Principles and practice of withdrawing life-sustaining treatments
Gordon D. Rubenfeld, MD MSc
Harborview Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA
Most deaths in intensive care units occur after decisions to limit or withdraw life support [1,2]. Despite an extensive literature on whether to withdraw life support, little attention has been given to how to withdraw it [3,4]. For example, a recent edition of a critical care textbook exhaustively covers the ethical and legal aspects of life-support withdrawal, but makes no recommendations for carrying it out [5]. Only recently, in the wake of growing data that problems may exist in providing palliative care in the intensive care unit (ICU), has attention been directed to the practical aspects of withdrawing life support [6 –8]. Many practical questions about withdrawal of life support, and specifically about the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, are perplexing and controversial: Should the endotracheal tube be left in place? Should the ventilator be weaned slowly or quickly? When and how should sedation be increased? How can the concerns about relieving suffering be reconciled with fears of killing the patient? Should neuromuscular blockade be discontinued? These questions are important because clinicians face them frequently and are still confused by the goals and process of withdrawing life support, and because patients who die after withdrawal of life support may receive inadequate pain and symptom management [9,10].
Principles of withdrawing mechanical ventilation In this era of evidence-based medicine, there is a lack of data to direct clinicians in the optimal management of the dying critically ill patient. Despite the lack of data on optimal management of some aspects of withdrawing lifesustaining treatment, a general consensus exists on the ethical and clinical
References: [1] Vincent JL, Parquier JN, Preiser JC, Brimioulle S, Kahn RJ. Terminal events in the intensive care unit: review of 258 fatal cases in one year. Crit Care Med 1989;17(6):530 – 3. [2] Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155(1):15 – 20. [3] Grenvik A. Terminal weaning’’; discontinuance of life-support therapy in the terminally ill patient. Crit Care Med 1983;11(5):394 – 5. [4] Faber-Langendoen K, Bartels DM. Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospital: an empirical study. Crit Care Med 1992;20(5):570 – 7. [5] Hall J, Schmidt G, Wood L. Principles of critical care. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1992. [6] Brody H, Campbell ML, Faber-Langendoen K, Ogle KS. Withdrawing intensive life-sustaining treatment—recommendations for compassionate clinical management. N Engl J Med 1997; 336(9):652 – 7. [7] Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD, editors. Managing death in the ICU: the transition from cure to comfort. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. [8] Campbell ML. Forgoing life-sustaining therapy: how to care for the patient who is near death. Aliso Viejo (CA): AACN Critical Care; 1998. [9] Asch DA. The role of critical care nurses in euthanasia and assisted suicide. N Engl J Med 1996; 334(21):1374 – 9. [10] A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA 1995;274(20):1591 – 8. [11] Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. This Official Statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, March 1991. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144(3 Pt 1):726 – 31. [12] Lo B. Resolving ethical dilemmas: a guide for clinicians. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. [13] Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. 4th edition. New York: McGraw Hill; 1998. [14] Faber-Langendoen K. A multi-institutional study of care given to patients dying in hospitals. Ethical and practice implications. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(18):2130 – 6. [15] Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. [16] Asch DA, Hansen F-J, Lanken PN. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151(2 Pt 1):288 – 92. [17] Wachter RM, Luce JM, Hearst N, Lo B. Decisions about resuscitation: inequities among patients with different diseases but similar prognoses. Ann Intern Med 1989;111(6):525 – 32. [18] Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Reeve J, Spanier A, King D, et al. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA 1995; 273(9):703 – 8. [19] Hanson LC, Danis M, Garrett JM, Mutran E. Who decides? Physicians’ willingness to use lifesustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(7):785 – 9. [20] Truog RD, Brett AS, Frader J. The problem with futility. N Engl J Med 1992;326(23):1560 – 4. [21] Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158(4):1163 – 7. [22] Diem SJ, Lantos JD, Tulsky JA. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television. Miracles and misinformation. N Engl J Med 1996;334(24):1578 – 82. G.D. Rubenfeld / Crit Care Clin 20 (2004) 435–451 451 [23] Campbell ML, Bizek KS, Thill M. Patient responses during rapid terminal weaning from mechanical ventilation: a prospective study. Crit Care Med 1999;27(1):73 – 7. [24] Shapiro BA, Warren J, Egol AB, et al. Practice parameters for intravenous analgesia and sedation for adult patients in the intensive-care unit—an executive summary. Crit Care Med 1995; 23(9):1596 – 600. [25] Truog RD, Berde CB, Mitchell C, Grier HE. Barbiturates in the care of the terminally ill. N Engl J Med 1992;327(23):1678 – 82. [26] Solomon MZ, O’Donnell L, Jennings B, et al. Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments. Am J Public Health 1993;83(1):14 – 23. [27] Christakis NA, Asch DA. Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support. Lancet 1993;342(8872):642 – 6. [28] Christakis NA, Asch DA. Medical specialists prefer to withdraw familiar technologies when discontinuing life support. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10(9):491 – 4. [29] Gianakos D. Terminal weaning. Chest 1995;108(5):1405 – 6. [30] President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 1983. [31] Campbell ML. Case studies in terminal weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care 1993;2(5):354 – 8. [32] Treece PD, Engelberg RA, Crowley L, et al. Evaluation of a standardized order form for the withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004; in press. [33] Benditt JO. Noninvasive ventilation at the end of life. Respir Care 2000;45(11):1376 – 81 [discussion 1381 – 74]. [34] Wilson WC, Smedira NG, Fink C, McDowell JA, Luce JM. Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. JAMA 1992;267(7):949 – 53. [35] Mayer SA, Kossoff SB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology 1999;52(8):1602 – 9. [36] Kirkland L. Neuromuscular paralysis and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. J Clin Ethics 1994;5(1):38 – 9 [discussion 39 – 42]. [37] Truog RD, Burns JP, Mitchell C, Johnson J, Robinson W. Pharmacologic paralysis and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation at the end of life. N Engl J Med 2000;342(7):508 – 11. [38] Segredo V, Caldwell JE, Matthay MA, Sharma ML, Gruenke LD, Miller RD. Persistent paralysis in critically ill patients after long-term administration of vecuronium. N Engl J Med 1992; 327(8):524 – 8.