Preview

Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
133 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor
The ethical issue of altruism has been a question of debate among philosophers. This is something explain that nature of the concepts. In “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor,” Hardin employs the metaphor of a lifeboat to illustrate the potentially destructive consequence of unlimited foreign aid, as to oppose the act of altruism; in “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” the singer makes scenario that two series to the people to help children who are in poverty. First of all, people have a lot s of differences of views, but these imaginary situation make us to a distorted reality. The usage of hypothetical scenarios and statistics have the problem of misrepresentation and oversimplification of actuality. Therefore, the incorrect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PSY 301 Week 4 DQ1

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examine the concept of altruism and altruistic behavior. What does it mean for someone to behave altruistically? What is gained from this action, and how does it differ from egoistic behavior? What are some reasons why people would want to help one another, without regard for personal gain or benefit? In addition, explain the bystander effect. If we all have a genuine desire to help one another, why is the effect so common? How can we prevent it from occurring?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nobody can say that they wouldn’t help someone who is close to them; well I hope so otherwise I really need to rethink my faith in humanity; I wouldn’t go and say that every single person in the world would jump into a lake to save someone but they would try their hardest to save someone in trouble. But like the analogy that Singer uses in his essay we are more likely to give money to charities that are helping people in our own country rather than some random people halfway across the world. That’s probably because we can actually see the effect of our donations and the disasters that the people have to face. Guilt consumes us until we give into the pressures of donating, whereas if we see an ad for a charity that is helping people in third world countries we have less of an emotional connection to them because it has no effect on our lives. Peter Singer states “Moral attitudes are shaped by the needs of society, no doubt society needs people who will observe the rules that make social existence tolerable…It is quite inessential, however to, help people outside one’s own society”(Singer, pg. 469).…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world consists of different people, civilizations, and ways of life. There are many situations that call for different ways of handling them, like poverty, overpopulation, resources, and famine aid. Two very different points of view about these issues are espoused in two very different essays written decades apart, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift. Hardin’s view of civilization and the world, although harsh, has facts that could help improve the issues. Even though Swift’s opinion has personal perspective, it isn’t very realistic.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the seventies and eighties, a neoconservative development broke with the official talk of America's great intentions. New voices started to substitute an intense, hardcore anticipation of what was required for national survival in an overpopulated world. Garrett Hardin is a main neoconservative scholarly who in his generally distributed about compositions assaults the conventional compassionate perspectives of the "blame ridden," "inner voice stricken" liberal. He has a doctorate in science from Stanford University, has taught at the University of California at Santa Barbara, and has addressed at different colleges. He is the writer of books and articles on "human biology"- the investigation of how human life is maintained on our planet.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An act of kindness can develop values for both the person receiving the aid and the person offering the support as well as community development. In this summary key points are discussed on altruism. The summary stems from an act of kindness, which was conducted by the author as a student of Capstone Course in Psychology/Psy 490. I presented money to a person who needed money for his or her next meal, without expecting anything in return. A person does not realize the degree of emotions involved in experiencing need nor true concern until he or she begins to offer support with no desire of reward.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective altruists recognize that the worth of anyone is equal to their own and believe that everyone should work towards good (Singer, 2015 p. 82). Through this reasoning, effective altruists are not influence by strong emotions to help out a single, recognizable person, but are motivated to reach out to the most number of people as they can even if these people were to remain anonymous. Their minds operate so that they prioritize helping out more people rather than a smaller group (Singer, 2015, p.82). In short, in this chapter, Singer emphasizes that actions must be grounded in the reasoning of working for the good of as many people as…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Society in general would help one in need to relieve stress or because it is a good thing or a kind thing to do for someone (Cherry, n.d). Cherry (n.d), show that people do behave altruistic for selfish reason. However, it is possible for altruism to exist in this world (Cherry, n.d). When looking at the biological reason, people usually only help family members because they have to since it’s their own family. People should always help their family because they are blood relatives and it is the right thing to do. As to the societies friends, people tend to not help them often because friends are not blood related and people do not have to help those friends. This shows that people can be both selfish and altruistic, when helping others. This clearly shows that these acts can co-exist in the world, where people help they those in need with the potential of being selfish. Wilson (2015), found that humans were not the only species to be altruistic, but as well animals. A mother lion would risk her life to save her babies because it is imperative for any parent to protect their young so that they can pass on their genes. While this happens, the babies would carry on their mother’s genes and become altruistic lions for their future family (Wilson, 2015). This shows that animals can be altruistic to benefit their family's kin…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, Deaton claims that sending money to save lives doesn’t have the impact that effective altruists believe and can even cause harm to those they are trying to help. He argues that if we truly want to help the most people, we should solve the larger issues that are behind the poverty and lack of healthcare that effective altruists commonly target with their donations. While it is true that only sending money to charities won't necessarily solve all of the problems in poor countries, Deaton overlooks the importance of the lives that are saved through these donations. There are still many people who would die or suffer without the work of charities like those that effective altruists donate to. We should not only try to create larger political and societal change, but also…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now, let’s look at a definition of altruism: Altruism involves the unselfish concern for other people. It involves doing things simply out of a desire to help, not because you feel obligated to out of duty, loyalty, or religious reasons. (psychology.about.com)…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Premise 4: Altruism therefore means that it permits no concept of a self-respecting, self-supporting man- a man who supports his life by his own effort and neither sacrifices himself nor others.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Response

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer argues that many people are not willing to put aside their wants, and make a sacrifice to help impoverished children. Now, evolutionary psychologists tell us that human nature just is not sufficiently altruistic to make it plausible that many people will not sacrifice so much for stranger (327). This statement saddens me, because what if that is your or your family, and somebody thought of you all strangers, and would not want to help your family out of poverty? Singer then explains that we ought to do things that predictably most of wouldn’t (327). Majority feel that if does benefit them in the end then why bother. Honestly, donating will benefit you it makes you feel like a better person, and you have helped an individual in need. Sometimes you should sacrifice your wants for others needs. As singer states the life of a child is more important then going to fancy restaurants, the next time you dine out know that you could…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics