does, is unjust; therefore, King refutes segregation by virtue of being out of line with an absolute moral law handed down to humans by God, and so condones disobeying laws that are thus. I disagree with King on these points, that there exists an absolute moral law; that a law, or anything really, may be called moral or immoral and then justified by the selfsame system of thinking. Actually, I think this was something of an error on King’s part, for, while he contends that segregation exists out of hatred, segregation and slavery has been justified by the same modality of thought that his argument uses, but with a different definition of what the “natural law” is. This is, of course, not surprising, given the glaringly inconsistent nature of the bible. One…