Preview

linguage

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8078 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
linguage
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.

Labour in power 1945-1951
1234-

landslide victory re-entering peacetime labour’s achievements: economic- political- social
Loss of the 1951 general election

1- Landslide victory: 1918, one year after the Bolshevik revolution –Clause IV- , people made rules interpreted as social programs. The labour Party formed a

national government in 1924, with equality with the liberated lasted 9 months because they were two different ideologists, so equality collapsed. Labour changed in 1929 - economic crisis, Wall Street crush-, it created a split inside the labour leadership so the task would be very difficult. The leader Ramsey
MacDonald accepted to form qualition with the conservatives but many others did not accept & he seen as traitor & he was expelled from the party – the Great
Betrayal-. The conservatives in 1931 took part in government.
-Why would the British go to war after what they had lost in the WWI? – Britain was not in favour of going to another war; it found herself involved in the WWII unwillingly. The Germans had invaded Poland, so England was in war against Germany “the People’s War”. In 1940, Churchill became a national qualition government –all parties will join & make a government-. They were fighting a war, all the effort of the country will be directed to winning it.
- Why did labour socialists representatives of the working class join the government? Preparing themselves for after the war. During war time, the NQG put into place a ROYAL PARLIAMENT SELECT COMMITTEE, shared “head” by a liberal member of parliament. The sociologist “William Henry Beveridge” gave the government the
“Beverage Report” of 1942, in order to offer solutions & look after what was wrong in the war with Britain. The report started to revive the ideas of the “Welfare
State”, which came as an opposition to what Hitler was promising “Total Destruction”. Welfare
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959
    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959

    WW2 made a huge dent in Britain’s economic capability in terms of international trade and the fact that half of our factories had been converted to build military equipment. Not long before the General Election the economy had begun to pick up.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was the National Government 1931-1939 in Dealing with Social-Economic Problems They Faced?
    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Successful Was the National Government 1931-1939 in Dealing with Social-Economic Problems They Faced?

    In 1931 the situation worsened and there was fear that the budget was unbalanced, which was allowed by the independent May Report which triggered a confidence crisis. The Labour Government agreed to make changes in taxation and expenditure in order to balance the budget and restore confidence, but the Cabinet could not agree on the two options available which was either introduce tariffs, or make 20% cuts in unemployment benefit. A final vote was taken on the issue and the Cabinet was split 11:9 with a minority including many political heavyweights such as George Lansbury threatening to resign rather than agree. Due to this unworkable split, on 24 August 1931 the government resigned. Both the Conservative and Liberal parties met with King George V and MacDonald, first to discuss support for the measures taken but again to discuss the shape of the next government. On 24 August MacDonald agreed to form a National Government composed of "men from all parties" with the specific aim of balancing the Budget and restoring confidence. The Government was then meant to resolve once these aims had been met and a general election was to be held.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Were The Liberal Government In The Years 1906-1914
    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain How Successful Were The Liberal Government In The Years 1906-1914

    The Liberal government of 1906-1914 under Bannerman and Asquith is one often recalled for its extensive reform of the welfare system in the United Kingdom. However, it was their political and constitutional reform which caused the most uproar, as they were arguably the most successful government of the 20th century in regards to changing the way Britain was governed. Their greatest achievement was the 1911 Parliament Act where they managed to get the Lords to sign a bill limiting their own power.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Was Concern over National Security the Real Reason for Liberal Reforms Passed Between 1906 and 1914?
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Far Was Concern over National Security the Real Reason for Liberal Reforms Passed Between 1906 and 1914?

    By the early twentieth century the Liberal Government was worried that Britain’s military capability and general military power was not as strong and it once was. Therefore, the Government’s concern over national security definitely influenced the decision for the reforms. However, there are three main factors that also need to be taken into account when deciding if concern over national security was the real reason for the reforms: the Social reasons, concerns for Britain’s Empire and the Political motive. The Social reasons played a large part in persuading the Liberals to reform. The detailed reports of Booth and Rowntree, and the evidence which was brought to light, highlighted that nearly a 1/3 of Britain’s population lived in poverty. This needed to be addressed by the Government. In addition, criticisms of the Poor Law effectively put pressure on the Liberals. The Boer War shone light on the ineffective and malnourished British Army. Britain’s embarrassing performance and recruitment in the War raised concerns over Britain’s overall military capability and the general health of Britain’s populace. In addition to this, the Liberal Government was concerned that Britain was losing its status as a major industrial power. Political motives for reform include the changing attitudes within the party, New Liberalism, the fear of the ever increasing popularity of the Labour Party and the party advantage which the Liberals would have received from introducing reform.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bread For All Summary
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bread For All Summary

    H. Pelling argue that the reforms were actually unwanted by the working class: “the extension of the power of the state at the beginning of this century, which is generally regarded as having laid the foundations of the Welfare State, was by no means welcomed by members of the working class, was indeed undertaken over the critical hostility of many of them, perhaps most of them”. Pat Thane gives further evidence for this theory. The fact that the more far-reaching of the Liberal reforms only begun in 1908, after Campbell-Bannerman’s resignation, also seems to count against any theory which ascribes sole responsibility for the reforms to Labour and the working class: nothing major changed in terms of Labour MPs or working class opinion in these two years; the major change was a “New Liberal” politician taking over from a Gladstonian liberal. The ideology of individual politicians was arguably more important, and this was influenced by Booth, Rowntree, and T.H. Green. It is also important to consider the timing of the reforms – had they been due entirely to working class enfranchisement and pressure, surely they would have occurred immediately after the 1867 Reform Act, rather than in the early twentieth…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Why the Liberal Government intr
    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Why the Liberal Government intr

    Labour Party growth was a key factor in the Liberal Governments desire to introduce reforms affecting children as the Labour Part was emerging as the party for the working class, a position that the Liberals had previously held. In the 1906 elections the Labour Party had gained 30 seats where previously they had held 2 after the 1900 election, between 1907-09 they also made some gains in by elections. David Lloyd George summarised the position of the Liberal Government in a speech where he said that the only way to guarantee Liberal support was through reform. This meant that through the years’ jop 1906-08 the Liberal government passed reforms that affected children as it was hoped it would guarantee support from the parents of the working class as it would be clear that the Liberal Government was interested in helping the working class. Growth of the Liberal Party also resulted in the development of New Liberalism in the Liberal Party which also contributed to the reforms for children.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Were The Labour Welfare Reforms
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Successful Were The Labour Welfare Reforms

    The New Labour Government came in to power in a ‘Landslide’ election victory. The Government was led by Clement Atlee and introduced reforms. The reforms were in Social Security, Health, Housing, Education and Employment.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far did the Liberals improve the lives of the British people?
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How far did the Liberals improve the lives of the British people?

    The Liberals created many reforms which impacted the lives of British people differing between aid and attention for well being of all ages and insurance for the unemployed or sick. This essay will investigate whether they were of positive or negative on the British people.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How successful were the Liberals in promoting the welfare of the children, workers and the elderly in the years 1906-1914
    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How successful were the Liberals in promoting the welfare of the children, workers and the elderly in the years 1906-1914

    The first of the Acts set up for the welfare of the workers was the Trade Boards Act 1909 which instigated the inspection of conditions in certain trades, effecting 200,000 workers who initially were mostly women. But this only covered the ‘sweated’ trades and ignored other workers such as farmers and on the whole there were very few inspections. So again while the Liberals were making some effort, the limitations of the act cancelled out the effects it was supposed to create.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Attlee a truly revolutionary MP?
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was Attlee a truly revolutionary MP?

    Perhaps, the most ‘revolutionary’ reform that Labour introduced was the NHS. Although there was liberal influence and consensus between the parties over welfare, the clear historical fact remains that Atlee’s Labour party introduced this. The public were in dire need of better healthcare – especially those who couldn’t afford it. Unfortunately, the majority of the population after the war were still living on a very small income and not many people in society could afford health services.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Labour Reforms 1945-1951
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Labour Reforms 1945-1951

    When the war ended in 1945, the Labour Government, led by Clement Atlee, were faced with tackling numerous problems that existed in Britain. Their aim was to meet the welfare needs of the British people who, during the war, got used to support provided by the government. In 1942, a Civil Servant and an experienced worker on social welfare named William Beveridge constructed a report which would go on to become the basis for the Labour reforms. By 1951, Labour had introduced many different reforms aiming to tackle the problems that faced Britain. The Beveridge Report identified what is known as the 5 giants; these include disease, want, squalor, idleness and ignorance. Arguably the most important and successful were the acts introduced to tackle disease and want, but some may disagree. Nevertheless, it is clear that the Labour government met most of the needs of the British people between 1945-1951.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Liberal reforms higher history
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Liberal reforms higher history

    The enfranchisement of the working classes meant the newly formed Labour party together with socialist ideologies were beginning to put pressure on the Government to introduce reform. (2/3)…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Assess The Causes Of Poverty In The 19th Century
    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Assess The Causes Of Poverty In The 19th Century

    Booth and Rowntree were only responsible for the Liberal reform to an extent, as there were other significant motives such as the national security. Britain was involved in the Boer War and many soldiers/individuals were rejected by doctors, which caused a major concern for the government as it signified the lack of good health in the population, however, national efficiency was more influential as it challenged Britain’s position. Peter Murray also points out that concerns over national efficiency were reinforced by the findings of Booth and Rowntree. (Poverty…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics