Preview

List and Explain Six Differences and Six Similarities Between the Political Philosophy of John Locke and That of Tomas Hobbes.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2171 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
List and Explain Six Differences and Six Similarities Between the Political Philosophy of John Locke and That of Tomas Hobbes.
THE UNIVERSITY OF ZAMBIA
SOCIAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
INSTITUTE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION /DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

NAME : SELVAC HANG’ANDU
COURSE CODE : PH 101
COURSE NAME : POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
COMPUTER NO. : 12116173
QUESTION : List and explain six differences and six similarities between the political philosophy of John Locke and that of Tomas Hobbes.

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were philosophers from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The two men both had very strong views on freedom and how a country should be governed. Their view points are famous for contrasting one another. Hobbes has more of a pessimistic view on freedom while Locke’s opinions are more optimistic.
This paper will attempt to examine six differences and six similarities between political philosophy of John Locke and that of Tomas Hobbes.
To appreciate this paper ,will first define political philosophy which will be followed by a discussion of differences and similarities between political philosophy of John Locke and Tomas Hobbes.The paper will then end with a conclusion of the issues identified and discussed
It is difficult to formulate a precise definition of political philosophy because it seems to have no subject matter of its own ,It main tasks are in part to describe past and existing social organization ,in which respect it seems to duplicate the findings of Economics ,Political science ,anthropology ,biology and sociology;and in part to evaluate these organization, in which respect it is like ethics.
We can further characterize political philosophy by dividing it like ethics, into classical and modern theories.Classical political theoriesmay be defined, roughly as those which offer advice for achieving an ideal society.Modern theories on the other hand are primarily devoted to what we have called philosophical analysis i.e. the purpose of clarifying the meaning of this advice and of the terms we use in political discussion.



Bibliography: Johari J.C, 1989.Principles of modern political science, 1stedition. New Delhi. JJohari J.C, 2006.Contemporary political theory, 2nd edition 1987, New Delhi. Chand. S., 1988.Politicaltheory, 4thedition, Ram, Nagar, NewDelhi. Tomas Hobbes, theLeviathan, everyman. Talcott parsons, 1949.The structure of social action

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were very different Enlightenment philosophers.They had many similarities and differences on what form of government they should form for the people.For example Thomas Hobbes believed in a powerful government,and John Locke believed in a limited government where the government should protect the people’s natural rights. Both of these philosophers were seventeen century enlightenment thinkers.Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had very different points of view on how the government should be formed for the people.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Hobbes, the need of an outright power, as a Sovereign, took after from the utter ruthlessness of the State of Nature. The State of Nature was totally grievous, thus objective men would will to submit themselves even to outright power with a specific end goal to escape it. For John Locke, 1632-1704, the State of Nature is an altogether different sort of spot, thus his contention concerning the social contract and the way of men's relationship to power are subsequently entirely distinctive. While Locke uses Hobbes' methodological gadget of the State of Nature, as do for all intents and purposes all social contract scholars, he utilizes it to a very distinctive end. Locke's contentions for the social contract, and for the privilege of residents…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A prosecutor and a defense attorney are different in a lot of ways. In all cases, the prosecution is the lawyer that acts on behalf of the state and victim(s) in a case. The defense counsel is the lawyer who represents the party being accused in the legal matter that they are charged in. Both are present in court and debate back and forth against the evidence being presented, proving that the defendant is to be found guilty or innocent. One major difference is that the prosecution is to seek justice, not just to convict for the state or victim. The defense is usually hired by the accused and act on behalf of the accused. In any legal matter both of these sides have equal rights. Both the prosecution and the defense serve many functions throughout…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were to philosophers with opposing opinions on human nature and the state of nature. Locke saw humanity and life with optimism and community, whereas Hobbes only thought of humans as being capable of living a more violent, self-interested lifestyle which would lead to civil unrest. However, both can agree that in order for either way of life to achieve success there must be a sovereign.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Artificial sweeteners are chemicals or natural compounds that replace the sweetness of sugar, without all of the calories. But sometimes the label 'sugar-free' masks calories present in the food or drink. Aspartame, which is in Equal is a common chemical sweetener with crazy possible side effects. Effects include hallucinations to seizures and brain tumors; it is hardly worth consuming for the sake of saved calories in my opinion. Then you also have Sucralose, which is known as Splenda. Recent research suggests that Splenda can enlarge both the liver and kidneys and shrink the thymus glands. Splenda reportedly can cause skin rashes, panic, diarrhea, headaches, bladder issues, stomach pain, and those side effects don't even sum it up. In addition to all of this, consider the waste involved in the industry of artificially sweetening. Ever stepped into a coffee shop and noticed a mound of sugar substitute packets building on the counter or in the trash? We've been wasting one of our most precious resources for the sake of a sweetener that can harm our bodies and prevent weight loss. So what you can do instead to get your sugar fix? Turn to natural sweeteners for your drinks and food alike. Honey, agave nector, organic maple syrup, brown rice syrup, and stevia are just a few natural sweeteners you can turn to. Not only will they wreak your body less, but your support of these sweeteners instead will, eventually, help to slow the production of toxic artificial sweeteners. I am interested in this topic because so many people that I know use artificial sugar. My mom however, has never let us use things like sweet and low or splenda because she was always aware of the bad things that happen in your body because of these artificial sugars. I want to be able to answer the question “well why is it bad?” when people ask me why they shouldn’t use splenda and sweet and low. I will approach this as an informative paper, letting the audience know why…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke agreed with Hobbes on certain things but he also disagreed with him too. He wrote in the second treatise of government that man need to be governed by a ruler. John Locke is also famously known by what he believed in which was life, liberty, and property. These were the natural rights of man given by the government and if the government took away these rights, man has a reason to overthrow the government. As said before the idea that Locke said and believed influenced Thomas Jefferson to write the declaration of independence.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau both have similar views on man's nature, authority and freedom. Those views are that all men are essentially equal and that each individual has the right to life, liberty, and property. They believe that these rights are given by God, and thus natural. They also believe that reason is a God-given and religious liberty, and right to freedom of speech. The differences are that Locke believed that when people gave up their rights they gave up there freedom to be safe. Rousseau believed that when people gave up their rights to the government they…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke as an English Philosopher passed on his concepts to others. Later in his life, Locke wrote a book titled Two Treatises of Government, which contained his ideas of civil government. The first treatise is described as a duty of charity to those who have no other means of subsistence. However, Locke’s Second Treatise conceptualizes the meaning of natural rights and natural law. According to scholar Steven Forde, Locke “asserts, that men in the state of nature are free and equal, and at liberty to do as they wish but only “within the bounds of the law of nature.” His perceptions also include the design of innate ideas; his thinking of a blank slate provides his proof that you must learn from experience. Thomas Hobbes, who thought…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Imperialism

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To better comprehend the reasons behind the philosophers’ dissimilarity in ideology, it is rather helpful to make sense of the historical circumstances of these two men. Thomas Hobbes was born in England in 1588. He claims that his premature birth was the result of his mother going into labor early after she heard that the Spanish Armada was on its way to invade England. Regarding the event of his birth, Hobbes wrote in his autobiography, “My Native place I'm not asham'd to own; Th'ill Times, and Ills born with me, I bemoan: For Fame had rumour'd, that a Fleet at Sea, Wou'd cause our Nations Catastrophe; And hereupon it was my Mother Dear Did bring forth Twins at once, both Me, and Fear” (Hobbes Autobiography 2).…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy is referred to as a set of beliefs, concepts and attitudes held by an individual or a group of people. It is the study of problems in general and the prescription of solutions to problems based on critical and systemic analyses and the employment of rational argument. Philosophy through the lens of Political Science does so as mentioned above in terms of the state, the governance of the state the ethics of an individual in possession of political power. Political philosophers focus on the issues relating to the state, such as political action that need or need not be taken and the general behavior of a given individual involved in politics. With the focus set on just the state, political action and violence, two philosophers have critically analyzed politics through the three concepts listed above: Niccolo Machiavelli and Max Weber. They each have their own views, opinions and suggestions that both have similarities and differences considering the cultural and temporal inconsistency between the both of them. The fact that some of their ideas intersect is fascinating.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theories of The State

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When we hear the word Iconic, we think of something or someone that stands out, one that, through its actions has been of great significance and has made a lasting impression on the way you live and society entirely.…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays