Preview

Lipitor Marketing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
782 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lipitor Marketing
A potential problem for Pfizer Lipitor brand and their R&D activities, as well as their business in general, is the fact that Lipitor will soon lose its patent protection. The problem is that they do not have any suitable replacements for the revenue that will soon be lost due to the emergence of generic drugs following a branded drugs loss of patent protection. Their main source of revenue, Lipitor (sales of $10 billion last year), will lose its patent protection in 2010.
4 Alternative/Suggested Solution Above Figure highlights 5 possible marketing strategies solutions that Pfizer can make to face the problem of Lipitor patent expiry and threat of generics capturing market share & price competition war.
4.1 Divest Strategy
Divest strategy involves cutting expense related with promotions & researches once Lipitor faces direct competition from similar drug generics and use the savings towards other brands that still have patent protection. Along the way, Divest strategy might involve price increases to take advantage of higher brand awareness among patients, doctors, media,…etc. However, this will also result in lowest brand building as brand is not supported and price competition.
The success of this strategy hinges on the inertia of doctors, patients and the other stakeholders (pharmacists, HMOs, governments). When their motivation to switch to the newly-available generic is low, either because of low financial incentives or strong attachment to the brand or to the value of brand equity for funding research and development, such a strategy can deliver high profitability, at least over the short term. Over the longer term, however, the profitability of this strategy depends on the elasticity of the other still-patent protected drugs to the additional promotional investments.
4.2 Innovate Strategy
Innovate strategy involves introducing a completely new molecule, Pfizer can launch new forms, demonstrate effectiveness for new indications. This way, Divest

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pfizer has experienced challenges in recent years, with more than $2 billion in legal settlement payments over marketing practices for drugs in 2009. Additionally, Pfizer could face tremendous revenue loss as drug patents, which account for 40% of their sales, expire in the coming years. Pfizer will have to face some corporate finance challenges which include litigation, discontinued projects, focus on blockbusters, loss of revenue, exposure to generic drugs and FDA regulatory oversight.…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eco 561 Wk 4

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the realm of pharmaceutical drug sales, there are many players in the market. Many of these companies have a large inventory of drugs that they manufacture. The subdivision of the pharmaceutical market that draws the most revenue is oncology medications. Many companies will specialize in drugs for only one type of cancer, or sometimes with only one drug period. The cost of research and development in this field is much higher than any other disease subdivision. With many companies focusing on specific treatment plans there is a real opportunity to corner the market. The sale of oral medication is on the rise, by getting ahead of the generic sales of these oral agents, the company can establish itself at the forefront of contemporary cancer treatment. The following will point out ways to boost revenue, determine maximizing profit strategies, and creating barriers to establish this company as the leader in oncologic pharmaceutical sales.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In our efforts to predict what will happen to Viagra once our patent expires, we reviewed another Pfizer’s drug, Zoloft, as a case example. Zoloft was the leading antidepressant drug that brought in $3.3 billion in sales before its patent expired on June 30, 2006. It faced branded competition from Effexor XR from Wyeth, Paxil and Welbutrin XL from GlaxoSmithKline, and Cymbalta from Eli Lilly & Co. The demand for Zoloft was inelastic before patent expiration which allowed Pfizer to set a high price for the drug. Demand then became elastic when generics entered the market post-patent expiration. The below graphs display this change in demand elasticity for Zoloft. We expect this will be the same for Viagra.…

    • 2398 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prescription drugs whose patents have expired are highly elastic; however, prescription drugs whose patents still exist are highly inelastic. Many consumers will substitute generic brands for drugs that have had their patents expire. These generic drugs can be produced at a much lower cost and yet still contain the active ingredients and FDA approval to their brand name equivalent. As a result, supply increases along with demand and puts downward pressure on price. Because there are no substitutes for patented drugs, consumers have no choice but to pay the higher prices determined by supply and demand…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hi Catherina Case Study

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    The illustration you provide regarding the Coricidin HBP and its advantages when it was first introduced on the market was significant. As other competitors begin to see the benefits they will commence to create a similar product which will increase the competition. As you can see, although competitors may try to replicate the products that does not guarantee it will be successful, as you noted the dissatisfaction with the CVS brand as it failed to meet customer’s expectation. This medication is targeted to a specific group of individual historical had to suffer needlessly with a cold, so now that the product is available it will increase profits for the manufacturer. I believe when marketing products to a select group it is…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The competitive elements currently operating in the U.S. healthcare system are the character of the constantly transforming industry. The increase of the pace of competition within the healthcare system takes place among different organizations. This paper will describe the different forms of that competition among organizations, explain the benefits and the downfalls of competition, offer an alternative if competition was not the main force behind the U.S. healthcare system, define elements of successful competition, explain how competitive intelligence is used, illustrate how competition influences both the services offered by healthcare organizations and the choices patients have.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Business Wire, comp. "Pharmaceutical Distibution in Europe: pfizer Breaks the Mold." Market Research.com. 9 Aug. 2007. Pfizer Inc. http://www.marketresearch.com/product. Kerin, Roger A., Steven William Hartley, and William Rudelius. Marketing : The Core. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, The, 2006. “The Pharmaceutical Industry: A Discussion of Competitive and Antitrust Issues in an Environment of Change”. USA. Federal Trade Commission. "Working togther for a healthier world." Pfizer. 2008. Pfizer Inc. "Zyrtec." Zyrtec. 2007. McNeil -PPC. http://zyrtec.com.…

    • 5213 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Merck & Co

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Merck had a 14% increase in sales between 1997 and 1998 and 22% increase in sales from 1998 – 1999, and a 13% annual increase in earnings over the same period. Merck’s business strategy consists of two parts: (1) developing and marketing new drugs through internal research, and (2) developing partnerships with smaller biotechnology companies. Since 1995, Merck had launched 15 new products that earned $5.9 billion on sales of $32.7 billion. Furthermore, Merck may agree to license new drugs from other firms and with its larger capital and greater assets, can assume the risk of submitting the drug through various regulatory approval phases. If the drug becomes profitable, Merck can earn significant cash flows while paying a royalty to the licensor. However, most important is the option that Merck has in deciding when to abandon or continue on this project (deferability or optionality). If Merck reaches a point when its expected NPV is negative, it can simply abandon the project.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Reform

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The popular brand name versus the generic battle is a concern in the prescription medicine industry. The uses of brand name drugs have decreased to 20% of total distribution. The expiration of patents of drugs, led to the decrease in brand name distribution. This affects the health care industry in an intense way. This multi-billion dollar industry is affected and patients and physicians must choose whether the generic brand will suffice. Choices by consumer are affected because the cost…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "In 1984, the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (also known as the Hatch-Waxman Act) created an abbreviated approval process for generic prescription drugs and at the same time extended patent terms for innovator drugs" (Cook, 1998). The Chairman of the Senate Committee of the Budget authorized an analysis of the impact generic drugs had on brand-name drugs as a result of this act. The study had two objectives – examine the extent to which competition has increased and how that competition has affected the returns from developing a drug (Cook, 1998).…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck Case

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Merck had a 14% increase in sales between 1997 and 1998 and 22% increase in sales from 1998 – 1999, and a 13% annual increase in earnings over the same period. Merck’s business strategy consists of two parts: (1) developing and marketing new drugs through internal research, and (2) developing partnerships with smaller biotechnology companies. Since 1995, Merck had launched 15 new products that earned $5.9 billion on sales of $32.7 billion. Furthermore, Merck may agree to license new drugs from other firms and with its larger capital and greater assets, can assume the risk of submitting the drug through various regulatory approval phases. If the drug becomes profitable, Merck can earn significant cash flows while paying a royalty to the licensor. However, most important is the option that Merck has in deciding when to abandon or continue on this project (deferability or optionality). If Merck reaches a point when its expected NPV is negative, it can simply abandon the project. As a licensee, Merck can allow smaller biotechnology firms to focus on research and development. These smaller firms often have smaller budgets and are not financially or personnel equipped to handle the costly and long FDA approval process, and the subsequent marketing, distribution, and sales of new drugs. This task is better suited for a larger company, such as Merck, which has more resources and money.…

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pfizer's overall present financial condition is not secure, but is trending positively for 2006 compared to the previous year. The positive trends are related to the major products the company has in its pipeline. "Pfizer is poised to introduce six new medicines in 2006, including three (Chantix (smoking cessation), Stutent (cancer), and Exubera (diabetes)) that have billion dollar-plus potential." An analysis of Pfizer's finances will include: revenues and growth, stock price, net income, budget for R&D, cash flow, and EPS.…

    • 3375 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. Pfizer’s Lipitor Strategy Changes the Generics Game, Posted on November 30, 2011, Available at: http://bournepartners.wordpress.com…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The repercussions of product innovation crisis in big pharma drive the generic pharmaceutical industry to…

    • 6281 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper

    • 4491 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Lipitor is highly profitable because the drug is protected from direct competition by a 20-year patent. This temporary monopoly allows Pfizer to charge a high price. Once the patent expires, other firms will be able to produce generic versions of Lipitor, and the price will fall—typically by 80 percent within a year—but that is some time away.…

    • 4491 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays