Locke Secondary Qualities

John Locke's definition of quality is that there are certain things that exists in objects, but not in the mind. Human psyche, as explained by Locke, includes images of the object that is physically there in the real world are transferred and formed in the mind as ideas which are only symbolic representation of what the object is. All objects or items that are present in the world are just analyzed and processed by our minds to create and are described by two types of qualities which are primary qualities and secondary qualities. Locke explains how there is a crucial difference between the First and Secondary qualities to describe sensation and what they resemble in the world. primary qualities and secondary qualities are both able the produce
Yet, the easiest example of a primary quality of an object that I could think of is the mass of the object compared to the weight of the object since the mass of the object is not dependent whereas the weight of the object depends on gravity. Secondary qualities are described by how they don't resemble their causes which means the relationship between the physical object and the mind interpreting and perceiving the secondary qualities of the physical object by using our senses. Locke says that the second qualities are only present when the primary qualities are established so secondary qualities are caused by the primary qualities of the object. Some examples of secondary qualities include an object's taste, smell, or sound. Yet, the easiest example of a secondary quality of an object that I can think of is the object's color since even if the color of the object is different from the color that the mind creates, it has no bearing on the physical object. Color perception is different for everybody since I can view the color of an object as red and another person can view the color as something completely different or at least a different
Hobbes believes that people are not born to be social and it is not human nature to function in society together with each other. The state of nature is the real condition of human beings before or without being introduced to order. The First Law of Nature is human beings seeking a state of peace because at the end of the day, it's about whatever gives the best chance of survival. The Second Law of Nature follows the First Law of Nature which is people creating covenant which eventually leads to an absolute sovereign entity. The Third Law of Nature is to follow the covenant to maintain order. The laws of nature were created to help bring people together to cooperate with eachother to survive. So, Hobbes' doctrine state of nature was that he wanted to explain to everyone why he wants everybody to submit to an absolute sovereign entity to control everyone. One of the many arguments that is contradictory in the Leviathan is how would a person be okay with giving up their rights to live under a sovereign entity who controls and enforces all laws and punishments instead of being a free entity and stay in a state of nature to do things freely? The state of nature is very unsafe and unsecure, so I can see how Hobbes has the intent of everybody having the best possible life living in safety