Liquidizing Goldfish Not A Crime Summary

Art is a limitless way of expressing inner thoughts, conflicts, or raising awareness on a specific topic. Many artists now are using all types of techniques for their messages to impact their audience and start a conversation on numerous issues. The thought of absolute freedom in art is what got Marco Evaristti in trouble. The article “Liquidizing Goldfish ‘Not a Crime’” brings up the topic of Evaristti’s art piece Helena pertaining to animal cruelty. His goal was to reveal the battle between good and evil within people. His form of expressing this was by putting goldfish in blenders to have people press the on button if they wanted to, which would kill the goldfish. Evaristti was not charged with any cruelty charges because the fish died painlessly and quickly. Should artists place a limit on the way they express their art? Although an
It would have enraged a whole lot more people, and Helena would be known among everyone. Evaristti wanted his art to revolve around the topic of human destruction, so using fake fishes in the blender may not have the same impact as it would by using the same fishes, but it would have saved a life. There are other ways that Evaristti can shed light on the dark side of human nature without taking a life away. The message of the art already came alive while looking at the piece; people were debating on pressing the button, there was no need for live fish to be in there. Many did not put a lot of thought or argument because the animal used was fish. A fish’s life does still hold as much value as another human