Preview

Liberttarianism: Applying Aristotle's Dualism Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberttarianism: Applying Aristotle's Dualism Theory
1. Libertarianism is the idea that if at any one moment a person has multiple possibilities for their action, they have free will to choose whichever action they want. The first premise of the causal determinist argument is that every event occurs under a causal condition that ensures its occurrence, which disproves free will. If person A is to believe in both, this means they believe that Aristotle’s uncaused cause idea, which is that a person causes an action, but there are no causes that make a person cause that action. The only explanation for this theory is that there is an immaterial soul acting outside the laws of physics, which is uncaused, that is interacting with the body within the laws of physics, which is caused. This would mean that the soul is the uncaused aspect and the body is the caused, which would make the mind and body two separate things, supporting the dualism theory of mind and body.
2. The idea behind libertarian free will is that a person has the
…show more content…
If God were to exist, it is believed that he would be omniscient, omnipotent and morally perfect. This would mean that he knows all, has power over everything and always has perfect moral decision-making. On the surface, it seems that the existence of evil refutes the existence of God because if God does have all these qualities he could easily rid the world of all-evil, but he doesn’t. Alvin Plantinga’s argument that there is a reason for evil in the world shows that the existence of evil does not refute this idea of God. This argument states that an all-powerful God could allow the existence of evil provided that it is necessary for the attainment of some greater good. This argument shows that there may be compensatory goods in the world, which are goods that can only be appreciated while certain evils endure. This would mean that evil serves a positive purpose in the world to allow for more good, which would not refute the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Van Inwagen Summary

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    These individuals distinguish between external and internal causal factors to argue that inner psychological states are compatible with determinism because these internal states are determined by the agent. van Inwagen disagrees with this statement because he claims that it is difficult to specify which futures are open to us and which are not. Additionally, compatibilists must deny the No Choice Principle because if an individual believes in a deterministic system, they cannot simultaneously accept that there is at least one instance where one event does not uniquely determine the next. To continue, libertarians believe that determinism is incompatible with free will but there is free will in the sense that individuals seem as though they could have acted differently. van Inwagen argues this view by giving an example in which an individual is faced with a choice in which if the pulse in their brain goes to the left of a fork, the individual will make one decision and if it goes to the right, the individual will make the opposite decision.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.L. Mackie’s, “Evil and Omnipotence,” criticizes the debate for the existence of God by arguing that the fundamentals of what a “perfect God” is are inconsistent with one another. The main theological doctrines of what a “perfect God” entails are as followed: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. J.L. Mackie rejects this by stating God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent if evil exists. He asserts that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists. Mackie soon reaches the debate question of, “Can a perfect God exist when suffering exists?”…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is much debate over the issue of whether we have complete freedom of the will or if our will caused by something other than our own choosing. There are three positions adopted by philosophers regarding this dispute: determinism, libertarianism, and compatibilism. Determinists believe that freedom of the will does not exist. Since actions are events that have some predetermined cause, no actions can be chosen and thus there is no will to choose. The compatibilist argues that you can have both freedom of the will and determinism. If the causes which led to our actions were different, then we could have acted in another way which is compatible with freedom of the will. Libertarians believe that freedom of the will does exist.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: The conflict behind the idea of evil is why a perfect God would allow evil to exist on earth.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism, and discuss in detail which you think is the most convincing position in the free will debate.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The question of evil is a common hot button topic among atheists and non-Christians who attempt to disprove Christianity. They argue that an omnipotent and omniscient God cannot exist in a world with so much evil. The argument is used by them to try to prove that Christianity is “internally self-contradictory and thereby to be rejected.” Many claim that a benevolent and caring God would certainly not create evil or allow it to flourish in the world that He created. So, the problem of evil is how to explain that there can be a perfect, all-powerful, and all-loving God that exists in a world with so much moral and natural evil.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chisholm and Free Will

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before I begin it is pertinent to note the disparate positions on the problem of human freedom. In "Human Freedom and the Self", Roderick M. Chisholm takes the libertarian stance which is contiguous with the doctrine of incompatibility. Libertarians believe in free will and recognize that freedom and determinism are incompatible. The determinist also follow the doctrine of incompatibility, and according to Chisholm's formulation, their view is that every event involved in an act is caused by some other event. Since they adhere to this type of causality, they believe that all actions are consequential and that freedom of the will is illusory. Compatiblist deny the conflict between free will and determinism. A.J. Ayer makes a compatibilist argument in "Freedom and Necessity".…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument of whether God exists is an age-old debate, both sides attempting to prove their viewpoint, but neither having factual proof. Those that argue for the existence of God claim that He is wholly good, omnipotent and omniscient. However, if that were true and God did possess all three of these attributes, how is it that evil exists in the world? There is pain and suffering, crime and natural disasters that occur daily. With that being said, why does evil exist?…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will discuss if freewill is compatible with determinism. The concepts surrounding free will and determinism will be examined. The concepts are: incompatibalism, compatibalism, moral responsibility and libertarianism. Each concept has sub categories falling under the titles of hard or soft depending on the views. I will argue that freewill is compatible with determinism as there are certain things that are determined by physical process’s stemming from the formation of the universe resulting in the formation of the “laws of nature.”…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To present the topic of “the problem with evil,” without acknowledging there is a God can be confusing. I think one of the best questions that you could ask is, why does God allow evil being a perfect and loving God (Elwell, pg 413…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Libertarians would agree with this idea, suggesting we always have a choice. Christian Libertarians argue that God simply offers moral guidance but allows us to behave in the way we want to. Libertarianism is the theory that humans do have genuine freedom to make a morally undetermined decision, although our behaviour may be partially determined by external factors. Libertarianism is the view that when faced with the choice between right and wrong we do act as free agents. Generally libertarianists…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Determinist

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, by Sober, it mentions three views of freedom: hard determinism, libertarian, and soft determinism. Being a hard determinist means you do not have free will, an incompatibilist, and causal determinist. Libertarians are free and incompatibilist; soft determinist are people that say that we do have free will and are causal determinism. An incompatibilist has many options and is free to pick any one of the choices. A causal determinist is when events turn out the same even if you go back in time. In this essay I am going to argue that we should be hard determinist because we do not have free will to choose our genes and environment.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first standpoint is the evidential argument. Best introduced by Hume, it argues against the existence of God based on observations of the large amount of evil there is in the world relative to good. In Hume’s Argument from Evil, he writes, “all the goods in life united would not make a very happy man, but all the ills united would make a wretch indeed,” (pg. 234). The observations Hume makes of all the underserved suffering that occurs throughout the world paints a picture of evil so great that it appears to even over shadow the presence of good in the world. He argues that for the fact that evil is present in the world, God cannot exist or at least that God does not exist as the current omnipotent and omnibenevolent God that we generally perceive him to be. This is where the second standpoint of the problem of evil becomes clear. If evil exists, then at first impression, is God willing to prevent it but not able to? If so, then that would mean he was impotent. Alternatively, if he were able to but just wasn’t willing to, then that would make him malevolent. Finally, if he is both willing and able, then what is the purpose of all the evil we have in the universe (Epicurus, pg.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays