Couples there are living after the LAT term, can pursue both the intimacy of being a couple together, and at the same time conserve autonomy. “LAT setup can be seen across a wide range of ages and socioeconomic backgrounds, and is becoming increasingly understood and socially accepted.” The arguments listed below, are a few of the positive and negative in the debate of Living Apart Together. In the second text appear quite different views on the ‘L.A.T.’ A clinical social worker, Jeanette Lofas, advocates living apart. “(…) because blended families are so vulnerable to internecine resentments and power struggles.” Another expressive person who says his opinion is professor Popnoe. He acknowledges the living apart together makes sense for some people. He mentions the elderly or divorced people, but for others he is afraid that an L.A.T relationship might weaken their ability to create a long-term relationship. He also claim that it’s the younger couples who turn to ‘living apart together’ after having a baby too early or not being able to commit. He says that younger couples often turn to L.A.T, after a failed marriage, specifically if there are children involved. The last point I would elucidate, is Ms. Hess’s. She is a 61 years old woman from Berkeley, who claims that many people try very hard to fit into a model of relationship, that maybe never work out. She says that it could save a lot of pain and breakups, if people knew about Living Alone Together. She says: “Many people are trying to fit themselves into a very narrow model for long-term relationships that does not work for their personalities (..) if more people saw living apart as an option it might save them a lot of pain and breakups.”
The third text is called: “Just What Modern Romance Needs: Living Apart Together” and it’s written by Gary Picariello. His opinion has already been clarified in the headline. According to him, L.A.T is just for couples that don’t want to commit. Still he argue for- and against ‘Living Apart Together’ First in the text, he is positive about the term. He believes that you value and appreciate the other person more when you finally meet. He claims: “I guess it makes some sense when you think about it: if familiarity breeds contempt, then having separate places to retreat to means that you’re more likely to appreciate each other when you do get together” Despite his positive angle of the trend, he still sums up his article, with his own opinion. An opinion that shows his distinct is against this trend. Furthermore he creates his own new trend called: “Living Together Forever - LTF”. At this point, he really gets to state his final point: That the only kind of relationship that works is the one where you live together forever. This text is also characterized by the way Mr. Picariello expresses himself in, as if he was talking directly to another person. It’s affecting the article on a good way, I think. It’s very naturel and you feel like you attend the conversation. For example he wrote: “So what’s the deal with ‘Living Apart Together’?” He also uses a lot of facts, for example about the Italian people.
I text one, Mrs. Bennett says, that ‘it has become less odd to be living apart together because we live in a century where work has become a higher priority which leads to such things as stress.’ Therefore it could be a good idea for some couples to live separated. I found it individually from one person to another, to decide rather you would live after this new trend, or live together. There could be a lot of advantages in making the relationship work by living apart. You fell a sort of freedom in the relationship that you can’t find in a ‘Living together’ relationship. When this is said, I have to say that it (according to me) is a little bit different, when it comes to having kids. Then I think the trend is dealing with what the parents want, and that is a selfish and an immature way to live. – When you are raising your children as parents there are living separately, it may give the child a worse upbringing environment. When it comes to an end, a child should grow up with both parents.
--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/autonomous-and-committed-living-apart-together-170180
[ 2 ]. ”Home Alone Together” – Jill Brooke. p. 4, l. 25-26
[ 3 ]. ”Home Alone Together” – Jill Brooke. P. 6, l. 65-67.
[ 4 ]. ”Just What A Modern Romance Needs: Living Apart Together” – Gary Picariello. P. 7, l. 27-29.
[ 5 ]. ”Just What A Modern Romance Needs: Living Apart Together” – Gary Picariello. P. 7, l. 7
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Having a child in that situation may prove problems down the road, as parents are not “tied down” or “locked into” the relationship leaving many children without both parents. Also separating is cheaper than divorce for these types of couples. Also…
- 654 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As stated in our text, various factors can bind married couples together, such as economic interdependencies, legal, social and moral constraints, relationship, and amongst other things. In the recent years some of these factors have diminished their strengths. The modern generation sees marriage in a different perspective altogether. Individuals today feel they are stable independently, they do not need to rely on their spouse for emotional or financial support. Many are career driven and soar to conquer their dreams over settling down with a family. Such untraditional views have increased divorce rates.…
- 740 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
- Conflict with Simin is that she is very adamant to leave his despite his supplications…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2. What accounts for the view that living together for a period of time is considered socially acceptable and deciding to maintain such an arrangement with no intention of ever marrying is not is the fact that a couple who moves in together is one step closer to getting married in the social world. Couples who don’t get married are looked down on because in the social world once you move in with your partner, your next step is marriage. I believe its okay to live together and if you don’t want to get married you shouldn’t have to. Marriage isn’t for everyone, especially not me.…
- 422 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Live-in relationships are a better way to determine if the partner is right: I have seen many couples who date and plan to stay together in order to figure out whether their relationship would work in the future or not. However, according to psychology and my personal experience, this is not true. Living alone as couples is way different than when responsibilities start to pour in. It is not important that the same person would behave in the same way before as well as after the marriage.…
- 622 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Marriage is the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife. It can also be between two people of the same sex, with legal obligations to each other. A union between two people that is recognized by custom or religious tradition is a marriage. Older generations would think that living together was forbidden. The only way that living together was tolerated is to be married. In the 2000 era times have changed tremendously. Several differences between being married and living together are status in the government, status in the religious community, and status in each others eyes and each others families eyes.…
- 737 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
We typically commit one person at a time. From an evolutionary perspective, monogamous pairing makes sense (parents who cooperated to nurture children more often passed on their genes to future generation). Bonds of love are most satisfying and enduring with a similarity of interests and values, emotional and material spot, and intimate self-disclosure. Those who commit with marriage more often endure, esp. after age 20. The divorce rate is 2x higher than 40 years ago, reflecting women's lessened economic dependence and people's rising expectations. Studies show that those who live together before marriage have higher rates of divorce and marital dysfunction because cohabiters tend to be initially less committed to the ideal of enduring marriage and then they become even less supporting during the…
- 758 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
I remember when my husband and I were dating and we both decided to move in with each other rather quickly. We both felt in order to really get to know one another; we had to see how compatible we both were. Because of this, in just a short three years, we were married but living together really proved to be a valuable lesson for the future. In today’s society many people are getting married and divorced at record rates which are really affecting people views psychologically when it comes to marriage vs. cohabitation; therefore, I plan on exploring both options to see how both of these options work.…
- 826 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1960 less than a half a million people cohabitated. Today that number is closer to five million people along with another half a million same sex couples living together. During the 1990s fifty-six percent of the marriages that occurred were preceded by living together first. There is greater than a fifty percent chance that a woman will marry if she has lived with the man for more than five years. More than half of high school seniors’ believe that it is a good idea to live together before marriage. If you are divorced you are more likely to cohabitate. There are advantages to living together before you are married. Economically it may provide a better life for the two people to be able share household expenses. People who are on public assistance may lose that assistance if they are married. College students may choose to live with their significant other secretly as to not lose their parents assistance. It also provides people with a way to share a life without the legal entanglements of marriage. Some people believe that cohabitation will strengthen their relationships and eventually lead to marriage. Other studies show that living together first show a divorce rate twice as high after ten years of marriage. Cohabitation may not actually be the cause of divorce though. Typically people who with less traditional views of marriage cohabitate together. Because they already value the idea less that may be what leads to eventual…
- 484 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Are your parents married? If so, were they married when they had you? Now, if an American were to be asked these two questions around seventy years ago, the answers would most likely have been yes; however that is not the case in today’s society. Recent studies have shown that marriages in America have taken a tremendous decline due to other alternatives than marriage. People are becoming more and more complacent with their significant other being just a partner rather than a spouse, better known as cohabitation. Although this trend is gaining more popularity in society, marriage in America is pertinent for growth as a nation.…
- 106 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
- Those considering or in the process of separating or who have already separated, here you will…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Katherine Anne Porter, the author of “Marriage is Belonging”, writes that one must sacrifice their independence in order to “…share another life, the life in fact presumably dearest to them” (Porter 56). Being united with someone means that one must always be loyal, honest and generous towards their partner. Porter says that these characteristics as well as reducing the importance of a social life “are required for two people to go on growing together and in the same direction” (Porter58). She uses this quote to explain that one must give up partial freedom so that time and effort can be put into the beginning of their new, shared life. As a result of surrendering one’s social life for a significant other, in return one will be compensated with a permanent place to belong.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
They may have started off as a bold alternative to the institution of marriage, but live-ins these days are mostly a test drive for couples before they tie the knot. Nona Walia finds out why.…
- 1377 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
is an alternative to divorce for people who can’t continue to live together but do not want to end their marriage. A couple is legally separated after petitioning the court to recognize their separation. Simply living apart does not constitute a legal separation.…
- 1058 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The urban life of today is getting dissected and the joint family concept is slowly becoming a vague concept. In earlier times, there use to be big families with lots of couples, in-laws and children. Such families although have their own critical consequences but the share of happiness was immense. It seems that the concept will soon become a pre historic norm. The working couples of the contemporary era prefer to stay alone and the availability of money due to inflow of cash on putting joint effort offer wings to their desires. Taking care of the children is also no more a Herculean task now, as, several day cares and excellent institutions for children have made it a cakewalk. Now the question is whether it is joint family or nuclear family and it is difficult to answer this. Both the set ups have their own benefits and drawbacks. As some of the couples put much stress on their freedom while some others are bothered about the level of stability and security offered by the joint family. Therefore, at a given point of time, if anyone happens to come across the question whether they prefer joint family or nuclear family, it is sure that no body will be able to answer the query at the first instance. On one hand the outcome of enjoying unlimited privacy and the break free from the traditions will rule. On the other hand, the constant guard of various experienced eyes over the activities of your children, the safe guard that comes from standing in unity is also lucrative. The basis of living together or moving apart depend upon the mutual understanding that comes naturally by living together over time. The respect and trust prevailing between the two generations is also another basis that also has the influence on the difference. If the relationship with the in-laws and the other family members is not a easy one then also it�s going to affect the consequence of living all together or drifting away from each other. This also affects the mutual relationship between the…
- 418 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays