Preview

Liberalism and Mercantilism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1287 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberalism and Mercantilism
Liberalism and Mercantilism
International political economy is an important subdiscipline of international relation. It has three main ideologies, Liberalism, Mercantilism and Marxism. In this essay there will be three parts, first part is to demonstrate what the Liberalism and Mercantilism are on the perspective of international political economy and then the second part is to compare and contrast these two ideologies of political economy. At last, give a conclusion to the Liberalism and Mercantilism.

Liberalism
The liberal perspective on political economy is embodied in the discipline of the Western economics (Gilpin, 1987). It emphasizes the individual interests, the freedom and the maximization of economic benefit. Economic liberalism is based on the theory of “invisible hand” of Adam Smith and founded by David Ricardo in the seventeenth century. In the 1940s, Friedrich August von Hayek made a renaissance and a new explanation to it. Moreover, Milton Friedman made great contribution to the economic Liberalism in the 1970s. The basic standpoints of economic Liberalism are that people should be treated as the “rational economic animal” and market emerges spontaneously to satisfy human need. When the market running it develops according to its internal logical rule, rather than people’s will. Even through economic activity can enhance national power, the core of it is to bring beneficial to each consumer. Due to each person are both consumer and producer, so every action of each person should be a rational choice in the market. Because resources are scarce, every decision involves an opportunity cost, a tradeoff among alternative uses of available resource (Samuelson, 1980, p.27). Get something at the cost of giving up something else. Hence everyone’s rational choices contribute to a balance among various powers in the market. The balance of these various powers makes the market have its intrinsic stability. That means the market is not only an automatic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article Moral Criticisms written by Market, Ken S. Ewart, he discusses the religious criticism of the “free market” acknowledging that there are problems. The problems include selfishness, materialism, and abuse of power in the economy existing in the “free market” He clearly identifies that the free market system gives everyone the ability to pursue their own goals. The believers from the secular left believe this thought. He states “According to critics of the market, mere survival in this competitive economic system requires that we each “look after Number One.” (Ewert, 1989)…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything for Sale

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his book, Robert Kuttner (1999) tries to shake the dominant orthodoxy of laissez-faire economics, which he sees as the “natural form of capitalism,” by attempting to “reclaim a defensible middle ground” between when the market is “best left alone” and when it “needs help” (p. 5). Kuttner’s chief premise is that a mixed economy is necessary for a society that is civil and decent, a society where the economy is in optimum health. For Kuttner, unfettered laissez-faire economy is in conflict with mixed economy, and that their opposition is essentially a struggle between the moderate but rational dissent — the call for a mixed economy — and the prevailing orthodoxy, or the desire to retain the economic status quo. He further maintains that a mixed economy is realistic precisely because there is virtually no escape from politics, especially in the economic landscape where the government can influence its course by adopting certain national economic policies.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The town’s tax collector, who had been enforcing the Townshend Acts, was surrounded by a mob of people in the middle of town square. His body was coated with hot tar and feathers. This practice of feathering and tarring in the colonies was representative of the general discontent resonating within the colonies over the governmental overstep of Great Britain. Britain, after virtually disregarding the colonies for over a century, began to take a more involved stance in colonial politics. They justified this redefined relationship through the theory of mercantilism, the idea that a country’s power was hinged on exporting more than it imported and the need to pay off their incurred debt after the French and Indian War.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While trade, commerce and economy collapsed during the Middle Ages, by the Age of Exploration to the eighteenth century, Europe shifted from its once widely accepted manorial system to mercantilism—an economic policy that permitted a nation to restrict the exchange and purchasing of goods between itself and its colonies alone. However, as European powers continued to expand and dominate the world economy, they enacted strict laws and regulations that controlled the economic affairs in their respective colonies—which encouraged the controversial act of smuggling, an act that was deemed necessary by many but was seen as an economic hindrance by others. An additional document, the actual number of goods that were smuggled, displayed preferably…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freakonomics

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ten principles of economics are the main points of our economy. People face trade offs. To get one thing, you have to give up something else. The cost of something is what you give up to get it. Decision makers have to consider both the obvious and implicit costs of their actions. Rational people think at the margin. A rational decision maker takes action only if the marginal benefit of the action exceeds the marginal cost. People respond to incentives. Like I was talking about earlier, behavior changes when costs or benefits change. Trade can make everyone better off. Trade allows each person to specialize in the activities they do best. Markets are usually a good way to organize economic activity. Households and Firms that interact in market economies act as if they are guided by…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do these authors challenge/complicate this classical liberal view with reference to their political economic…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mercantilism- the essence in Mercantilist policy was the political control of the economy by the state…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “What Money can’t Buy” by Michael Sandel discusses the limits of the Market and the morals which accompany it. It is powerfully related to his ideas of Communitarianism which cannot be argued but it both helps him and condemns him in a way. I will be discussing both in the content below.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern political economic theory and philosophy can be greatly attributed to the works of two men who seemingly held polar opposite views on the subject. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, published his most well known work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776 and is most often associated with the ideas and principles of the political economic system known as Capitalism. At the other end of the spectrum is Karl Marx; the German philosopher most often associated with Communism and the author (or co-author) of The Communist Manifesto. This paper seeks to discuss the core differences in their respective political economic philosophies with regards to what economic value is and what the role of government should be in their versions of political economy. This will conclude with the argument that while Smith's work had laid the foundation for modern economic philosophy, it was Marx who would ultimately leave the most significant impression upon the world with his revolutionary ideas.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism and Freedom, written by Milton Friedman, seems to focus significantly on the connections between the economics and politics, and the effect that those have in various aspects of society. This relationship was referred to throughout the book, and the topics Friedman discusses ranged between governmental control of money, to foreign policy and trade and the effect that has on our economy. Through the course of the book, Friedman constantly refers to his “classical liberal” view, which focuses on the freedoms and power of the individual in society. Friedman shows his support of this view during the book using the idea of a laissez-faire government. For Freidman, government involvement in issues regarding society should be minimized, and the government should only really use their power to assist society when things are not going well. Friedman believes that government should only be the most basic form of overseer of the nation. The thought of the free market driving the economy strongly prevails within the book. He claims that the government should only be there to reduce the inevitable rises and falls of the economy when it is free market based. This way, the changes in the market will be able to remain less drastic. Friedman refers to the capitalist system as an unstable form of economy, and that government should be more of a support structure, rather than the basis of the economic system. He strongly believes that too much governmental influence would restrict our rights and liberties. This belief was one of his main focuses through the entire book. Friedman states in the introduction “Our minds tell us, and history confirms, that the great threat to freedom is the concentration of power.” (Pg. 2)…

    • 2518 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    liberalism source analysis

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Source one is positive towards liberalism. Liberalism essentially believes that majority of people has the ability to run their own live and therefore be given the freedom to do so. As well as it also believes that by giving the freedom to people, they will act responsibly and not become avaricious and try getting more than what they are capable of. The source is saying that the ideology of liberalism explains how everyone has the ability to make their own choices in life, due to self-interest and self-reliance, and should be given the freedom to do so. By giving the freedom to people, they will act responsibly and not get too greedy and try getting more than what they are capable to get economically. Self-interest is one’s own personal interest and/or advantages; meaning that one will do something if it benefits them somehow. Self-reliance is the quality of being solely responsible for one’s own wellbeing. Freedom is the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restrain. Economics is the branch of knowledge concerned with the production, consumption, and transfer of wealth. The source is looking at liberalism as a good position for people to prosper economically, which will help both the government and citizens. A person that would agree with this source is Scottish philosopher and economist Adam Smith. He believed that if individuals were free to make their own decisions in a free market, their self-interest (invisible hand) would benefit society as a whole. Smith also believed that government should have limited intervention, and should be there only to maintain the rule of law, to ensure contracts are followed, and to provide some public works. Nations with a capitalist ideology follow this ideology. For example, the United States is a nation with a free market were its citizens are free to work wherever they want to, and to do whatever they want with their money. The United States also believe that change is good if it benefits…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Famous encomiast Milton Friedman argues that “capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom.” In other words to obtain a total democracy, capitalism should be a key element. Although Freidman’s argument is agreeable, it lacks important characteristics that are used to create a strong argument. Arguments have rules and regulations that should be followed to make them creditable, logical, and understood by the audience. Milton Friedman ideas can be agreed with, but his argument is not convictable. Friedman’s argument is missing important qualities of a good argument these include failure to have the proper thought organization, only arguing to support his claim, and lack of solid evidence.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first approach to justice that Sandel describes is welfare. In this approach, perspectives on justice issues are based on the promotion of prosperity, improvement of living standards, and economic growth (Sandel, 2004). We often argue for or base our moral convictions in the notion that they raise living standards of the general public, an idea reminiscent of Bentham’s utilitarianism (Bentham & Lafleur, 1948). Welfare is central to the arguments of both those who condemn and those who do not support laws to impede the phenomena of price gouging. Whereas those who argue for the latter, as Sandel paints as rather fervent economic liberals, believe markets abet overall social welfare by encouraging citizens to work hard to provide the goods…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Economic Theory

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The global economy recovers from the crisis that engulfed global financial markets in the course of 2008. The effort to stave off total economic collapse has left governments burdened with massive debt that will take years of painful effort to work off. The policy prescriptions of market liberalism, including deregulation, privatization and regressive tax reform, are being advanced with seemingly undiminished confidence.Economics, as a field, got in trouble because economists were seduced by the vision of a perfect, frictionless market system. If the profession is to redeem itself, it will have to reconcile itself to a less alluring vision — that of a market economy that has many virtues but that is also shot through with flaws and frictions. The good news is that we don’t have to start from scratch. The Crisis between 2006 - 2102 basis in the microeconomics theory is a global effect. The…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Liberal Democracy

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Liberal Democracy is a merging of liberalism and democracy. Ludwig von Mises (1927) describes liberalism as a strategy for achieving the dream of freedom, rather than merely a theory. Liberalism inspires political emancipation (Kelly, 2004) to the extent where all citizens can exercise their natural rights without infringing on those of others and inevitably, ensuring the citizens’ autonomy. This objective is achieved through operating in a democracy. Democracy is a system of rule by the demos where government is formed to protect the peoples’ rights and liberty and possessions. In order for a man to truly be free, that is, to be sovereign over “himself, over his own body and mind” and not simply a subject of the state, he must have complete ownership of his property. A man’s property allows him to sustain himself in the best possible way, giving him the ability to pursuit his desires. Therefore a system needs to be put in place whereby that sovereignty is respected, encouraged and protected. Liberal democracy enables this ideology through capitalism, a system that allows people to own property, make a profit and keep what they earn though they may have to pay taxes.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays