The founders believed that the power of government should be limited, so it doesn't trample on peoples' natural rights. The framers thus wrote in guarantees that the government could not usurp individual freedoms. Locke believed that citizens gave their consent to the government so that society would operate freely and safely. Government should ensure equal opportunity and protection of political and property rights. The individual is obligated to participate in the political process, but abide by the government's rules. Hobbes is more pessimistic about how violent the state of nature would be and is therefore willing to give the government more power than Locke is. Yes, Americans seem happy that the government has power, but individuals retain rights as well. Unlike many countries, the United States has never had a revolt against its government in the last 200 years (The Civil War was something very different.)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“In Two Treatise of Government,Locke argued that people formed governments to protect their natural rights.The best kind of government he said had limited power and was accepted by all citizens.”(Ellis and Esler 183)…
- 539 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The lack of an impartial judge is a defining characteristic of the state of nature, and this lack of a common judge can lead to confusion and violence therefore leading to the state of war. The state of nature and the state of war are not two separate concepts but the state of nature has the fundamental problem and civil government is the solution for the problems of the state of nature.…
- 397 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…
- 184 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Locke agrees with Hobbes that the purpose of government is to create order in society but contends that people are reasonable and would cooperate with each other and could rebel if ruler were tyrant. Ruler stays in power only as long as he has consent of those governed. He said people had natural rights, including right to life,…
- 1729 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…
- 577 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
John Locke also said that government derived “from the consent of the people” and not by divine right. And therefore, if the people did not like what the government was doing, they had the right of rebellion. This is a great influence because this is why America wanted to write the Declaration of Independence in the first place.…
- 444 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
John Locke then wrote a revolutionary document titled Two Treatises of Government. This piece of literature introduced the idea that every person had the same right to liberty, life, and property. (Locke) In Locke’s paper he writes, “But though men, when they enter into society give up the equality, liberty, and executive power they had in the state of Nature into the hands of society . . . the power of the society or legislative constituted by them can never be supposed to extend farther than the common good.”…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
John Locke’s view of government was that it was good to have one. The people may put their trust in the government so that in turn, the government may trust the people and protect their rights. “The reason why men choose and give power to lawmakers is that there may be made, and rules set, as guards and fences… The people are right in trying to put the laws in the hands of the government which will protect their rights. (Excerpt from Locke's Two Treatises with Government) ”. Within the government, there were societies. Lock felt that the people needed/ wanted a government to protect their rights. They don’t, however, want to be victims of power abuse by the government. “The reason why men enter into society is to preserve their property. (Two Treatises with Government) ”. Every society is made up of citizens; he believed that People (lawmakers) will inevitably abuse their power at some point. When this happens, people should have the right to break free from the government. “When lawmakers abuse absolute power and try…
- 1501 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were to philosophers with opposing opinions on human nature and the state of nature. Locke saw humanity and life with optimism and community, whereas Hobbes only thought of humans as being capable of living a more violent, self-interested lifestyle which would lead to civil unrest. However, both can agree that in order for either way of life to achieve success there must be a sovereign.…
- 1014 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1642 England was starting to seek for changes in the way their government was set up. John Locke and Samuel Rutherford were the leaders of this change, calling for the removal of an absolute monarch. Their works would be opposed by the ideas of Thomas Hobbes, during this eighteen-year civil war in England. The ideas represented in this period would heavily influence the way England’s government would be set up in the eighteenth century.…
- 1678 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Locke's influence in the 18th century was made clear in general and the Second Treatise on Civil Government in particular had a profound impact on the American colonists. The Declaration of Independence, which Thomas Jefferson said was an expression of American sentiment,was influenced greatly by john lockes views and his writings.Locke did not demand a republic.Instead he felt that a contract could exist between the people and a government. Locke uses the term Commonwealth to mean “not a democracy”. Locke felt that a legitimate contract could exist between citizens and monarchies or oligarchies. His ideas heavily influenced, however, both the American and French Revolutions. His notions of people's rights and the role of civil government provided strong support for the intellectual movements of both revolutions. Locke believed that the relationship between the state and its citizens need a contract. where the governed agreed to surrender certain freedoms they enjoyed under the state of nature in exchange for the order and protection provided by a state, according to the rule of law.But if the state crosses its limits and begins to exercise arbitrary power, it forfeits its 'side' of the contract then the citizens not only have the right to overthrow the state, but are indeed morally compelled to revolt and replace it.…
- 559 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The ideas of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes heavily influenced the thinking of the writers of the U.S. Constitution. Both believed in a social contract, that is, that government exists at the consent of the governed, but Locke believed that people would naturally come together to govern themselves, while Hobbes believed they needed a strong authority (monarch) to bring them together. As you research to learn more about what these two philosophers thought about politics, which of their two fundamental ideas most reflect your own thinking? Why? I agree more so with John Locke and his statement on letting the people govern themselves because we do have rights and should be able to make our own decisions. We shouldn’t have to ask someone permission on which school my kids should go to or if I should run this or that or how I live my life. If Thomas Hobbes would have enforced letting someone have total rule then the world would be more complicated today if someone else made decisions for us.…
- 320 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Locke’s ideas may have contributed to the Glorious Revolution in England, which started the idea of a Parliamentary government; which would eventually succeed monarchies. “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it… no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions,” (John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, Chapter II, Article 6). Jefferson became more in tune with Locke’s writings as the British exerted more control over the Colonies and increased taxes, “taxation without representation.” Based on that, the Founding Father’s decided to organize and form an independent country that was self-governing with the rights of its citizens at the forefront. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” (Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, Article 2). Is evident through the Declaration of Independence and Constitution that the most important thing to Jefferson and the Founding Fathers was individual rights and freedom. The Articles of Confederation gave power to each state independently but did not set forth a central governing body overall. This flaw leads to the creation of America’s current Constitution, which established the laws that…
- 1650 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Thomas Hobbes believed mankind good and evil depended on what the individual loved and hated. He believed that life in the state of nature is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." (119) Mankind was naturally equal in power of mind and body so no individual was capable of dominating another. In a strictly natural condition there was no justice or injustice because everyone had their right to seek and take whatever is good and dispose of whatever was bad for them. He was for absolute monarchy. Thomas Hobbes believed that “authoritarian governments were necessary to keep human beings’ worst impulses under control.”(119) He did not believe that a large group of men would agree with one and other and peacefully run a country. Hobbes opposed constitutionalism because of his pessimistic view of human nature. The passages in Hobbes writings show that he did not desire the possibility of anything like modern totalitarianism. For Hobbes, any division of power was an invitation to chaos.…
- 551 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion, readers can understand the ideals and views of Locke’s liberty society, as well as his contribution to the establishment of liberal-democracy and constitutionalism for the past and modern political system from the above paragraphs. During the Age of Enlightenment, most American leaders were influenced by Locke theory, which subsequently led to the American Revolution and the preparation of the first written constitution (Tim McNeese p10). In Locke’s two treatises of government, his proposal of civil government, the state of nature and the Lockean social contract were to support the life, property and freedom are only belonging to each individual. When the civil government as the supervisor in the state, citizens could have enjoyed…
- 170 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays