In the short story “The Scarlet Ibis” by James Hurst the author illustrates the thematic tension of expectation versus reality ultimately favoring reality. In this story the narrator, Brother, and Doodle, his crippled-broken down-little brother, faces the dilemma of Doodle being disabled-- unable to walk, or do anything by himself-- and he finds himself in a mess of whether or not he wants to learn to become “normal.” From the beginning everybody, except Aunt Nicey, believes that Doodle is a goner. Daddy had even built Doodle a mahogany coffin, which would rest in the barn until the day came, that Doodle would die. But, Brother is determined to teach Doodle how to walk, and become a “normal” little brother. However, in the process all Brother…
In the essay “Living like Weasels”, the author Annie Dillard wrote about her first encounter after she saw a real wild weasel for the first time in her life. The story began when she went to Hollins Pond which is a remarkable place of shallowness where she likes to go at sunset and sit on a tree trunk. Dillard traced the motorcycle path in all gratitude through the wild rose up in to high grassy fields and while she was looking down, a weasel caught her eyes attention; he was looking up at her too. The weasel was ten inches long, thin as a curve, a muscled ribbon, brown as fruitwood, soft-furred, and alert. His face was fierce, small, pointed as Lizard’s, and with two black eyes. They exchanged the glances as two lovers or deadly enemies. Dillard described the moment of seeing the weasel as “a sudden beating of brains, with all the charge and intimate grate of rubbed balloons”. But while all these ideas and thoughts were in Dillard’s mind, the weasel disappeared and Dillard felt like she was having a dream. But after one week she realized that she was not dreaming and she tried to memorize what she saw. She felt like she was in that weasel’s brain for sixty seconds and he was in her mind too. Dillard thought about the weasel’s behavior and the fact that weasels live in necessity and we live by choice, she felt that it would be interesting if she could live as weasels do and she missed her chance. She blamed herself “I should have gone for the throat. I should have lunged for the streak of white under the weasels chin and held on.” Finally, Dillard believed it would be well, proper, and obedient to grasp with your one necessity wherever it takes you as the weasels do.…
Tom faces significant challenges and obstacles that he must overcome through determination and the help of others. These negative consequences enable Tom to learn and transition into a new phase of life with a more positive outlook. Tom realises the importance to move on despite the pain it causes him. This is shown through colloquial language ant the metaphor.…
Paragraphs one to two contrasts the unpredictable weasel that acts according to instinct and necessity, while humans act according to their own will and pride. It establishes the bestiality and…
This essay was originally written in February of 1996 for a composition class that I took at a local community college while completing my third and final year of high school. The original text has been edited to correct spelling and grammar. In truth, this essay is more of a collaboration between Betsy and I. She had take the class from the same instructor the year before. Many of the concepts discussed are largely extrapolations and enhancements of ideas she expressed. She got a B+ on her version; I got an A on mine :).…
The grating cold and bleak surroundings “made no impression on the man” (6) while the dog became “depressed by the tremendous cold” (7), painting the man as a figure unaffected by the severe conditions, immortal and daunting. He viewed the conditions as “cold and uncomfortable, and that was all” (6), which gave him a tough aspect of character, showing the ultimate power and force of nature over man, no matter how fortifying and strong he may be. These characteristics illustrates a contrast between the state of mankind and the state of nature. The animal also provides a comparison of the ignorance of humans’ instinct in comparison to the animal who understands the ferocity of nature. Allowing the environment to kill the man indicates that he is weak both mentally and biologically, while on the other hand the dog is stronger by surviving the same harsh surroundings of the brutal Yukon. “The brute had its instinct” (7) and “its instinct told it a truer tale than was told to the man” (7), because the man was “not much given to thinking”, displaying his obvious ignorance about the ways of nature and how the animal’s instincts trumped his own. Although the man was “keenly observant” (8), he was woefully inept at survival and despite the man’s tough aspects of character, his utter ignorance and over-confidence in himself led to his demise and allowed nature to shape his grisly…
The author's Diction heightens the rancher's commitment to protect the people and the doubt he feels about the decision. Although the man's first “instinct” was not to kill the snake, he realized that it was his “duty” to kill it because of the “ominous” danger it posed to the ranch. The man's natural “instinct” and his moral “duty” to protect the ranch do not align, creating the conflict that the reader identifies with. The man recognizes the “ominous” danger posed by the snake, leaving him with an obligation to remove the danger. At first, the rancher's thought was to “let [the snake] go” for the rancher “never killed” an animal and not “obliged” to kill, but he “reflected” that it posed as a threat to the ranch, thus having to remove it. The rancher wanted to “let [the snake] go” for he has “never killed an animal” because he does not “feel the satisfaction” of killing as a sport. The rancher was very hesitant to kill, but he “reflected” that he needed to protect. The man's obligation and regret about killing the snake creates a conflict that generates the readers emotions through Diction; the Imagery further illustrates this conflict.…
In this story of “A white Heron” Dewett invites us to contemplate that Sylvia made the right decision by not telling the bird’s hunter take the bird to kill it. Whether she might be a better friend with the birds or the bird’s hunter. The narrator talks about a young girl name Sylvia who lives on a farm with her grandmother, Mrs. Tilley. Sylvia friendship with the creatures around her even her grandmother acknowledges that also. Young Sylvia was leading her wayward cow home before the sunset. The woods were filled with shadows. Sylvia was startled by a kind of strange whistle, and then approached by a stranger, who carried a gun over his shoulder. He’s a hunter and shoots birds for his collections. He was looking for a place to stay while he tries to locate a white heron. Without hesitating Sylvia brought the stranger to her grandmother’s house. The hunter was very grateful and gracious. He impressed with the clean and comfortable dwellings. He is also intrigued by Sylvia interpreting her grandmother’s assertions, for Sylvia’s affinity with nature. He might think that Sylvia is kind of the same person as him. She would love him if he hasn’t carry a gun, she could not understand why he killed the very birds he seemed to like so much. He offered $ 10 and gave her a knife, as a gift to be given the location of the heron. The next day Sylvia got up very excited to find a white heron. She climbed a great pine tree and came upon the birds. “The gray eyes of Sylvia also closely identify her to the birds with…
As opposed to blaming her for being incorrect in holding this feeling, Johnson defines the term as a "pleasures immoderately enjoyed" and as an "expectation improperly indulged". Through definition, Johnson has the capacity to couple these two aspects of hope to "disappointment" and name them as "dangerous." While clear in aim and meaning, the roundabout association of disappointment with hope permits Johnson to let the mother down more carefully than if he had straightforwardly expressed his rejection. Moreover, the use of definition permits the writer to make the association and acknowledge the conclusion (rejection) all alone as opposed to having the capacity to straightforwardly place fault on Johnson. The utilization of definition permits the essayist to distance himself from the activity of foreswearing. The author arranges the piece to teach the mother methods in life.The first paragraph, Johnson utilizes the chance to define "hope" and 'expectations improperly indulged' to make a reasonable indication that she had hoped for excessively. He expresses that expectations must take after a typical course, then clarifies how it has not, which simultaneously portrays why she shouldn't have been hopeful in the first place. The write outlines the point that a few hopes must be managed through torment by doing only that in the second paragraph. The first paragraph is used…
I think that what the author was trying to imply in this passage was that in his personal experience, he has noticed that many people take many things for granted and that they don’t live their lives according to what they want and need to do. So much is wasted during one’s lifetime, and people just allow their lives to pass them by.…
When Rainsford falls from the boat Connell describes Rainsford’s primal attempt for survival in animalistic terms stating that he “Doggedly… swam in that direction [of the Island] …with slow deliberate strokes” (Connell,3). Rainsford did not swim mechanically, nor artistically or even in a human fashion, in his desperation, he swam like a dog. Connell, by describing Rainsford’s swimming as dogged, shows that in dire circumstances, even the most rational and trained person, here characterized by Rainsford, resorts to animalistic behavior. This assertion becomes even stronger as the story goes on, when Zaroff finds Rainsford for the first time “The Cossack was the cat; [Rainsford] was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror” (Connell, 12). Striving to survive, Rainsford thought of himself as a cornered animal, and behaved accordingly, he shows that once man is no longer the hunter but the hunted that we act just like prey by hiding, fleeing or scrambling away from our predator. Finishing his story with what he started, Connell shows that humans, just like jaguars “understand one thing--fear. The fear of pain and the fear of death."(Connel,1). One of the only consistencies we see in humans, is the fact that we will all fight or fly in due to fear. Rainsford, as the personification of humanity, fled his predator, which shows us that we truly…
To illustrate, Mrs. Mallard dies of a heart attack from the sight of her husband after acceptance of his death and her new, profound freedom. She feels victory over the opportunity of her independence, and finds life in the death of her husband. However, her joy is defeated by the sight of get husband. The death of her husband proves insignificant compared the mourning she has done over her life never lived. Thus, when her dream of freedom died, so did…
Virginia Woolf’s purpose in writing this piece is to remind us of the power that death has over life. She shows us the desperation of attempting to avoid death but also the inescapable ending of…
Hansen delivers a very strong personal anecdote where she persuades you that ducks are just like human beings. She is lucky enough to see ducks that come and go despite living in a suburbia area. “It is always the same pair of ducks that visit” and she is furious to think that these hunters are so cruel of thinking “it’s fun and personally empowering”.…
In the short story of “Miss Brill” by Katherine Mansfield, Miss Brill is a lonely, old woman who sits in a park and waits for people to come near so she can listen in on their conversations. She becomes so caught up in the conversations of others and the world around her that it makes her forget about her own loneliness. But sadly, it also distorts the image she has of the world around her. The first encounter of this is in the beginning of the story when she pulls out the fur in the box and “rubbed the life back into the dim little eyes”. Miss Brill makes this inanimate object personified by giving it a voice when it says “What has been happening to me?”. This object is a key part in the story because she keeps it with her like her little “side-kick” because she has no one else to talk with. Because she has no one else to interact with, she feeds off of other people’s conversations, relationships, and behaviors. The little fur pelt symbolizes the only friend that she has.…